Regular Gas
Federal Regulations require autos sold in the U.S. 'be capable' of running on gasoline with a rating '87 ' with up to 10% ethanol and has a specified amount of detergent that will keep the engine clean enough to meet the emissions limits for 50,000 miles---if maintained and operated within manufacturers operating and maintenance requirements stated in the Owners Manual. The EPA fuel economy and emissions testing is conducted with a special 'certification fuel' that is much better in all respects than '87.' That Certification fuel has much more detergent and is much higher in 'octane' than '87.'
These modern engines now have 'knock sensors' that detect harmful 'detonation' (which is perceived as 'knocking' or 'rattling'). Detonation is spontaneous combustion of the as yet unburned portion of the fuel/air mixture. This 'detonation' reduces power produced, fuel economy, and causes excess heating of the detonating piston and its parts. Detonation can be very mild--called 'trace knock' or very harsh. Trace knock is generally the maximum allowed by the 'knock sensor' and ECU ignition timing controls. VERY LOW anti-knock property (low octane) can 'knock' so badly the ignition timing reduction cannot keep the engine from knocking badly. HEAVY knocking will damage engines, often breaking the top piston rings and pistons, leading to total engine destruction. Driving carefully under light loading will reduce knocking tendency often avoiding any knocking. However, even brief heavy detonation can damage the pistons and piston rings, ruining the engine.
A more serious 'knocking' , called 'Pre-ignition' can occur when 'detonation' is heavy and prolonged. 'Pre-ignition' is when the fuel/air mixture ignites BEFORE the ignition spark ignites it.. Pre-ignition causes much higher 'explosive' pressure in the cylinder and can destroy pistons (and the engine) in a very short time. Pre-ignition will typically happen under higher loads after a few seconds of 'Detonation', or if deposits in the combustion chamber begin to 'glow.' 'Pre-ignition' can occur at cruise speeds and may not be audible over other noise, with the operator unaware until there is significant power loss or engine damage results. The modern 'knock sensors' may not detect 'Pre-ignition' because the explosive vibrations are of different frequency than 'Detonation' caused vibrations. Retarding ignition timing may not stop 'Pre-ignition' once it has begun. Only immediate load reduction is effective.
To summarize, one should always use a fuel having high enough anti-knock property ('octane') to avoid both 'Detonation' and 'Pre-ignition' from occurring during their daily driving to avoid engine damage.
Driving 10,000 miles a year averaging 20 miles per gallon uses 500 gallons of fuel. At a price savings of even $0.20 per gallon, the potential savings is only $100 a year. IF a cost difference of $100 a year is meaningful to a Mercedes Owner, that Owner might better by served by a much lower cost vehicle.
These modern engines now have 'knock sensors' that detect harmful 'detonation' (which is perceived as 'knocking' or 'rattling'). Detonation is spontaneous combustion of the as yet unburned portion of the fuel/air mixture. This 'detonation' reduces power produced, fuel economy, and causes excess heating of the detonating piston and its parts. Detonation can be very mild--called 'trace knock' or very harsh. Trace knock is generally the maximum allowed by the 'knock sensor' and ECU ignition timing controls. VERY LOW anti-knock property (low octane) can 'knock' so badly the ignition timing reduction cannot keep the engine from knocking badly. HEAVY knocking will damage engines, often breaking the top piston rings and pistons, leading to total engine destruction. Driving carefully under light loading will reduce knocking tendency often avoiding any knocking. However, even brief heavy detonation can damage the pistons and piston rings, ruining the engine.
A more serious 'knocking' , called 'Pre-ignition' can occur when 'detonation' is heavy and prolonged. 'Pre-ignition' is when the fuel/air mixture ignites BEFORE the ignition spark ignites it.. Pre-ignition causes much higher 'explosive' pressure in the cylinder and can destroy pistons (and the engine) in a very short time. Pre-ignition will typically happen under higher loads after a few seconds of 'Detonation', or if deposits in the combustion chamber begin to 'glow.' 'Pre-ignition' can occur at cruise speeds and may not be audible over other noise, with the operator unaware until there is significant power loss or engine damage results. The modern 'knock sensors' may not detect 'Pre-ignition' because the explosive vibrations are of different frequency than 'Detonation' caused vibrations. Retarding ignition timing may not stop 'Pre-ignition' once it has begun. Only immediate load reduction is effective.
To summarize, one should always use a fuel having high enough anti-knock property ('octane') to avoid both 'Detonation' and 'Pre-ignition' from occurring during their daily driving to avoid engine damage.
Driving 10,000 miles a year averaging 20 miles per gallon uses 500 gallons of fuel. At a price savings of even $0.20 per gallon, the potential savings is only $100 a year. IF a cost difference of $100 a year is meaningful to a Mercedes Owner, that Owner might better by served by a much lower cost vehicle.
Been doing some more reading about this over the last year or so.
According to SDS, the octane readings that you can set for the car are based on RON (Research Octane Number). There's also MON (Motor Octane Number), which is typically about 10-12 points lower than RON. In Europe, they use strictly RON. Here in the United States, we average RON and MON (the formula is {RON + MON} / 2).
