S-Class (W126) 1979-1991: 300 SE, 300 SEL, 380 SE, 380 SEL, 420 SEL, 500 SEL, 560 SEL, 360 SEC, 500 SEC, 580 SEC, 300 SD TURBODIESEL, 300 SDL TURBO, 350 SD TURBO, 350 SDL TURBO

SE length vs. SEL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-08-2008, 11:11 PM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Richard / E320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Bay Area, California
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2001 E320
SE length vs. SEL

I know that the SEL is approximately 6" longer than an SE; is the longer overall wheelbase reflected in the front and rear doors being wider? Looks like hood length and trunk length are the same...

Last edited by Richard / E320; 11-09-2008 at 08:12 PM.
Old 11-09-2008, 06:35 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Untertürkheim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Richard / E320
I know that the SEL is approximately 6" longer than an SE; is the longer overall wheelbase refelcted in the front and rear doors being wider? Looks like hood length and trunk length are the same...
Everything is identical except the rear doors.
Old 11-09-2008, 08:17 PM
  #3  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Richard / E320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Bay Area, California
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2001 E320
Originally Posted by Untertürkheim
Everything is identical except the rear doors.
Thanks Untertürkheim; I was parked by a 300SE the other day and I could tell that it didn't look quite right. Then I realized it was an 'SE' and not a long wheelbased SEL. Since I was side-by-side, I could see the longer overall length and it seemed that the back doors were longer on mine. Then my eyes were playing tricks, as it seemed the front doors were a little longer too... looks like the longer wheelbased SEL has more room, just for the back seat passengers.

Thanks again for the reply...
Old 11-09-2008, 08:24 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Untertürkheim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Richard / E320
Thanks Untertürkheim; I was parked by a 300SE the other day and I could tell that it didn't look quite right. Then I realized it was an 'SE' and not a long wheelbased SEL. Since I was side-by-side, I could see the longer overall length and it seemed that the back doors were longer on mine. Then my eyes were playing tricks, as it seemed the front doors were a little longer too... looks like the longer wheelbased SEL has more room, just for the back seat passengers.

Thanks again for the reply...
Exactly. In markets where both SE and SEL were available with any engine, the SE was much more popular because it was a bit more nimble, with no space penalty except rear legroom.
Old 11-16-2008, 10:02 AM
  #5  
Almost a Member!
 
RogerJones's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harpenden, Hertfordshire, England
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1996 W124 E320 Coupé, 1990 W124 300E twin turbo, 1991 W126 300 SE, 1984 Ford Capri 2.8i
From MB's Technical data passenger cars (October 1993):

SE/SD
Wheelbase 2935mm
Length 5145mm USA, 5020mm elsewhere

SEL/SDL
Wheelbase 3075mm
Length 5285mm USA, 5160mm elsewhere

SEC
Wheelbase 2845mm (2850mm 420SEC and USA)
Length 5060mm USA, 4935mm elsewhere

Last edited by RogerJones; 11-16-2008 at 10:13 AM.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SE length vs. SEL



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:13 AM.