Why One Should Not Buy A Tesla Model S
#376
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Southeastern USA
Posts: 2,581
Received 145 Likes
on
103 Posts
2010 E350 Luxury Sedan, Engine 272 (V6)
Where they going to sell other cars?
"Audi aims to have three electric models by 2020 and for electric vehicles to account for 25 to 30 percent of its sales by 2025, CEO Rupert Stadler told a German newspaper." Automotive News article
Where does Audi plan to sell the other 75% (ICE) of their production?
#377
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: FL & CT
Posts: 2,755
Received 796 Likes
on
752 Posts
2015 S550 Palladium/Deep Sea Blue, 2016 Tesla Model S 70D, 2015 Volvo XC70
Also acceptable to me would be a plugin hybrid with a semi-decent electric-only range, like 50+ miles.
#378
MBWorld Fanatic!
I suppose Audi can sell the 75% of the non EV cars they build in Asia, Africa, and Russia perhaps. Oh almost forgot China and even India are about to transition away from combustion cars too so you can count them out around 2030 as well. Increasingly combustion cars will be relegated to the cheapest and least sophisticated cars available to buy.
China is essentially being strangled to death by toxic emissions from combustion cars with smog like what we used to have in California in the 80s before they cleaned up the air with stringent limits on pollution. When China decides to do something it happens as everything is centrally controlled and they will be not far behind Europe in mandating EVs given the health issues they face with polluted air.
China is so interested in EVs that they recently offered Elon Musk something unprecedented. Perhaps you are aware that in order for a foreign company to setup a factory in China they require an equal partnership with a local Chinese company but China is apparently open to Tesla exempting tesla from this requirement.
When the Tesla Model 3 ships next year it will be the beginning of the end for premium combustion cars.
#380
MBWorld Fanatic!
Yup. After the iPhone "phone industries are still producing phones" alight...
And on the chart below you see what their business looks like. This is what will happen to combustion car manufacturers.
Within the next 3-5 years the premium car segment will come to be dominated by EVs and people will balk at buying a premium car that is not an EV.
Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/apple...try-now-2015-2
#381
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 10,126
Received 3,340 Likes
on
2,064 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
Yup. After the iPhone "phone industries are still producing phones" alight...
And on the chart below you see what their business looks like. This is what will happen to combustion car manufacturers.
Within the next 3-5 years the premium car segment will come to be dominated by EVs and people will balk at buying a premium car that is not an EV.
Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/apple...try-now-2015-2
No matter how promising certain tech is, when there are many competing interests and dependencies, things will take time.
A fitting comparison maybe cable and satellite companies (Comcast, Directv, etc.). It was assumed that net-based tech (streaming and on demand) will get rid of these outdated businesses years ago...
In this case, the tech was even there already unlike EV's.
Last I saw is that Comcast is alive and kicking
Last edited by Wolfman; 07-27-2016 at 08:39 PM.
#382
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: FL & CT
Posts: 2,755
Received 796 Likes
on
752 Posts
2015 S550 Palladium/Deep Sea Blue, 2016 Tesla Model S 70D, 2015 Volvo XC70
I agree with Wolfman that 3-5 years is way too aggressive. To me, "dominated" would mean 50+% market share. If Audi is saying 25-30% of its production will be EV within NINE years, I think the ICE legacy companies collectively would be lucky to get to 10-15% in 5 years. So unless you think Tesla and other premium EV startups are going to take 35%, I don't think the premium segment will be "dominated" by EVs quite so soon.
Last edited by syswei; 07-28-2016 at 08:11 AM.
#383
MBWorld Fanatic!
I agree with Wolfman that 3-5 years is way too aggressive. To me, "dominated" would mean 50+% market share. If Audi is saying 25-30% of its production will be EV within NINE years, I think the ICE legacy companies collectively would be lucky to get to 10-15% in 5 years. So unless you think Tesla and other premium EV startups are going to take 35%, I don't think the premium segment will be "dominated" by EVs quite so soon.
My thoughts on this matter stem from the fact that after the Model 3 was announced the market segment of Model 3 competitors have seen their sales in the US go down by 15% and that segment is already missing about $1.8BN in sales.
So let me revise my prediction to say that within 3-5 years EVs will begin to dominate the premium car segment not worldwide but that it will happen country by country and it will begin with certain countries first. Certainly countries like Norway are not that far from EVs dominating new car sales.
