Off lease MB's
They buy the car from MB for $100,000 and over three years you pay back the depreciation ($43,000) in monthly installments plus interest.
Now they've been repaid their $43,000 and some minimal interest. But to close the deal and not get burned they need to sell the car for at least $57,000.
I get how the manufacturer can agree to do that because if they're wrong on residual value they can eat a little on the resale and it's all in house. They never really cared about making the nickle and dime interest on the lease interest...they want to move units.
But a bank isn't in the car business...they loan money in return for the principle and interest paid over time. The interest rate isn't great, 3% or 4%. Why would the bank risk the car being worth less than $57,000 at turn in? It could be 55,000 or 50,000. The slightest miscalculation on residual would wipe out the profit on the loan and could actually cost them money. MB isn't going to guarantee to a third party lender that they'll buy the car back for $57,000.
Has anyone in this thread (or on the forum) ever leased a Mercedes using a 3rd party bank? If so, how did they handle the residual situation?
Last edited by Mike5215; Mar 9, 2015 at 02:07 PM.
audi, bmw and mb financial are the three biggest players on the high line lease return markets with audi being the biggest by a long shot (unit-wise).
In 1996, I leased a Ford Expedition, and it was through some company that was definitely not Ford Motor Co. At the end of the term, the leasing company contacted me and scheduled a time to come to my house, inspect the truck, and pick it up. The residual was super high on that vehicle as it had just come out when we got it. The residual value was much higher than what the actual book value was at the end of the contract, so I assume that was just the leasing company's problem.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG









