Those of you that own a w221.. Do you like the exterior better than the w222?



The new 2012 -on SL is simply aweful looking, few years already and still couldn't pick up the "feel".
The new CLS is never seen as fashion statement as the previous one
The rear of the new S no longer looks commanding. And by the time the new C comes out, it would look identical !!!
Ironically, the era of Mercedes design that gave you the best looking SL, CLS (and you can throw in the E while you're at it) also gave you the 220. All of those cars share a common design language. I'll grant you that the non AMG 220 looks both generic and geriatric, but the AMG kit and the right wheels cures that.
I've owned both the 220 and 221.I like the 221 a lot. Beautiful, aggressive body. In AMG trim it looks like a mechanical shark on the road. Not sure how it will age. It's a bold design and those tend to have a shorter lifespan.



S2000 for example. Good timeless design.
4Runner Limited, 96-02, before they changed it. That suv is 18 years old and still looks current.
Last edited by Jason B; May 27, 2014 at 06:57 PM.
The W221's wheels are chunky man jewelry. The 222's are delicate.
Everything about the 221's body suggests forward motion. The 222 invokes calm reflection.
They'd make a great couple, but I think I'll keep the one that looks like if you lifted up its tail you wouldn't find a vagina. And I'm afraid the AMG 222s are pretty much going to just be tough lesbians.
Mr. & Mrs. S Class: Imagine these two going at it in a dark room. Who do you think would be on top?
Last edited by Mike5215; May 28, 2014 at 10:16 PM.



The W221's wheels are chunky man jewelry. The 222's are delicate.
Everything about the 221's body suggests forward motion. The 222 invokes calm reflection.
They'd make a great couple, but I think I'll keep the one that looks like if you lifted up its tail you wouldn't find a vagina. And I'm afraid the AMG 222s are pretty much going to just be tough lesbians.
Mr. & Mrs. S Class: Imagine these two going at it in a dark room. Who do you think would be on top?


On the topic of feminine vs masculine design, the dashboard design of the 222 has essentially a big IPad instead of analog gauges. Guys want a direct, analog, real-time readout of the status of the car's running hardware wherever possible.
On the other hand, chicks love tablets. Unlike real computers, with keyboards and mice and actual useful software, tablets are non-threatening and simple to use. You can give a tablet to a three year old and he'll have no trouble running it. Instead of a gauge cluster in the 222, you have an animation of a gauge cluster. It's another reason why the hardcore 221 guys can't seem to get jazzed about the prospect of trading up at some point.
The car needs gender reassignment surgery.
Last edited by Mike5215; May 29, 2014 at 01:54 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
My BMW 3 series coupe body style just spoke to me the first time I ever saw it. That's why I got a 335 in 2008 and a M3 same body in 2012
The W221's wheels are chunky man jewelry. The 222's are delicate.
Everything about the 221's body suggests forward motion. The 222 invokes calm reflection.
They'd make a great couple, but I think I'll keep the one that looks like if you lifted up its tail you wouldn't find a vagina. And I'm afraid the AMG 222s are pretty much going to just be tough lesbians.
Mr. & Mrs. S Class: Imagine these two going at it in a dark room. Who do you think would be on top?

It's like comparing a thong to sweatpants. No contest.
One is spiking the ball while the other watches from the skybox.
S550 demographics would be interesting and I would fall on some outer edge. As I get closer to warranty run out, I will replace with a low mile well documented 2013. Not a '14 or newer.
However I remember people feeling the same way about 140 to 220 & 220 to 221.
However I remember people feeling the same way about 140 to 220 & 220 to 221.
I think we have to realize that were not Mercedes target demo for the S Class. I think we're mostly dudes who were in the market for a $50k car and discovered how much car you get with an S.
It's funny you mentioned the 140 vs 220 issue.The 140 guys felt the new 220 had gone off in some strange new direction they hadn't expected and didn't like. That's also a case of Mercedes replacing a masculine design with something softer, flowing and more feminine.
I think we have to realize that were not Mercedes target demo for the S Class. I think we're mostly dudes who were in the market for a $50k car and discovered how much car you get with an S.
It's funny you mentioned the 140 vs 220 issue.The 140 guys felt the new 220 had gone off in some strange new direction they hadn't expected and didn't like. That's also a case of Mercedes replacing a masculine design with something softer, flowing and more feminine.
As for the target market, I think for some time, the flagship vehicles of the top three German manufacturers (BMW - 7, AUDI - A8, MB - S) have been mainly targeted as, to be fair, what they are - limousines. However I think its right that the AMG spec be substantiantly different, because those vehicles are rarely (if ever) bought as limousines and bought primarily as a 'drivers' car. And (although personally a fan) its obvious that many people just want more from the current 222 AMG spec, whether that be the full AMG vehicle or just the AMG Line.
My friends, who are not car guys, will buy the 222 all day long. Reasons - perceived as best in class: safety, comfort, performance and brand name. Not to mention new and loaded with warranty.
The more I consider the body, its a designer's Crown Vic that hit the cutting room floor. I know, to harsh but I will ride a 221 for awhile.
Having said my peace, I am headed to the car wash and then tinker with my, yet to install, JBSpeed rear spoiler. And a beer. Cheers!
I'm just gonna go ahead and say this. I love the 221, but getting back inside after sitting in the 222 made the 221 feel like the inside of a Sonata by comparison. The 222 is so detailed, intricate and lavish it may be the nicest interior in any price range. Like if Mercedes found a way to install a vagina in that interior I'd be single. It's THAT kind of nice.
In black the AMG car looks suitably aggressive from the front:
Last edited by Mike5215; Jun 2, 2014 at 07:50 PM.

I want to go back and audition the stock Burmiester audio system. The good news about the 222 is that, at least in person, the non-AMG body to me looks a little better. The proportions in the nose aren't as exaggerated and it still looks reasonably aggressive. The non AMG stock 18" wheels are horrible but a set of 20's would fix that. Configuring the base car, with a Premium 1 package, standard leather, standard audio puts it at just over $102k.
Last edited by Mike5215; Jun 2, 2014 at 10:07 PM.
The interior of the 222 is mind blowing! I think in terms of quality, we have seen a return to the pre 140 days (I hope at least). I have had the opportunity to be around the 222 for a while and personally I love the look I think its brilliant.






