S-Class (W220) 1999-2006: S 320 CDI, S 320, S430, S 500, S 600

Thinking of trading CLK for S....430 or 500?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-23-2003, 02:17 PM
  #1  
TNH
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
TNH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thinking of trading CLK for S....430 or 500?

I am thinking of selling my 02 CLK 430 for a sedan. I am not really interested in going fast with such a big car, so do I really need the 500? Will I be happy with the regular driveability of the 430, or is it sluggush and underpowered compared to the 500?
Old 12-25-2003, 05:25 PM
  #2  
TNH
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
TNH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No one else went over this decision when purchasing an S class?
Old 12-25-2003, 06:52 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
AMGLAB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 CLS63
I found it impossible to tell the difference by driving.
Old 12-25-2003, 11:34 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
bmms8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,110
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
MB
Originally posted by AMGLAB
I found it impossible to tell the difference by driving.
you couldnt tell the difference between the two cars? i would go with a 430 just because its a lot cheaper, the lexus ls430 is actually faster than your CLK though and its cheaper than the S, GL
Old 12-25-2003, 11:52 PM
  #5  
Out Of Control!!
 
vraa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 28,933
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Go for the 500, the extra torque and hp is worth it, along with the few extra options that come standard.
Old 12-26-2003, 01:14 AM
  #6  
Super Member
 
Caliz_Finest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you couldnt tell the difference between the two cars? i would go with a 430 just because its a lot cheaper, the lexus ls430 is actually faster than your CLK though and its cheaper than the S, GL
A CLK430 is faster than a LS430.
Old 12-26-2003, 01:16 AM
  #7  
Super Member
 
Caliz_Finest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Go for the S500 if youre willing to spend the extra money and think an extra 30 hp is worth it. If you do go with the 430 get the options that come standard with the 500 like nappa leather, bi-xenons and the nicer wood.
Old 01-02-2004, 06:12 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Silver_Lana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY/NJ
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just so you know... you ought to take a test drive in the S500 and see how you like it. The car is HUGE!
In my opinion, i think comming from from a CLK, an E500 might be more to your taste. Drive them both and see how you feel.

Cheers!
Old 01-02-2004, 06:31 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
bmms8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,110
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
MB
i dunno how, CLK 430 werent that fast were they, i dont think they were under 6 sec for 0-60, a LA is 5.9 with the lowest c of d in the world i believe, it also has much more hp and torque
Old 01-02-2004, 06:34 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Richard Galing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: SFV, Ca.
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W210, W220, W163, W164, C6
Definitely go with the S500...as stated the extra power & options are well worth it...Also, it seems to retain better resale value than the S430, at least through my impressions when I tried to trade mine in for a 55.
Old 01-06-2004, 12:11 AM
  #11  
Super Member
 
Caliz_Finest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i dunno how, CLK 430 werent that fast were they, i dont think they were under 6 sec for 0-60, a LA is 5.9 with the lowest c of d in the world i believe, it also has much more hp and torque
The time MB gives for the CLK 430 is 0-60 in 6.1 seconds. Ive never heard of 5.9 sec for the LS430 anywhere. The fastest time Ive ever seen for the LS430 was 6.1. So maybe their around the same speed.
Old 01-06-2004, 06:01 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
WannaBeAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Minneeeesoootah
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
for sure go with the 500. its well worth it. from the tests ive seen its about 1-1.5 sec quicker than a 430 to 60 mph. quite a difference. then consider that it comes much better equipped as mentioned.
Old 01-07-2004, 10:23 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
sportlichE430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: oak brook, il
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you've got the extra cash to blow and want the few extra hp the s500 is nice. Otherwise, the s430 is fine.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Thinking of trading CLK for S....430 or 500?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:51 AM.