The Reasons for This Vehicle Escape Me
#1
Member
Thread Starter
The Reasons for This Vehicle Escape Me
Saw one at the dealer a couple of days ago. I can't understand who the potential buyers for this model are. This one was black on black so maybe an undertaker?
#3
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
2005 Carlsson CD32 E320 CDI Inline-6
The potential buyers:
The price and configuration of the vehicle suggests OLDER buyers:
Price: in the $60's. Not exactly for young families with little home equity, even if they have high income the $ will be needed elsewhere, even though the R actually looks like a soccer taxi.
Younger people with that kind of $ for a vehicle will be looking more to say, an M3 or hotrod Audi or maybe an E55 if they have true class.
Configuration suggests a road-tripper/ grocery grabber vehicle. Most younger types are employed, so long trips mean airplanes, no time for sightseeing have to get back to the office.
Another clue is the marketing. For example, the "Rock the R" campaign on the Rolling Stones concert tour. Rolling Stones, need I say more about age group. There was a bomb scare at a Stones show in Charlottesville, and Jay Leno commented that terrorists have no shame, now they are attacking senior citzens.
Price: in the $60's. Not exactly for young families with little home equity, even if they have high income the $ will be needed elsewhere, even though the R actually looks like a soccer taxi.
Younger people with that kind of $ for a vehicle will be looking more to say, an M3 or hotrod Audi or maybe an E55 if they have true class.
Configuration suggests a road-tripper/ grocery grabber vehicle. Most younger types are employed, so long trips mean airplanes, no time for sightseeing have to get back to the office.
Another clue is the marketing. For example, the "Rock the R" campaign on the Rolling Stones concert tour. Rolling Stones, need I say more about age group. There was a bomb scare at a Stones show in Charlottesville, and Jay Leno commented that terrorists have no shame, now they are attacking senior citzens.
Last edited by cdiken; 10-14-2005 at 08:11 PM.
#4
wife and I looked at it and optioned it out...not worth it IMO...option for option it priced out 10k more than the new ML.
It's a nice idea, but i dont know how well a luxo van/crossover will sell...
It's a nice idea, but i dont know how well a luxo van/crossover will sell...
Trending Topics
#8
Super Member
Originally Posted by asianml
It's a compromise.
Compromise? What's the trade off? It looks like a minivan, doesn't have the versatility of one, has a cheaply made interior, and costs and arm and a leg... I see where cars, minivans, vans, SUVs, pick-ups, and crossovers (eg. Touareg, X5, ML, RX, MDX, and FX) fit in but grand tourers are for someone who hasn't a clue what they want.. I guess the reason for the rants in these last few threads is because I drove my friend's new Honda Odyssey and wondered where the extra $35K went into the R500....
Eric...
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 5,517
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
6 Posts
2011 E350 Cabriolet..White and Almond Mocha
Originally Posted by EKaru
Compromise? What's the trade off? It looks like a minivan, doesn't have the versatility of one, has a cheaply made interior, and costs and arm and a leg... I see where cars, minivans, vans, SUVs, pick-ups, and crossovers (eg. Touareg, X5, ML, RX, MDX, and FX) fit in but grand tourers are for someone who hasn't a clue what they want.. I guess the reason for the rants in these last few threads is because I drove my friend's new Honda Odyssey and wondered where the extra $35K went into the R500....
Eric...
Eric...
Many will buy it and many will not. It is here, it is for sale, it will be bought, and it will be enjoyed by those who do buy it.
I changed my mind for other reasons but still think it is a fine vehicle and has many features people are looking for.
#10
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 18,414
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
2007 E63
Originally Posted by Nevada Jack
Eric...get over it...go buy the Odessey but stop justifying your potential purchase on the forum by bashing the R.
Many will buy it and many will not. It is here, it is for sale, it will be bought, and it will be enjoyed by those who do buy it.
I changed my mind for other reasons but still think it is a fine vehicle and has many features people are looking for.
Many will buy it and many will not. It is here, it is for sale, it will be bought, and it will be enjoyed by those who do buy it.