Also keep in mind that the Tesla Model S was released in 2012 and in 3 years the Model S became the market leader in the segment the S Class competed in and since then Model S sales have been increasing while pretty much every other competing model has been steadily losing sales.
Here's another perspective on how quickly EVs will go mainstream and begin to dominate the higher end automotive segment and then work its way down from there. The chart below shows the amount of preorders Tesla received in just ONE WEEK since the Model 3 was announced and how it compares to mass selling cars in the United States. Notice how Tesla received about as many pre orders for the Model 3 as the annual Toyota Camry sales in the United States.
When the Tesla Giga Factory 1 ramps up to full production with the ability to produce ~ 500,000 vehicles and additional Gigafactories are built it will affect the sales of the most profitable models of premium carmakers. This is a matter of profit as it is a matter of units sold. Tesla is still maintaining a profit margin of about 25% per car. The highest in the industry because EVs are substantially less complicated to build.
Last edited by WEBSRFR; 07-28-2016 at 11:12 AM. Reason: Fix typo
#384
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Southeastern USA
Posts: 2,581
Received 145 Likes
on
103 Posts
2010 E350 Luxury Sedan, Engine 272 (V6)
Huh?
Fair point and I understand where you and Wolfman are coming from. I agree with what you both are saying.
My thoughts on this matter stem from the fact that after the Model 3 was announced the market segment of Model 3 competitors have seen their sales in the US go down by 15% and that segment is already missing about $1.8BN in sales.
So let me revise my prediction to say that within 3-5 years EVs will begin to dominate the premium car segment not worldwide but that it will happen country by country and it will begin with certain countries first. Certainly countries like Norway are not that far from EVs dominating new car sales.
Also keep in mind that the Tesla Model S was released in 2012 and in 3 years the Model S became the market leader in the segment the S Class competed in and since then Model S sales have been increasing while pretty much every other competing model has been steadily losing sales.
Here's another perspective on how quickly EVs will go mainstream and begin to dominate the higher end automotive segment and then work its way down from there. The chart below shows the amount of preorders Tesla received in just ONE WEEK since the Model 3 was announced and how it compares to mass selling cars in the United States. Notice how Tesla received about as many pre orders for the Model 3 as the annual Toyota Camry sales in the United States.
When the Tesla Giga Factory 1 ramps up to full production with the ability to produce ~ 500,000 vehicles and additional Gigafactories are built it will affect the sales of the most profitable models of premium carmakers. This is a matter of profit as it is a matter of units sold. Tesla is still maintaining a profit margin of about 25% per car. The highest in the industry because EVs are substantially less complicated to build.
My thoughts on this matter stem from the fact that after the Model 3 was announced the market segment of Model 3 competitors have seen their sales in the US go down by 15% and that segment is already missing about $1.8BN in sales.
So let me revise my prediction to say that within 3-5 years EVs will begin to dominate the premium car segment not worldwide but that it will happen country by country and it will begin with certain countries first. Certainly countries like Norway are not that far from EVs dominating new car sales.
Also keep in mind that the Tesla Model S was released in 2012 and in 3 years the Model S became the market leader in the segment the S Class competed in and since then Model S sales have been increasing while pretty much every other competing model has been steadily losing sales.
Here's another perspective on how quickly EVs will go mainstream and begin to dominate the higher end automotive segment and then work its way down from there. The chart below shows the amount of preorders Tesla received in just ONE WEEK since the Model 3 was announced and how it compares to mass selling cars in the United States. Notice how Tesla received about as many pre orders for the Model 3 as the annual Toyota Camry sales in the United States.
When the Tesla Giga Factory 1 ramps up to full production with the ability to produce ~ 500,000 vehicles and additional Gigafactories are built it will affect the sales of the most profitable models of premium carmakers. This is a matter of profit as it is a matter of units sold. Tesla is still maintaining a profit margin of about 25% per car. The highest in the industry because EVs are substantially less complicated to build.
As for the above, you still don't have a clue. Now you are implying that Model 3 will sell almost as many cars as Toyta Camry?
How can Tesla have a 25% profit margin and lost money all four past quarters?
You still have never cited any references which show that the "announcement of the Model 3" resulted in decreased sales for premium cars in America. It just ain't so.
