S-Class (W126) 1979-1991: 300 SE, 300 SEL, 380 SE, 380 SEL, 420 SEL, 500 SEL, 560 SEL, 360 SEC, 500 SEC, 580 SEC, 300 SD TURBODIESEL, 300 SDL TURBO, 350 SD TURBO, 350 SDL TURBO

DIN Horsepower?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-16-2004, 09:30 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
GTR John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Surrey, B.C, Canada.
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1990 500SL / 1989 560 SEC
Question DIN Horsepower?

I have a 1986 560 SEC AMG Euro, but with the 5.6L. I know they are rated at 300 Horsepower, but is that DIN or SAE horsepower???

Also, what is the difference between the 5.6L and the AMG Engine that was in the 560 AMG?

Please and Thank you.
Old 03-16-2004, 11:40 AM
  #2  
Member
 
EuroCoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I'm not mistaken, DIN horsepower is within a few decimals of HP. Not sure about your SAE question. As far as the 5.6 AMG motor, there are 2 versions. The first has more aggressive cams/lifters/springs and headers is normally coupled with a large bore exhaust, HP is rated at around 320. The second is the 4valve, DOHC heads which is rated at 360 HP. The cylinders on the 5.6 could also be bored to 100mm from 96.5 to achieve a 6.0L capacity to provide 331 HP. Then the big dog, 6.0 w/DOHC heads, rated at a "conservative" 375HP, 407LB/FT.
Old 03-16-2004, 07:00 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MB AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 3,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 E55 AMG
I'd love to drive an AMG 5.6L or 6.0L version of the 560SEC. Just wondering why the power was so low in the North American version? I find the 560SEC's power adequate for all my needs but I wasn't very impressed with the numbers. They actually had to de-tune it that much for emissions!?
Old 03-17-2004, 01:07 AM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
 
GTR John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Surrey, B.C, Canada.
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1990 500SL / 1989 560 SEC
So, mine is the untuned 5.6 Euro motor. 300HP. But, is that DIN hp?? I know the Germans test the engines by DIN meaning with everything on the engine including the power steering pump, oil pump, and etc etc.
Old 03-17-2004, 12:01 PM
  #5  
Member
 
EuroCoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just wondering why the power was so low in the North American version? I find the 560SEC's power adequate for all my needs but I wasn't very impressed with the numbers.
The 238hp rating is very conservative and an effort to keep insurance costs down at the time. I don't know anybody who has dyno'd a stock U.S. 560 but I've always heard that its closer to 260-270 hp. The Euro is faster and definitely feels faster but not 65hp faster.
Old 03-17-2004, 03:10 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BlownV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,542
Received 1,064 Likes on 853 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
Formula: 1.0 SAE HP = 1.01411685309470545 DIN

I think the SEC in Euro trim with cats was rated at 278 but without cats and airpump it was rated at 300 DIN.
Old 03-23-2004, 12:43 PM
  #7  
Newbie
 
bigchingan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
from what I had understood, the american 560 SEC non amg was rated @ 238 and it was done not just for emissions purposes, but also in an effort to reduce insurance rates.
Old 03-23-2004, 12:44 PM
  #8  
Newbie
 
bigchingan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oh, forgot to mention that I believe most people who have driven the car would say that that figure is VASTLY conservative, and the actually power is probably closer to 280-300
Old 03-24-2004, 12:14 AM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BlownV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,542
Received 1,064 Likes on 853 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
"power is probably closer to 280-300"

Nope, not even close on the US models. The 238 hp rating is pretty much on the money. These cars ususally dyno at around 190 RWHP which translates to 238 crank hp if you figure 20% drive losses.
Old 03-24-2004, 12:31 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
DslBnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mercedes increased the performance of their V8 models without ever recording it in their owner's manual(it still said 238). After september '87, all catalyst equipped versions had 270 somewhat hp. So an '86 560 SHOULD have only 190 RWHP on the dyno. But not the later ones.
Old 03-24-2004, 09:08 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BlownV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,542
Received 1,064 Likes on 853 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
"After september '87, all catalyst equipped versions had 270 somewhat hp."

Where did you get this information? We are talking about the US models hp not the Euro.

Here is some more information:

http://varshney.net/SEC/dyno_day/dyno_results.htm

They dynoed a 1990 560 SEC and it produced 200 RWHP. That's still well short of the 270 crank hp you propose but it's the highest dynojet reading I've seen from a stock US 560 SEC and still well within the claim for the factory hp rating.