What this means is that our "87 octane" regular gasoline actually has something like a 92 or 93 RON. Remember that the max setting in SDS is 93 (and that's RON). That's why burning regular gas works so well in the M112/M113 engines; apparently even with the 10:1 compression ratio, our engines were designed to run well on what we would consider pretty "bad" gasoline (think 84 octane {RON + MON} / 2). At higher altitudes, they do sell 85 octane gasoline, so this info is also applicable to, say, folks in Denver, CO metro area or the Mexico City metro area. But at anything even approaching sea level, 87 octane (US spec) has a high enough RON to be just fine.
Now, in a forced-induction engine like my S600 TT, or an S55 AMG, I would use 93-octane ({RON + MON} / 2) gasoline due to the greater air pressure provided by the super/turbo-charging.
According to SDS, the octane readings that you can set for the car are based on RON (Research Octane Number). There's also MON (Motor Octane Number), which is typically about 10-12 points lower than RON. In Europe, they use strictly RON. Here in the United States, we average RON and MON (the formula is {RON + MON} / 2).
What this means is that our "87 octane" regular gasoline actually has something like a 92 or 93 RON. Remember that the max setting in SDS is 93 (and that's RON). That's why burning regular gas works so well in the M112/M113 engines; apparently even with the 10:1 compression ratio, our engines were designed to run well on what we would consider pretty "bad" gasoline (think 84 octane {RON + MON} / 2). At higher altitudes, they do sell 85 octane gasoline, so this info is also applicable to, say, folks in Denver, CO metro area or the Mexico City metro area. But at anything even approaching sea level, 87 octane (US spec) has a high enough RON to be just fine.
Now, in a forced-induction engine like my S600 TT, or an S55 AMG, I would use 93-octane ({RON + MON} / 2) gasoline due to the greater air pressure provided by the super/turbo-charging.
Last edited by cowboyt; Sep 3, 2019 at 10:40 AM.
Good to know! I put regular in my car last fill up and it made no difference whatsoever in how the car runs. I think I'll keep doing that, considering it's an extra $0.40 per gallon to use premium.
The only thing odd is how out of touch with reality that post and those stickers on your fuel door are.
the 126 is Ancient and so is VERY high octane premuim fuel.. Like everything else what we see today is a company that STILL is not up to date with the pulse of the world in so many ways...
BTW. when I mentioned the places in the world I meant this decade... I'm sure you did find many place with 93 and higher octane back in the day when premuim unleaded was called "Super" here in the US.
Nowadays the Octace rating is measured by the amount of ethanol that actally exists in the fuel (Read the sticker at the pump).. so all of the fuels we use today are "cut".
But who cares.. and I don't believe that carbon build up story either.. Neither would any other person who knows how engines realy work.. You know how many miles and how much abuse would have to occur for that to happen??? It's not even realistic..
Carbon build-up doesn't come from low octane fuel necessarily, but more from buildup of unburned fuel.. Detonation is the result of fuel buring too fast so how can that even logically make sense? not to mention the shear amount of carbon that would have to reside in a cylinder and how hard it would have to get in order to cause the damages you described, and it all happening withinn a waranty period...
I don't buy that and still stick to my opinion that even if it were possible I would NEVER see a shop be able to legally void a warranty as a result..
PLUS, if a bad engine is diagnosed, the entire engine is removed and replaced on a warranty because of the labor involved in a tearown and How many menz dealears do onsite rebuilds? none. That story is a dud.
the 126 is Ancient and so is VERY high octane premuim fuel.. Like everything else what we see today is a company that STILL is not up to date with the pulse of the world in so many ways...
BTW. when I mentioned the places in the world I meant this decade... I'm sure you did find many place with 93 and higher octane back in the day when premuim unleaded was called "Super" here in the US.
Nowadays the Octace rating is measured by the amount of ethanol that actally exists in the fuel (Read the sticker at the pump).. so all of the fuels we use today are "cut".
But who cares.. and I don't believe that carbon build up story either.. Neither would any other person who knows how engines realy work.. You know how many miles and how much abuse would have to occur for that to happen??? It's not even realistic..
Carbon build-up doesn't come from low octane fuel necessarily, but more from buildup of unburned fuel.. Detonation is the result of fuel buring too fast so how can that even logically make sense? not to mention the shear amount of carbon that would have to reside in a cylinder and how hard it would have to get in order to cause the damages you described, and it all happening withinn a waranty period...
I don't buy that and still stick to my opinion that even if it were possible I would NEVER see a shop be able to legally void a warranty as a result..
PLUS, if a bad engine is diagnosed, the entire engine is removed and replaced on a warranty because of the labor involved in a tearown and How many menz dealears do onsite rebuilds? none. That story is a dud.
It’s very simple , for the normally aspirated cars you can use 87 and just don’t race it - keep throttle below 2/3 and rpm below 3000. This is how 90% of people drive anyway . Most people report absolutely no benefit from higher octane in these Models without turbo or supercharger .
For the supercharged s55 and turbo s600, they will have substantial performance reduction and increased possibility of detonation so you really do benefit from 91/93.
For the supercharged s55 and turbo s600, they will have substantial performance reduction and increased possibility of detonation so you really do benefit from 91/93.
You should also go by the fuel consumption per mile. and in the long term also if the fuel has a good cleaning effect on the engine. if the engine sounds rougher, it could be a sign that the fuel lubricates worse or maybe that the octane content is just at the limit for the engine



