Would you buy a repo'ed S600?

05 S600 with 42,000 miles
or
03 S600 with 25,000 miles
Both equally equipped, both acceptable colors, condition and similar Autocheck scores (doesn't mean much), basically the same. I always felt the newest model with the least amount of miles possible, but the 03 is in really good condition.
rondocap, thanks for the heads up, I'll check out the thread in the AMg forum!

03 S600 25,000miles = $29,900
05 S600 42,000miles = $28,900
My only concern with the 03, is some of the inherent "flaws" may be more likely to still be present. As opposed to the 05 where some of those items may be engineered out of the car over the subsequent two years. Does this seem logical?
rondocap, I had read that thread in the AMG forum, but there are some recent additions. Seems to be pretty standard replies coming from the AMG forum...good stuff!
Excellent price for the '05!

05 S55 with 46,500miles = $33,990
equally equipped as the S600, rear seat package, keyless go, rear side window curtains, burl walnut, electric trunk closure
05 S600 with 42,000miles = $28,900
Both are 1 owner cars. Both cost the same for a four year Chrysler warranty, whatever the best warranty is called. These are not located at the same dealer, so driving them both will be hard, so it may be simply driving an example of both, then deciding, then buying.
Thanks for the input!
Even if it only had the factory 4yr 50k mile warranty, that car was under warranty all the way through last year, so any defect was likely fixed under warranty.
the 2003 may have been out of warranty since 2007 (if the prior owners didnt have an extended warranty) . Not only was that the first year of the twinturbo engine, its more likely some issues may not have been addressed if it hasnt been under warranty the past 3 years
Last edited by rondocap; Mar 3, 2010 at 05:50 PM. Reason: a
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

B.







