S-Class (W220) 1999-2006: S 320 CDI, S 320, S430, S 500, S 600

Instrument Cluster Recall - S Class

Old Jun 6, 2006 | 02:17 PM
  #26  
jolleydm's Avatar
Almost a Member!
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
2001 S430
Does anyone have any updated info to share?

I am still waiting on the recall letter. Has anyone had a dealer agree to do the recall replacement yet (or received a refund for an earlier replacement)?
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 02:28 PM
  #27  
Jayhawk's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Lawrence, KS (USA)
S500/W220/2000
Still waiting... I have an A service coming up, in about 3k miles, and hope to combine the two when I go in. Will not start to worry until June 20 though. If I have heard nothing I will ask the dealer to find out.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2006 | 03:33 PM
  #28  
jolleydm's Avatar
Almost a Member!
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
2001 S430
Sadly, I've been told that my 2001 S430 is not included in the recall group. This despite the fact that my instrument cluster actually failed. (You'd think that this would go a long way toward showing that my cluster was defective, but not the case.)

I was told that my exterior weather stripping is subject to a current recall and will be replaced by the dealer free of charge, but I will have to eat the $1200 cluster replacement.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2006 | 04:03 PM
  #29  
gunnyalex7051's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Oceanside
S430
Kind of Interesting

I called Mercedes Benz and was informed the same information. I would like to find the series numbers of the one recalled. I have already paid for mine to be replaced and would love to be reimbursed for my costs.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2006 | 05:51 PM
  #30  
Jayhawk's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Lawrence, KS (USA)
S500/W220/2000
My dealer is in the dark too, so I called MBUSA and they said that NHTSA had put out information that MB has not been informed of. In fact, she said they do not even have a list of VIN's involved, so they don't know what to tell us. Apparently, there is a communication's problem between the govt. and MB. Why am I not surprised. She seemed to imply that they had not even started sending letters because they didn't know which vehicles were involved. Wierd...
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2006 | 08:19 PM
  #31  
Skylaw's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 27
From: Tampa, FL
2005 S500 4-Matic, 1978 450SL
Originally Posted by Jayhawk
My dealer is in the dark too, so I called MBUSA and they said that NHTSA had put out information that MB has not been informed of. In fact, she said they do not even have a list of VIN's involved, so they don't know what to tell us. Apparently, there is a communication's problem between the govt. and MB. Why am I not surprised. She seemed to imply that they had not even started sending letters because they didn't know which vehicles were involved. Wierd...

Jayhawk,

Apparently MB's left hand doesn't keep in touch with its right. The three documents in the link at http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/pr...fsDocId=06V028 make it very clear that MBUSA is aware of the recall. Two of the three letters are from Frank Diertl, with the letterhead identifying him as General Manager, Engineering Services, MBUSA LLC.

Diertl's February 1, 2006 letter to NHTSA says "Pursuant to the requirements of 49 C.F.R. Part 573, and on behalf of our parent company, DaimlerChrysler A.G. (DCAG), this letter advises you of a voluntary recall for certain Mercedes-Benz vehicles." The letter then goes on the describe the instrument cluster problems in detail and list the month/year of manufacture of the affected S- and CL- class cars.

On February 9, 2006 NHTSA acknowledged the recall, informed MBUSA (Mr. Diertl) of the content of the public notice of the recall it would put out (these are posted in the Federal Register and on the safercar.gov website), and asked MBUSA to make any corrections.

Diertl's letter of March 2, 2006 responding to the February 9 NHTSA letter states that notification to customers would commence on or about June 10, 2006. That in turn gets us to the very first post in this string.

Thus, NHTSA has put out absolutely nothing that MB is not aware of. The documentation shows clearly that MB initiated its own voluntary recall under the Department of Transportation/NHTSA rules under the Code of Federal Regulations. It shows that MBUSA is telling NHTSA that it has identified a series of problems with instrument clusters and telling NHTSA what MBUSA intends to do under the governing regulations. MB's own response to the NHTSA letter says notice to customers of the recall would begin on or about June 10, 2006.

While the February 1 MBUSA letter indicates dates of manufacture of certain cars and not VINs, it stretches credibility past the breaking point for MBUSA to say they don't know which vehicles are involved. I have seen too many MB records indicating that certain VINS were manufactured on certain dates. Whomever you spoke with at MBUSA is either ignorant of what is going on or just plain lying.