I changed my mind for other reasons but still think it is a fine vehicle and has many features people are looking for.
#11
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wichita
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2005 SL600, 2011 Honda Odyssey Touring Elite
Originally Posted by EKaru
Compromise? What's the trade off? It looks like a minivan, doesn't have the versatility of one, has a cheaply made interior, and costs and arm and a leg... I see where cars, minivans, vans, SUVs, pick-ups, and crossovers (eg. Touareg, X5, ML, RX, MDX, and FX) fit in but grand tourers are for someone who hasn't a clue what they want.. I guess the reason for the rants in these last few threads is because I drove my friend's new Honda Odyssey and wondered where the extra $35K went into the R500....
Eric...
Eric...
That said, the Odyssey Touring is pretty hard to beat for the money.
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NYC / Miami
Posts: 3,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2020 BMW X3M Comp
My R-Class opinion
First I saw the pictures and I thought WTF!?!
Then I saw it at the dealership and I thought WTF!?!
I saw one on the road tonight and I didn't think WTF... I thought what an ugly POS. I just don't get it and I find it plain out ugly. I honestly think that if I needed anything like this type of vehicle, I would buy a Town and Country.
Then I saw it at the dealership and I thought WTF!?!
I saw one on the road tonight and I didn't think WTF... I thought what an ugly POS. I just don't get it and I find it plain out ugly. I honestly think that if I needed anything like this type of vehicle, I would buy a Town and Country.
#13
Super Member
Different STrokes
I have a Tahoe currently and cannot wait until my R arrives.
Obviously different strokes for different folks...i find it attractive, though not striking, and the interior is incredible. Having owned plenty of late-model W210s and W211's, i think the build quality is better than anything else MB has recently put out (save the new M)...the days of spare no expense raw materials are over, period. It seats my whole family, offers me a better driving experience than my Tahoe, and gets better mileage. Plus its a safety cage on wheels. I have to laugh that anyone feels strongly negative enough to bash-
Obviously different strokes for different folks...i find it attractive, though not striking, and the interior is incredible. Having owned plenty of late-model W210s and W211's, i think the build quality is better than anything else MB has recently put out (save the new M)...the days of spare no expense raw materials are over, period. It seats my whole family, offers me a better driving experience than my Tahoe, and gets better mileage. Plus its a safety cage on wheels. I have to laugh that anyone feels strongly negative enough to bash-
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 5,517
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
6 Posts
2011 E350 Cabriolet..White and Almond Mocha
Originally Posted by NY C32
First I saw the pictures and I thought WTF!?!
Then I saw it at the dealership and I thought WTF!?!
I saw one on the road tonight and I didn't think WTF... I thought what an ugly POS. I just don't get it and I find it plain out ugly. I honestly think that if I needed anything like this type of vehicle, I would buy a Town and Country.
Then I saw it at the dealership and I thought WTF!?!
I saw one on the road tonight and I didn't think WTF... I thought what an ugly POS. I just don't get it and I find it plain out ugly. I honestly think that if I needed anything like this type of vehicle, I would buy a Town and Country.
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 5,517
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
6 Posts
2011 E350 Cabriolet..White and Almond Mocha
Originally Posted by carpersn
I have a Tahoe currently and cannot wait until my R arrives.
Obviously different strokes for different folks...i find it attractive, though not striking, and the interior is incredible. Having owned plenty of late-model W210s and W211's, i think the build quality is better than anything else MB has recently put out (save the new M)...the days of spare no expense raw materials are over, period. It seats my whole family, offers me a better driving experience than my Tahoe, and gets better mileage. Plus its a safety cage on wheels. I have to laugh that anyone feels strongly negative enough to bash-
Obviously different strokes for different folks...i find it attractive, though not striking, and the interior is incredible. Having owned plenty of late-model W210s and W211's, i think the build quality is better than anything else MB has recently put out (save the new M)...the days of spare no expense raw materials are over, period. It seats my whole family, offers me a better driving experience than my Tahoe, and gets better mileage. Plus its a safety cage on wheels. I have to laugh that anyone feels strongly negative enough to bash-
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by EKaru
Compromise? What's the trade off? It looks like a minivan, doesn't have the versatility of one, has a cheaply made interior, and costs and arm and a leg... I see where cars, minivans, vans, SUVs, pick-ups, and crossovers (eg. Touareg, X5, ML, RX, MDX, and FX) fit in but grand tourers are for someone who hasn't a clue what they want.. I guess the reason for the rants in these last few threads is because I drove my friend's new Honda Odyssey and wondered where the extra $35K went into the R500....