Your knowledge of the automobile industry and economics is sorely lacking a base in reality.
#385
Lots of topics going on here. Back to Autopilot. I now have 10,000+ km using it. Thanks to over-the-air updates, it continues to get better and better. I still like to intervene when, for example, I get cut off or there's something strange in/on the road, but I've actually read the manual and stay vigilant. The YouTube videos showing people sleeping or otherwise not paying attention are made by idiots.
I will say, Autopilot is amazing as is. Compare it to what the MB company has cobbled together: http://www.thedrive.com/tech/4591/th...-tesla-model-s You should at least take a test drive and check Autopilot out.
I will say, Autopilot is amazing as is. Compare it to what the MB company has cobbled together: http://www.thedrive.com/tech/4591/th...-tesla-model-s You should at least take a test drive and check Autopilot out.
The following users liked this post:
WEBSRFR (07-28-2016)
#386
The 25% profit margin on Model S, and possibly X as well, is true. The balance sheet issue is due to the buildout of infrastructure (think Amazon.com). Tesla is ramping up for the upcoming Model 3; the company is a major customer of some of the most incredible robotics on the planet. You want profits? Patience, grasshopper.
#388
MBWorld Fanatic!
- On a per unit basis, Tesla cars are the most profitable in the auto industry. Their profit margin per unit is around 25%. With battery kWh cost dropping to around $100 they expect to maintain the current profit margin. At that point it would cost less to produce an EV than a combustion car (hence the start of the end for premium combustion cars).
- The reason they have yet to make a profit is because whatever profit they make, they are investing it all on future growth (as they very well should).
- Tesla is in the process of ramping up production from 50,000 vehicles a year to 500,000 vehicles a year and this will incur immense capital expenditures.
- And before anyone posts how such a ramp up is impossible, understand that Henry Ford accomplished such a ramp up with early 1900-era technology. Tesla just has to track the Ford Model T ramp up, which they are.
- If you still don't get it, study how Amazon ended up being what they are.
- Both Amazon and Tesla has something in common: Rather than chase short term quarterly results for children with ADD they are instead building companies with massive growth for adults with patience for far greater rewards in the long-term.
Elon laid out his this plan for Tesla 10 years ago and interesting enough even merging solar power with the core Tesla business was environed 10 years ago.
https://www.tesla.com/blog/secret-te...een-you-and-me
#389
MBWorld Fanatic!
If you feel these numbers are not accurate present your own facts and source. Saying "It just ain't so" does not change the facts.
The real test will come next year. Let's see how many people still buy an A4, C Class, or 3 series when for the same money they can buy a Tesla Model 3.
#390
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: FL & CT
Posts: 2,755
Received 796 Likes
on
752 Posts
2015 S550 Palladium/Deep Sea Blue, 2016 Tesla Model S 70D, 2015 Volvo XC70
Seriously, what part of this data chart do you not understand? Look at how the entry level the premium car segment in the US is pretty much across the board missing sales from last year since the Tesla Model 3 was announced.
If you feel these numbers are not accurate present your own facts and source. Saying "It just ain't so" does not change the facts.
The real test will come next year. Let's see how many people still buy an A4, C Class, or 3 series when for the same money they can buy a Tesla Model 3.
If you feel these numbers are not accurate present your own facts and source. Saying "It just ain't so" does not change the facts.
The real test will come next year. Let's see how many people still buy an A4, C Class, or 3 series when for the same money they can buy a Tesla Model 3.
#391
MBWorld Fanatic!
Oh and the June numbers are now in and it shows the entry level premium car market now missing over $2B in sales YTD. The sales are down across the board for just about every car the upcoming Tesla Model 3 will compete with. Just about all the Tesla Model 3 competition is showing double digit % decline in sales from last year.
Last edited by WEBSRFR; 07-28-2016 at 04:03 PM. Reason: Typo.
#392
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 10,126
Received 3,340 Likes
on
2,064 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
Pre-orders are typically fully committed orders that ship when the product becomes available. These here are simple reservation slots for fully refundable $1000.
Some will want to see if they can make money by selling an early build (or the slot), but most will make a decision to buy the car when they actually get notified to start configuring it.
My assumption is that people will look at what else is out there at the time, take in actual drive reviews, check on trade-in options (or lack there-of), financing and then decide to pull the trigger.
Over the years that number may increase but could also easily be cut in half.
