Instrument Cluster Recall - S Class
I am still waiting on the recall letter. Has anyone had a dealer agree to do the recall replacement yet (or received a refund for an earlier replacement)?
I was told that my exterior weather stripping is subject to a current recall and will be replaced by the dealer free of charge, but I will have to eat the $1200 cluster replacement.

Jayhawk,
Apparently MB's left hand doesn't keep in touch with its right. The three documents in the link at http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/pr...fsDocId=06V028 make it very clear that MBUSA is aware of the recall. Two of the three letters are from Frank Diertl, with the letterhead identifying him as General Manager, Engineering Services, MBUSA LLC.
Diertl's February 1, 2006 letter to NHTSA says "Pursuant to the requirements of 49 C.F.R. Part 573, and on behalf of our parent company, DaimlerChrysler A.G. (DCAG), this letter advises you of a voluntary recall for certain Mercedes-Benz vehicles." The letter then goes on the describe the instrument cluster problems in detail and list the month/year of manufacture of the affected S- and CL- class cars.
On February 9, 2006 NHTSA acknowledged the recall, informed MBUSA (Mr. Diertl) of the content of the public notice of the recall it would put out (these are posted in the Federal Register and on the safercar.gov website), and asked MBUSA to make any corrections.
Diertl's letter of March 2, 2006 responding to the February 9 NHTSA letter states that notification to customers would commence on or about June 10, 2006. That in turn gets us to the very first post in this string.
Thus, NHTSA has put out absolutely nothing that MB is not aware of. The documentation shows clearly that MB initiated its own voluntary recall under the Department of Transportation/NHTSA rules under the Code of Federal Regulations. It shows that MBUSA is telling NHTSA that it has identified a series of problems with instrument clusters and telling NHTSA what MBUSA intends to do under the governing regulations. MB's own response to the NHTSA letter says notice to customers of the recall would begin on or about June 10, 2006.
While the February 1 MBUSA letter indicates dates of manufacture of certain cars and not VINs, it stretches credibility past the breaking point for MBUSA to say they don't know which vehicles are involved. I have seen too many MB records indicating that certain VINS were manufactured on certain dates. Whomever you spoke with at MBUSA is either ignorant of what is going on or just plain lying.
This isn't a matter of a "communications problem" between MB and the government. The communications are quite clear. It is also apparently untrue that MB isn't sending recall notices - see benznodubz' June 2 post above. They are slow about it - I speculate perhaps because of parts availability (more than 36,000 cars are affected, according to Mr. Diertl) - but I hope you will call whomever you spoke to at MBUSA and make them painfully aware of the facts.

Now, getting them to act may be an entirely different matter.
Last edited by Skylaw; Jun 23, 2006 at 09:10 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Apparently MB's left hand doesn't keep in touch with its right. The three documents in the link at http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/pr...fsDocId=06V028 make it very clear that MBUSA is aware of the recall. Two of the three letters are from Frank Diertl, with the letterhead identifying him as General Manager, Engineering Services, MBUSA LLC.
Diertl's February 1, 2006 letter to NHTSA says "Pursuant to the requirements of 49 C.F.R. Part 573, and on behalf of our parent company, DaimlerChrysler A.G. (DCAG), this letter advises you of a voluntary recall for certain Mercedes-Benz vehicles." The letter then goes on the describe the instrument cluster problems in detail and list the month/year of manufacture of the affected S- and CL- class cars.
On February 9, 2006 NHTSA acknowledged the recall, informed MBUSA (Mr. Diertl) of the content of the public notice of the recall it would put out (these are posted in the Federal Register and on the safercar.gov website), and asked MBUSA to make any corrections.
Diertl's letter of March 2, 2006 responding to the February 9 NHTSA letter states that notification to customers would commence on or about June 10, 2006. That in turn gets us to the very first post in this string.
Thus, NHTSA has put out absolutely nothing that MB is not aware of. The documentation shows clearly that MB initiated its own voluntary recall under the Department of Transportation/NHTSA rules under the Code of Federal Regulations. It shows that MBUSA is telling NHTSA that it has identified a series of problems with instrument clusters and telling NHTSA what MBUSA intends to do under the governing regulations. MB's own response to the NHTSA letter says notice to customers of the recall would begin on or about June 10, 2006.
While the February 1 MBUSA letter indicates dates of manufacture of certain cars and not VINs, it stretches credibility past the breaking point for MBUSA to say they don't know which vehicles are involved. I have seen too many MB records indicating that certain VINS were manufactured on certain dates. Whomever you spoke with at MBUSA is either ignorant of what is going on or just plain lying.
This isn't a matter of a "communications problem" between MB and the government. The communications are quite clear. It is also apparently untrue that MB isn't sending recall notices - see benznodubz' June 2 post above. They are slow about it - I speculate perhaps because of parts availability (more than 36,000 cars are affected, according to Mr. Diertl) - but I hope you will call whomever you spoke to at MBUSA and make them painfully aware of the facts.

Now, getting them to act may be an entirely different matter.

If anyone has, please let us know. In fact, scan it into a .jpg file and post it for us to see. MB can't argue w/ that!

Now, that absolutely tops the list for BS. NHTSA doesn't "give" MB a list of the VINs to recall. MB does that for itself. MB knows the dates of manufacture of the affected cars (and listed them in its letter); MB's own records identify the VINs.
NHTSA's role is to identify problems reported to it by the public to a manufacturer;the manufacturer may have identified the same problems through its own service departments. If not, NHTSA would order the manufacturer to work to identify the extent of the problem. Even in that case, the manufacturer would be required to identify the vehicles. if NHTSA thought a recall were necessary and the manufacturer did not, then NHTSA could order an involuntary recall.
In most cases, as it seems here, manufacturers initiate voluntary recalls, regardless of the source of information. In this particular case, it seems MB self-identified the problem, and its extent, in the February 1 letter; and notified NHTSA that it was initiating a voluntary recall. No NHTSA "intervention" or order was required.
And since you can provide your VIN to any MB dealer and they can tell you the car's date of manufacture (as well as its engine, color, options, and a host of other info), I am equally certain MB can access the VINs of their cars from date of manufacture, in their own database.
MBUSA is feeding you garbage, Jayhawk!
Last edited by Skylaw; Jun 24, 2006 at 01:53 PM.
I have new hope now that when (and if) MB ever gets around to implementing this recall, my 2001 S430 with the failed instrument cluster may in fact be included.
I have new hope now that when (and if) MB ever gets around to implementing this recall, my 2001 S430 with the failed instrument cluster may in fact be included.
Thanks,
fredcalero@comcast.net
Thanks,
fredcalero@comcast.net
Still waiting for the BBE Reman company here in the UK to obtain the chips needed to fix the faded, flickering cluster.
Still waiting for the BBE Reman company here in the UK to obtain the chips needed to fix the faded, flickering cluster.


The only think you can flip between via command(kilos or miles)is the odometer for distance travelled.
I am not sure if my car is part of the recall.