Eric...
Eric...
Realize that no one wants to drive a honday or american mini van if they dont have to and people with decent income levels wont want to be stuck in a 25k people hauler. There is a market for this car but it not the biggerst market around. I think it is the only car in the segment so it will do very well. Sales fo the car are going VERY well so I doubt it will be a flop!
The R is far larger than every car u just listed so i venture to guess it carries a lot more "junk" than those SUV's. I personally hate most SUV's and this car does sit lower and drive better than the cars you mentioned. An ML63 is a interesting alternative though... hmmm. But again i have no need to haul people around and I dont need a junk mover so guess what I dont have any of those cars .
Most MB buyers dont sit back and penny pinch so i think it will do just fine -- just like the new ML!
Last edited by CynCarvin32; 10-19-2005 at 12:36 AM.
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South Orange County, CA
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
4 wheels
I have an Odyssey and am on the waiting list for a new R500 (opted out of the R63 until a later time, I know Jack is dissapointed). Hands down this car will have more room and storage options than my Odyssey, not to mention is a hell of a lot faster, better looking, and far more comfortable.
#18
Super Member
Originally Posted by CynCarvin32
Eric u dont have kids, a need to haul people or things so this car is clearly not for you. My sister is about to have her first child and it is exactly what she needs. Without the third row of seats in use the car holds a ton of junk, is very comfortable, is well built IMHO, and is a good idea. You need to realize who these cars are marketed towards. You as a young doctor has no need for it so of course you and your wife think it is pointess
Realize that no one wants to drive a honday or american mini van if they dont have to and people with decent income levels wont want to be stuck in a 25k people hauler. There is a market for this car but it not the biggerst market around. I think it is the only car in the segment so it will do very well. Sales fo the car are going VERY well so I doubt it will be a flop!
The R is far larger than every car u just listed so i venture to guess it carries a lot more "junk" than those SUV's. I personally hate most SUV's and this car does sit lower and drive better than the cars you mentioned. An ML63 is a interesting alternative though... hmmm. But again i have no need to haul people around and I dont need a junk mover so guess what I dont have any of those cars .
Most MB buyers dont sit back and penny pinch so i think it will do just fine -- just like the new ML!
Realize that no one wants to drive a honday or american mini van if they dont have to and people with decent income levels wont want to be stuck in a 25k people hauler. There is a market for this car but it not the biggerst market around. I think it is the only car in the segment so it will do very well. Sales fo the car are going VERY well so I doubt it will be a flop!
The R is far larger than every car u just listed so i venture to guess it carries a lot more "junk" than those SUV's. I personally hate most SUV's and this car does sit lower and drive better than the cars you mentioned. An ML63 is a interesting alternative though... hmmm. But again i have no need to haul people around and I dont need a junk mover so guess what I dont have any of those cars .
Most MB buyers dont sit back and penny pinch so i think it will do just fine -- just like the new ML!
Eric..
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 5,517
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
6 Posts
2011 E350 Cabriolet..White and Almond Mocha
Originally Posted by MB Fanatic
I have an Odyssey and am on the waiting list for a new R500 (opted out of the R63 until a later time, I know Jack is dissapointed). Hands down this car will have more room and storage options than my Odyssey, not to mention is a hell of a lot faster, better looking, and far more comfortable.