This isn't a matter of a "communications problem" between MB and the government. The communications are quite clear. It is also apparently untrue that MB isn't sending recall notices - see benznodubz' June 2 post above. They are slow about it - I speculate perhaps because of parts availability (more than 36,000 cars are affected, according to Mr. Diertl) - but I hope you will call whomever you spoke to at MBUSA and make them painfully aware of the facts.

Now, getting them to act may be an entirely different matter.

Last edited by Skylaw; Jun 23, 2006 at 09:10 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2006 | 11:33 PM
  #32  
Pristine's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 290
Likes: 8
From: MD
2014 E350 4Matic
I called MBUSA cutomer service couple of times to get status on the recall. Both times I was told that they are not aware of this recall, nor do they see it in their system. Their standard response is that once they know, they will mail us the notice. The local dealers don't seem to be aware of it either. Makes me wonder if they really don't know or wheather they are just keeping thier mouth shut on this issue for now.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 02:18 AM
  #33  
Vader55's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 1
From: OC
AMG E55, Stage 1, Strait Pipe from Primary Cats
Originally Posted by benznodubz
I got the recall letter from MB already but have not went in yet
Correction, My letter was not for the cluster.. apologies.
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 12:59 PM
  #34  
Jayhawk's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Lawrence, KS (USA)
S500/W220/2000
Originally Posted by Skylaw
Jayhawk,

Apparently MB's left hand doesn't keep in touch with its right. The three documents in the link at http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/pr...fsDocId=06V028 make it very clear that MBUSA is aware of the recall. Two of the three letters are from Frank Diertl, with the letterhead identifying him as General Manager, Engineering Services, MBUSA LLC.

Diertl's February 1, 2006 letter to NHTSA says "Pursuant to the requirements of 49 C.F.R. Part 573, and on behalf of our parent company, DaimlerChrysler A.G. (DCAG), this letter advises you of a voluntary recall for certain Mercedes-Benz vehicles." The letter then goes on the describe the instrument cluster problems in detail and list the month/year of manufacture of the affected S- and CL- class cars.

On February 9, 2006 NHTSA acknowledged the recall, informed MBUSA (Mr. Diertl) of the content of the public notice of the recall it would put out (these are posted in the Federal Register and on the safercar.gov website), and asked MBUSA to make any corrections.

Diertl's letter of March 2, 2006 responding to the February 9 NHTSA letter states that notification to customers would commence on or about June 10, 2006. That in turn gets us to the very first post in this string.

Thus, NHTSA has put out absolutely nothing that MB is not aware of. The documentation shows clearly that MB initiated its own voluntary recall under the Department of Transportation/NHTSA rules under the Code of Federal Regulations. It shows that MBUSA is telling NHTSA that it has identified a series of problems with instrument clusters and telling NHTSA what MBUSA intends to do under the governing regulations. MB's own response to the NHTSA letter says notice to customers of the recall would begin on or about June 10, 2006.

While the February 1 MBUSA letter indicates dates of manufacture of certain cars and not VINs, it stretches credibility past the breaking point for MBUSA to say they don't know which vehicles are involved. I have seen too many MB records indicating that certain VINS were manufactured on certain dates. Whomever you spoke with at MBUSA is either ignorant of what is going on or just plain lying.

This isn't a matter of a "communications problem" between MB and the government. The communications are quite clear. It is also apparently untrue that MB isn't sending recall notices - see benznodubz' June 2 post above. They are slow about it - I speculate perhaps because of parts availability (more than 36,000 cars are affected, according to Mr. Diertl) - but I hope you will call whomever you spoke to at MBUSA and make them painfully aware of the facts.

Now, getting them to act may be an entirely different matter.
Thanks Sky! I am sure you are correct: I am getting the runaround. The gal I spoke w/ didn't give me her name, so not sure I can go back at her. What she told me was that "NHTSA has not given MB the list of cars involved." I said shouldn't you be providing the list, and she said that's not how it works. She also said "they were very aware of the recall, and were getting a lot of calls," but they could not notify us until they had the list. I suspect you are correct too about availability of parts being an issue. She sounded very concerned and somewhat frustrated by all of this, and may very well have been telling me what her boss told her.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 01:21 PM
  #35  
Jayhawk's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Lawrence, KS (USA)
S500/W220/2000
Originally Posted by benznodubz
Correction, My letter was not for the cluster.. apologies.
Then no one has received a recall letter...