Last edited by BlownV8; 03-24-2004 at 09:33 AM.
Old 03-24-2004, 11:28 AM
  #12  
Member
 
EuroCoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, first time I've seen a dyno with a stock U.S. 560. I can't wait to rub this in my father-in-laws face. I had a Euro 560 and he has a U.S. 560 and he claimed there was not much difference at all and insists there's no way 238 hp is correct. I will be dynoing my 6.0 soon so I'll post numbers for that too.
Old 03-24-2004, 04:28 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
DslBnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have driven MANY M116/M117 V8's before. Each one is different. But the '88 + models seem to be exceptionally quick. The real way you can find out is taking a note of the environment, and racing each other.

Maybe the one's I've driven have just been broken in really well?

The 560SL I've got will rip your head off if you prod it too much.:p
Old 03-24-2004, 04:41 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BlownV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,542
Received 1,064 Likes on 853 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
"Maybe the one's I've driven have just been broken in really well?"

I don't know but the engine and internals are the same from 1986 to 1991 on the US 5.6L engines. The power is the same on all of them but the earlier ones may have had more excessive wear than the later ones making them a little slower? I would hardly call the power of a stock US 560 SEL as rip your head off fast. Put on a supercharger, different exhaust/headers, and then it will have some power but without those mods the US cars are really anemic compared to the performance of most new cars. I know the torque makes it feel quick but it really isin't.
Old 03-24-2004, 10:34 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
DslBnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I said 560SL. Not the SEL. Sorry, I know this is the W126 forum. Have you driven a good 560SL, lately?

It must be the torque, then.
Old 03-25-2004, 01:05 AM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BlownV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,542
Received 1,064 Likes on 853 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
Sorry, I meant to say 560 SL. The 560 SL is even slower than the SEC and is rated at 227 vs the SEC's 238. The US 560 SEC was rated at 0-60 in 7.2 and the SL was rated at 8 seconds to 60 mph due to a more restrictive exhaust system.
Old 03-25-2004, 10:31 AM
  #17  
Member
 
EuroCoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Plus the SL weighs a little more than the SEC. My father-in-law says the same thing, "I've driven a bunch and mine just feels faster than all of them." May be true but you wouldn't think it could be any more than a tenth or two in 0-60 and 1/4 mile times.
Old 03-29-2004, 02:14 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
DslBnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The SL is actually lighter than the SEC. The SL "only" weighs 3740 lbs, while the US SEC weighs 3900 + lbs.

So you're saying that a 560SL weighing in at 3740 lbs with 227 hp and 278 lb/ft of torque is barely as fast as a 177 hp 188 lb/ft of torque screamer 300E with 3300 - 3500 lbs?
Old 03-29-2004, 04:00 PM
  #19  
Member
 
EuroCoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gearing

I must have been thinking of the R129 SL, not the 107 as far as weight goes. I think the 300E is near the SL in acceleration figures due to not only the minor weight loss, but also the gearing. Doesn't the 560SL have a 2.47 rear end? The 300E's have 3.07 and some 3.27 which would make a big difference over the 2.47.
Old 03-30-2004, 09:10 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
DslBnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, but the 560 has a lot of low end torque. The 300E is a screamer six.

Oh, well. I am only going by what the car feels like. Maybe I'm wrong, maybe not.

Then again I wasn't wrong about my diesel, LLA.

Last edited by DslBnz; 03-30-2004 at 09:15 PM.
Old 04-18-2004, 04:08 AM
  #21  
Member
 
drakon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 197
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1990 560 SEC (modified), SLK55, CLK500
Give us a 0-60 time, and top speed.

Stock US 560 SEC run about 7.2 0-60, pretty much any model between 86 to 91. Look up stuff at mbcoupes.com.

Mercedes did offer different rear ends, which make the car feel a HECK of a lot faster, but the 'power' is about the same.

And seriously, you haven't driven any post '96 mercedes have you? Almost any (including the ML430) will beat and feel faster than the US w126s.

eddie
Old 04-18-2004, 11:37 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
DslBnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I currently own a '97 E420. Yes, once it gets rolling, nothing can keep up with it.
Old 05-05-2004, 05:35 PM
  #23  
Newbie
 
mr.thorsten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
280 SE
Hello.
What is the maximum Octane in the US. Maybe, are the Euro engines different because of the fuel? In Germany the Octane goes up to 98 ( at one company up to 100).

So long

Thorsten
Old 05-09-2004, 03:58 AM
  #24  
Member
 
drakon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 197
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1990 560 SEC (modified), SLK55, CLK500
Highest NORMAL octane is 91, 99 can be purchased some places, and 110 can be ordered/prepared in the US.

It is the difference in engine compression (US=9.1 or so, Euro=10.1 or so) and the extra smog equipment.

eddie
Old 05-13-2004, 07:51 PM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MB AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 3,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 E55 AMG
Oh, I guess I would loose a race in a 560SEC against my friend's SC400...
BTW, the highest octane rating here is 91 (or 92)...


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: DIN Horsepower?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:38 PM.