The R500 will more than give you a kick...enjoy it and lets see some pictures when it arrives. Offer the Odessey to Eric...he seems to like the lower line makers...lol
#20
Super Member
Originally Posted by Nevada Jack
\
The R500 will more than give you a kick...enjoy it and lets see some pictures when it arrives. Offer the Odessey to Eric...he seems to like the lower line makers...lol
The R500 will more than give you a kick...enjoy it and lets see some pictures when it arrives. Offer the Odessey to Eric...he seems to like the lower line makers...lol
Sorry Jack, I'm not as rich as you are to be able to spend $70K on minivans...
Eric..
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 5,517
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
6 Posts
2011 E350 Cabriolet..White and Almond Mocha
Originally Posted by EKaru
Sorry Jack, I'm not as rich as you are to be able to spend $70K on minivans...
Eric..
Eric..
If you had my money (which you greatly over estimate) would you then pay $70K regardless of the comments you have made regarding its makeup?
I hope you find the vehicle you are looking for and are happy with it once you get it.
#22
Super Member
Originally Posted by Nevada Jack
The two cars are not equal Eric and if you want better quality you pay more money.
If this is about quality, where does Honda rank in comparison to MB? Have you read this Top Gear Article?
The tale is recalled by the chief executive of a dealership that sold Mercedes-Benz in London. His salesmen were lounging around the showroom when a small group of menacing-looking undesirables ambled in. They would like to take the AMG M-Class for an extended road test, they said. As the visitors were packing heat, a nervous salesman handed over the keys. The M-Class was never seen again. The chief executive later admitted, "I console myself with the certainty that, sooner or later, the car broke down."
This true anecdote epitomises a major challenge for the car maker with probably the best reputation in the world. Mercedes-Benz's rock-solid image is no longer matched by reality.
In any quality, reliability and customer satisfaction survey, it is generally an average performer, little better than cheaper marques that lack the same elevated status. Sometimes it is much worse. Volkswagen and Audi, two other well-regarded German brands, are invariably middling performers in surveys as well, though Porsches and BMWs are usually well-rated by their owners. Does Germany's fabled engineering expertise bear close scrutiny these days?
The stark disparity between admiration for a brand and the real issues involved in ownership is provided by a survey of over 38,000 members of ADAC (the German motoring organisation) by the AutoMarxx consultancy.
Asked to rank the image of car brands on the market, members put Mercedes firmly top, followed by BMW, Audi, VW, Porsche and Volvo in that order. No other brand was even close. Does one detect a touch of patriotism here? At the bottom, in worsening order, were Daewoo, Lancia, Rover, Subaru, Daihatsu and Suzuki.
However, the tables were turned upside down when members were asked to rate their ownership satisfaction. The top six were Japanese: Toyota, Subaru, Honda, Mazda, Nissan and Mitsubishi. And at the bottom of the chart? In descending order they were: Chrysler, Smart, Fiat, Volkswagen, Mercedes and Land Rover. There have been enough other surveys for Fiat's and Land Rover's positions not to be a surprise. They are the car world's equivalent of junk bonds. The survey's shock is to find Mercedes and Volkswagen competing with them for last place in a country that clearly holds its domestic products in the highest esteem.
While the reports by ADAC and other organisations confirm the superior manufacturing quality and reliability of Japanese brands, they raise serious question about the reputations of some German nameplates. They're not as good as the world thinks they are.
Germany's car makers produce a lot of beautiful, advanced cars that consumers around the world can't wait to buy. Sales of Audi, BMW, Mercedes and Porsche were at record levels last year. The prospects this year look equally good. The appeal is clearly much deeper than quality and reliability. The whole world would drive Toyotas if it wasn't. Design, performance, safety and residual values are important elements in the buying decision as well. And so, more particularly, is prestige. A Renault just won't cut it down at the golf club when a Mercedes-Benz can be bought for similar money.
But there is a weird dynamic in the market if Mercedes-Benz's reputation is still so high at a time when its quality and reliability are so in-different. Is the king wearing any clothes?