If anyone has, please let us know. In fact, scan it into a .jpg file and post it for us to see. MB can't argue w/ that!
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 01:37 PM
  #36  
Skylaw's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 27
From: Tampa, FL
2005 S500 4-Matic, 1978 450SL
Originally Posted by Jayhawk
What she told me was that "NHTSA has not given MB the list of cars involved."

Now, that absolutely tops the list for BS. NHTSA doesn't "give" MB a list of the VINs to recall. MB does that for itself. MB knows the dates of manufacture of the affected cars (and listed them in its letter); MB's own records identify the VINs.

NHTSA's role is to identify problems reported to it by the public to a manufacturer;the manufacturer may have identified the same problems through its own service departments. If not, NHTSA would order the manufacturer to work to identify the extent of the problem. Even in that case, the manufacturer would be required to identify the vehicles. if NHTSA thought a recall were necessary and the manufacturer did not, then NHTSA could order an involuntary recall.

In most cases, as it seems here, manufacturers initiate voluntary recalls, regardless of the source of information. In this particular case, it seems MB self-identified the problem, and its extent, in the February 1 letter; and notified NHTSA that it was initiating a voluntary recall. No NHTSA "intervention" or order was required.

And since you can provide your VIN to any MB dealer and they can tell you the car's date of manufacture (as well as its engine, color, options, and a host of other info), I am equally certain MB can access the VINs of their cars from date of manufacture, in their own database.

MBUSA is feeding you garbage, Jayhawk!

Last edited by Skylaw; Jun 24, 2006 at 01:53 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 01:29 PM
  #37  
jolleydm's Avatar
Almost a Member!
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
2001 S430
To be clear, when I called MB, I gave them my VIN and then I was told that my car is not currently subject to a recall involving the insrument cluster. Maybe this just means that nobody's VIN has yet been approved for the instrument cluster recall.

I have new hope now that when (and if) MB ever gets around to implementing this recall, my 2001 S430 with the failed instrument cluster may in fact be included.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 01:53 PM
  #38  
Jayhawk's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Lawrence, KS (USA)
S500/W220/2000
Originally Posted by jolleydm
To be clear, when I called MB, I gave them my VIN and then I was told that my car is not currently subject to a recall involving the insrument cluster. Maybe this just means that nobody's VIN has yet been approved for the instrument cluster recall.

I have new hope now that when (and if) MB ever gets around to implementing this recall, my 2001 S430 with the failed instrument cluster may in fact be included.
Don't hold your breath...
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 09:48 PM
  #39  
fcalero's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Need broken cluster

I have a 2000 CL 500 that was originally sold in Canada. I am looking to replace the KM/H speedometer to MPH version. I know that digital readout can go both ways but the numbers are KM/H only since it is a Canadian car. I was wondering if somone has a broken cluster they want to sell me (for cheap since it's broken). I will attempt to replace the face only so I dont care if the cluster electrical components are not functioning. I believe S and Cl are interchangeable.

Thanks,

fredcalero@comcast.net
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 10:43 PM
  #40  
Jayhawk's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Lawrence, KS (USA)
S500/W220/2000
Originally Posted by fcalero
I have a 2000 CL 500 that was originally sold in Canada. I am looking to replace the KM/H speedometer to MPH version. I know that digital readout can go both ways but the numbers are KM/H only since it is a Canadian car. I was wondering if somone has a broken cluster they want to sell me (for cheap since it's broken). I will attempt to replace the face only so I dont care if the cluster electrical components are not functioning. I believe S and Cl are interchangeable.

Thanks,

fredcalero@comcast.net
I thought our clusters could be changed from kmph to mph and back w/ the flip of a switch on our COMAND menu. I am wrong?
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 10:50 PM
  #41  
fcalero's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
I cant speak for all Canadian CL's but mine only has KM/H on the number display. I can change the digital readout to both KM/H and MPH. I did go to the dealer and they confirmed that I need to buy a new cluster for over $1500 plus 2 hours to program it. I'm pretty sure I can just replace the front readout. I noticed that US versions do have the MPH in large nubers and the KM/H in small numbers. Mine only has KM/H in large numbers.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2006 | 09:02 PM
  #42  
hawk20's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 233
Likes: 1
From: Lymington Hampshire UK
E220cdi Estate Avantgarde March 2008
Originally Posted by T0ked
Actually had this fixed while car was under warranty. Half the lights on the speedo went out and the temp gauge was all over the place. Brought the car in scared it was over heating. They replaced with a new cluster about 3 months before th original factory warranty expired. Will I still need to follow the TSB?
Worth checking with dealer as it depends whether what they fitted was the post recall type or the pre recall type.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2006 | 09:05 PM
  #43  
hawk20's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 233
Likes: 1
From: Lymington Hampshire UK
E220cdi Estate Avantgarde March 2008
Question

BTW according to my dealer the recall does not apply in UK where different type of cluster is used compared to US. Anyone in UK heard different from that, please??
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2006 | 07:04 AM
  #44  
KevinJ's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 122
Likes: 1
From: UK
S500
Nope...

