Considering 05 s600.... Reliable?
Example... We had a car come in with rod knock (spun bearings).
They ONLY covered the bearing that actually spun... Not the entire crank, or labor for anything other than what was directly involved with those specific spun bearings... They only paid for remanufactured crank, etc... God. Awful. The customer was left paying the remaining balance of the work, whatever deductible they had, etc. Really no cost savings to them at all, after paying for that warranty.
I really would prefer selling my spyder first before leapimg into something else... So time to get it buttoned up and listed... This should be fun!
I really would prefer selling my spyder first before leapimg into something else... So time to get it buttoned up and listed... This should be fun!
I'm sure we could figure something out on these cars but I know how much work it is trying to do that from scratch...so I just went with what was available.



I replaced the stock 275's with 285's on the rear and put 255's on the front.They fit on the stock wheels with no issues. This provided a surprising increase in traction.
I replaced the stock 275's with 285's on the rear and put 255's on the front.They fit on the stock wheels with no issues. This provided a surprising increase in traction.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
These days USAA offers a good warranty without the typical shady bs
So while warranties generally are nothing but shady companies and frustration from Denials, Mercedes buyers are more intelligent and have been able to find the good warranties
The big gotcha with these cars, I think, is that if injectors really can't be scaled in the computer then we would hit a brick wall somewhere around 780hp crank HP if everything was linear. Not the end of the world, that's pretty good, but it's not the whole picture. I'm not sure it is linear. From what I've been able to find, the fuel pressure is fixed at (if I recall correctly) 55psi, regardless of intake manifold pressure. The fuel pump controller has no knowledge of boost pressure, and there is no regulator up front, just a relief valve in the fuel filter and pressure is maintained by the pump controller through pump duty cycle via feedback from a nearby pressure sensor.
So in my mind, the scaling in the computer has to adjust for higher manifold pressures by assuming progressively lower and lower effective fuel flow. I mean if we're 55psi rail pressure and have 25psi of boost, that's only 30psi across the injector. Which means our 340ish static flow @43.5psi injectors become 280s. 280x12x60/1000=201.6 liters per hour=53.25 gallons = 323 lb/hr * 12/60 = 64.67 lb/min of airflow capability at typical 12:1 AFRs, or only about 650hp to max out the injectors at safe AFRs, or a bit over 700 even at extremely aggressive AFRs typically reserved for naturally aspirated vehicles. My scratch pad math seems to line up with the RC engineering calculators @ 100% duty cycle and .50 BSFC (which is 12:1 AFR). Since I know a lot of people don't like to go over 80% or so injector duty cycle and I'm assuming you and Hans are in that group...that means you are basically going to max out this car's "safe" potential with just a mail-order tune from one of the vendor's, and basic intake/exhaust improvements.
I don't see any easy workaround...I mean we can pretty easily increase fuel pressure to improve flow rate, but if there's no way to tell the computer that you've done that, then it's going to hit fuel cut (if that's how Mercedes ECUs respond to a calculated need in excess of 100% duty cycle like the 3000GT ECUs do). I think the trick would have to be to scale the MAP sensor signal like you would with an AFC, but it's going to be a trickier proposition than just a fixed % correction since the ECU is making much more complicated calculations based off that value (changes with IAT, RPM, etc) than it would a mass air flow signal. I don't know if there's a device setup for doing AFC type stuff with a map sensor/factory speed density type tune but there may well be something out there.
The other obvious solution is that once we hit the limits of the stock system, any additional power would need to be added via means the computer doesn't know or care about/have any control over. Basically, through wet nitrous.
We'll get our hands on one soon enough. Hans seems to be just as excited as me about getting one of these... He's already trying to talk me into letting him drive it once in a while. Hahaha
The biggest single thing though would be trying to buy one that's already had both coil packs replaced, with new spark plugs. You'll want to see receipts or verify that the end of the part number on the coils is a later revision (I believe Q6 is the newest, original is Q1). That's easily $3,000 in parts plus a lot of labor. Changing plugs would get you familiar quickly with how these are put together, but there are lots of delicate things that can be easily broken in the process even if you are extremely careful...including the coil packs themselves (delicate wires inside that can be damaged if the coils are tweaked at all during removal/install...so changing plugs is risky business...fortunately they are gold-plated contact NGK Laser iridium plugs so it's like an every 100k thing). I purchased mine with original coils, but had done enough research in advance to know I needed to factor the replacement cost of those into the price of the car, so I ended up negotiating down almost $6,000 from the original asking price (which was too high anyway, so maybe only $4,000 off from where it should have been priced) based on that and other maintenance items. Also a good idea to make sure there are no fluid leaks or seepage anywhere, particularly ABC. Motor mounts are an engine out operation if they are the older design, and still a very labor-intensive repair even if they are the revision, so if you run into a vibratey one, take that into account. I believe most of the 05+ had the newer style mounts to start with but who knows. Other than those things, most of the normal maintenance/things to look for is pretty normal.