The trouble is not imagined. Mercedes-Benz plummeted from fifth overall in the 1997 initial quality survey carried out by JD Power & Associates in the United States to 15th last year. On longer-term reliability, JD Power's US ratings saw Mercedes plunge from top slot at the start of the Nineties to an embarrassing 26th place (out of 36) last year. Jurgen Hubbert, the head of Smart and Mercedes-Benz cars, acknowledged the issue at a conference in the United States earlier this year, when he said the aim was to return to the top of the quality charts by 2006. That's Yes Minister for admitting there's a problem now.
Hubbert said Mercedes has addressed the quality issues and, as each new model comes on to the market, the company will steadily return to its rightful position. At least that's the theory. Seven out of every 10 problems involved electronics, Hubbert said. "Whichever company is in the (technological) lead has the biggest problems," he commented. But Mercedes' problems were more extensive than that. It was simply too stretched to do the job properly.
In the late Nineties, the group embarked on an ambitious plan that totally reshaped its structure and scale. For the first time in its history, Mercedes began to develop new models to pre-determined budgets and timetables. Previously, it worked to what are called cost-plus principles, in which the customer pays for the cost plus profit margin. Cars appeared only when the engineers were satisfied they were right, which could be several months behind schedule. The philosophy all went horribly wrong with the 1991 S-Class and the arrival of much higher standards from other car firms, which made the change decades earlier.
When Mercedes eventually followed the lead, it was just not very good at it. Yet, at the same time, it initiated the development of a whole swathe of additional models, including the A-Class, M-Class and V-Class, together with more coupes and roadsters. The all-new Smart and Maybach projects were launched as well. And it built its first factory in the United States.
Meanwhile, Mercedes' parent group, Daimler-Benz, took control of Chrysler and then bought a major stake in Mitsubishi Motors. Unknown to Daimler, the affairs of both companies were unhealthy, to say the least; including product quality that was well below par. The acquisitions took - and still take - enormous tolls on Daimler management and finances. This was all time and money not spent on Mercedes, whose quality began to suffer as a result.
Like many political and military leaders, Daimler-Benz made the classic strategic error of advancing simultaneously on too many fronts.
These days, though, it is misleading to think in purely nationalistic terms. The global nature of the international motor industry has rendered that concept obsolete.
For example, many of the models contributing to Toyota's number one position in Germany's first JD Power customer satisfaction index were made in Britain and France. The Smart that was the leading 'German' model in the Consumers' Association's reliability survey is assembled in France. The leading 'German' model in the Top Gear/Experian analysis was the BMW Z3, which was made in the US.
Many BMWs, Mercedes and Volkswagens sold in this country are built in South Africa, not Germany. It's not a secret, but none of the companies goes out of their way to explain that fact to its customers. And they, in turn, are happy to believe they're buying German quality.
Elsewhere, we buy Volkswagens from Mexico and Slovakia, Mercedes from Spain and the United States, Vauxhalls from Poland and Australia, Suzukis from Hungary and India and Renaults from Turkey and Slovenia. In the near future, Europeans will have Hondas built in China and Americans will be able to buy Saabs made in Japan and Ohio.
In other words, brand is more important than country of origin when determining car quality. The clever trick by companies like Toyota and Honda is to achieve the same, high manufacturing standards wherever they make cars.
In reality, German firms lost the quality crown to the Japanese manufacturers years ago. The evidence has been public since at least 1981, when Dave Power published his first analysis of car quality in the United States. Since then, a succession of surveys by JD Power and other organisations around the world have regularly revealed how much better made and more reliable the average Japanese car is.
The regular publication of these surveys made public what was previously one of the industry's best kept secrets: comparative data about car manufacturing quality, reliability standards and customer satisfaction. The beneficiaries are all car buyers everywhere, because the effect was to raise levels across the whole industry. For example, the standards of a French or Korean car today are better than those of a Japanese one a couple of decades ago.
The surveys vary by definition, but their results display certain common themes. While, in general, Japanese brands rated best, Mitsubishi, in particular, has some catching up to do. German firms are often only middling performers, though Porsche and BMW owners usually rate their experiences highly. Volkswagen, in spite of its great reputation for solidity, is often below Renault, which has a long-standing reputation for unreliability.