Took mine to the dealer and they checked if Goodwill would be done and the answer was NO.

Still waiting for the BBE Reman company here in the UK to obtain the chips needed to fix the faded, flickering cluster.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2006 | 08:53 AM
  #45  
hawk20's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 233
Likes: 1
From: Lymington Hampshire UK
E220cdi Estate Avantgarde March 2008
Originally Posted by KevinJ
Took mine to the dealer and they checked if Goodwill would be done and the answer was NO.

Still waiting for the BBE Reman company here in the UK to obtain the chips needed to fix the faded, flickering cluster.
I'd be tempted to get on to Merc Customer Service and mention US recall. Could be part of same problem???
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2006 | 11:22 AM
  #46  
justbecause's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 99
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Jayhawk
I thought our clusters could be changed from kmph to mph and back w/ the flip of a switch on our COMAND menu. I am wrong?
No, The large KMH outer ring is there for good,there is a smaller MPH inner ring on most Canadian cars, (just as most cars sold in USA have a smaller KMH inner ring in case you drive in Mex or Can.
The only think you can flip between via command(kilos or miles)is the odometer for distance travelled.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2006 | 04:52 PM
  #47  
normrkey's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
2002 S500
Does anyone know how to decode the date of manufacture or is there a location on the car that indicates this?

I am not sure if my car is part of the recall.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2006 | 05:10 PM
  #48  
Jayhawk's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Lawrence, KS (USA)
S500/W220/2000
Originally Posted by normrkey
Does anyone know how to decode the date of manufacture or is there a location on the car that indicates this?

I am not sure if my car is part of the recall.
Don't feel bad. If you believe MB dealers, they don't even know which cars are included. I'm getting the feeling they just don't want to do it.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2006 | 09:36 PM
  #49  
highdeserthiker's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
ever get the feeling you are being lied to

My experience with MB is that they rarely step up to the plate and admit fault, let alone compensate you unless forced to do so.I love these cars , but hate the dealerships. I am sure, like many others on here that own these cars , we love theses cars; but own other cars too,(we have a Hyundai Tucson, and to be frank, their after sales and service set up is so much better than MB. I feel we often allow ourselves to accept high service fees,poor service , shoddy standards ,ect, because of a number of reasons,(maybe I would look like a fool for buying a car that costs so much time and money to keep on the road?) kinda interesting that Jags now appear to be in many areas( JD Powers ect) a better buy the last few years.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2006 | 10:21 PM
  #50  
Jayhawk's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Lawrence, KS (USA)
S500/W220/2000
Originally Posted by highdeserthiker
My experience with MB is that they rarely step up to the plate and admit fault, let alone compensate you unless forced to do so.I love these cars , but hate the dealerships. I am sure, like many others on here that own these cars , we love theses cars; but own other cars too,(we have a Hyundai Tucson, and to be frank, their after sales and service set up is so much better than MB. I feel we often allow ourselves to accept high service fees,poor service , shoddy standards ,ect, because of a number of reasons,(maybe I would look like a fool for buying a car that costs so much time and money to keep on the road?) kinda interesting that Jags now appear to be in many areas( JD Powers ect) a better buy the last few years.
I suspect that the dealers are not the problem. They are only as knowledgeable as MBUSA allows them to be. I think they are often at the mercy of MBUSA and cannot tell us any more that they know. And MBUSA is sometimes out of the loop w/ regard to these recalls. After all I believe MBUSA actually initiated this recall. So it may be that they just don't have the replacement parts and are stalling until they do.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 8 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:19 AM.

story-0
New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes-AMG's new electric GT 4-Door Coupe trades combustion for software, synthetic noise, and more than 1,100 horsepower.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-20 20:08:15


VIEW MORE
story-1
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-2
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-3
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-4
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-5
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-6
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-8
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-9
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE