W221 Crash test
That said, need to also consider what fraction of total safety is active, vs passive; how does one quantitate active safety.....esp steering, brakes, handling, stability controls, traction, various computer networked systems (e.g., AutoBrakeDrying, BrakeAssist, ALB, etc, etc) in various real-world scenarios....and consider decay curves....how do parameters like braking dists vary in a car w/5K mis, vs one w/12K mis and rear perf tires near-due for replacement???
And crash tests don't fully reflect many real-world scenarios in terms of passive safety.....esp scenarios like rollover (roof strength); high-speed rear impact (likely in any car w/much more powerful brakes than most cars on road); accurate differentiation of likely crash risks of death vs other, poss more gruesome outcomes like disabling head/spinal injuries, etc....
IMO, need to do own common-sense analysis of engineering tech of any car.....drive car in varying, challenging conditions to assess active safety capabilities....place own bets based upon partial data and much subjective judgment....and live w/consequences of one's bet in any "stress" scenario...which one may have predicted...or never even anticipated....
Neat video. Thanks for posting.



Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
http://6abc.com/news/1-injured-in-so...1/#videoplayer