Just as oddly, Volkswagen invariably finishes below the same group's entry-level brand, Skoda. The Octavia finished third overall in the Top Gear survey compared with 106th (out of 137) for the more expensive Golf model on which it is based. Consumers may one day begin to wonder about the wisdom of paying more for a product that is quantifiably inferior.
Fords tend to do better than the Vauxhalls (and Opels) of its big American rival, GM. South Korean and Swedish firms are generally average, but Italian and French brands tend to languish near the bottom of any table.
All too frequently, though, that table is propped up by a certain four-wheel-drive manufacturer from Solihull. Just like some German brands, Land Rover appears to enjoy a charmed existence in the showrooms.
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South Orange County, CA
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
4 wheels
My 2003 Accord has terrible issues. My 2004 TL had many damn problems the dealer could not resolve either. I finally got a good deal on a 2005 TL and jumped on it as they bought back the 2004.
If you are trying to tell me that Honda is more reliable, then save it. Honda/Acura have had some serious issues with their cars such as:
1) Transmission failures
2) serious build quality problems
3) Electrical problems (Sound systems dying, and other things with ABS)
Some Hondas are made in Canada, some in Japan, some in America. I dont give a **** where the car is made as long as it has great build quality and is flawless.
Secondly, the buyout of Chrysler was good for DaimlerChrysler. Look at Chrysler now, they have a damn good product line and it sure as hell is doing well. They are inflicting great damage on Ford and GM. Lets face it the merger will pay off in the long run. Now that Dieter Zietsche has taken over at Mercedes Benz, things will change and the days of cost cutting and decontenting are over Eric.
If you are trying to tell me that Honda is more reliable, then save it. Honda/Acura have had some serious issues with their cars such as:
1) Transmission failures
2) serious build quality problems
3) Electrical problems (Sound systems dying, and other things with ABS)
Some Hondas are made in Canada, some in Japan, some in America. I dont give a **** where the car is made as long as it has great build quality and is flawless.
Secondly, the buyout of Chrysler was good for DaimlerChrysler. Look at Chrysler now, they have a damn good product line and it sure as hell is doing well. They are inflicting great damage on Ford and GM. Lets face it the merger will pay off in the long run. Now that Dieter Zietsche has taken over at Mercedes Benz, things will change and the days of cost cutting and decontenting are over Eric.
#24
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 5,517
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
6 Posts
2011 E350 Cabriolet..White and Almond Mocha
Eric...I don't give a hoot about Honda, Toyotas, Lexus, Acura and the rest. I owned an Acura Vigor (and a bunch of other so called competitive makes) and that was enough for me! You can print all the articles you want but my almost 30 years of driving MB is what determines my choices and has convinced me what real quality is...not JD Powers and those jokers who manipulate the public opinion. I loved my Z3, I loved my Jag VP, I loved my Volvo's, but they were always second cars to my primary MB.
Go buy your Honda's and Audi's or whatever you seem to think is a better "deal" than a MB and is on top of the latest quality survey. If you are happy fine. In the meantime I will drive my "Benz" knowing that I am safe as I can possibly be and enjoy the "perks" that come with ownership of one of the best cars in the world.
There is an intangible plus that comes when you own a MB. I hope it hits you someday so buying a new car in the future will not be such a troubling experience.
Go buy your Honda's and Audi's or whatever you seem to think is a better "deal" than a MB and is on top of the latest quality survey. If you are happy fine. In the meantime I will drive my "Benz" knowing that I am safe as I can possibly be and enjoy the "perks" that come with ownership of one of the best cars in the world.
There is an intangible plus that comes when you own a MB. I hope it hits you someday so buying a new car in the future will not be such a troubling experience.
#25
Super Member
I'm sick and tired of all the problems I've had with my year old C55... Transmission connector failing TWICE and series of electrical issues which were never resolved by the service dept.