Point is that this number can't really be used for any statistical comparison.
Last edited by Wolfman; 07-28-2016 at 05:19 PM.
#393
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: FL & CT
Posts: 2,755
Received 796 Likes
on
752 Posts
2015 S550 Palladium/Deep Sea Blue, 2016 Tesla Model S 70D, 2015 Volvo XC70
hmmm...maybe Tesla isn't the only auto company prone to exaggerating its semi-autonomous driving claims...
Mercedes pulls ad challenged by safety groups (Automotive News)
Mercedes pulls ad challenged by safety groups (Automotive News)
#394
MBWorld Fanatic!
hmmm...maybe Tesla isn't the only auto company prone to exaggerating its semi-autonomous driving claims...
Mercedes pulls ad challenged by safety groups (Automotive News)
Mercedes pulls ad challenged by safety groups (Automotive News)
The Drive’s Alex Roy recently did a comparison of both systems. He wrote that Mercedes’ Drive Pilot is dangerous in most conditions and that he doesn’t even “understand how Mercedes-Benz could release this to the public.” Worse yet Mercedes does not update the software in their cars so you are stuck with the implementation the car is shipped with. He said of Tesla’s Autopilot that it is “definitely safer than a human driver alone, assuming you use it as intended.” And Tesla updates and improves the software several times each year.
http://www.thedrive.com/tech/4591/th...alflow_twitter
Last edited by WEBSRFR; 07-29-2016 at 10:22 AM. Reason: Tidy up grammar.
#395
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 10,126
Received 3,340 Likes
on
2,064 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
hmmm...maybe Tesla isn't the only auto company prone to exaggerating its semi-autonomous driving claims...
Mercedes pulls ad challenged by safety groups (Automotive News)
Mercedes pulls ad challenged by safety groups (Automotive News)
Tesla marketing is misleading as well of course, starting with the name "Auto-Pilot" which refers to other autonomous systems (planes).
That said, neither Tesla's or MB's system is anywhere close to be used for autonomous or even semi-autonomous driving and can be best described as assistive.
Whoever relies on either one of these, risks their lives and the lives of others.
#396
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 10,126
Received 3,340 Likes
on
2,064 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
Except Tesla did not exaggerate the capabilities of Autopilot. They never called it a "self driving car" as Mercedes did with their advertisements. Tesla sells all cars with Autopilot turned off and there is a deliberate process to activate the technology and it is quite clear during that process how the technology is supposed to be used and that is to be used as a driving aid with a driver paying attention.
The Drive’s Alex Roy recently did a comparison of both systems. He wrote that Mercedes’ Drive Pilot is dangerous in most conditions and that he doesn’t even “understand how Mercedes-Benz could release this to the public.” Worse yet Mercedes does not update the software in their cars so you are stuck with the implementation the car is shipped with. He said of Tesla’s Autopilot that it is “definitely safer than a human driver alone, assuming you use it as intended.” And Tesla updates and improves the software several times each year.
http://www.thedrive.com/tech/4591/th...alflow_twitter
The Drive’s Alex Roy recently did a comparison of both systems. He wrote that Mercedes’ Drive Pilot is dangerous in most conditions and that he doesn’t even “understand how Mercedes-Benz could release this to the public.” Worse yet Mercedes does not update the software in their cars so you are stuck with the implementation the car is shipped with. He said of Tesla’s Autopilot that it is “definitely safer than a human driver alone, assuming you use it as intended.” And Tesla updates and improves the software several times each year.
http://www.thedrive.com/tech/4591/th...alflow_twitter
Stop pitching Tesla. Just better than bad is still bad when it comes to safety.
#397
MBWorld Fanatic!
As someone who uses Autopilot every day I disagree. The current Autopilot system has gone through several significant iterations with software updates and we are now expecting version 8.0. The system is absolutely ready and it is already statistically safer when used as directed when compared to a human driving a car without Autopilot.
Realize Autopilot will soon approach 200 MILLION miles of driving. There was one known fatality in just over 130 million miles where Tesla Autopilot was in use. Among all vehicles in the US, there is a fatality every 94 million miles. Worldwide, there is a fatality approximately every 60 million miles. So already the Tesla Autopilot system is about 50% better than a human at avoiding accidents. It will only get significantly better.
While a driver paying attention + Tesla Autopilot makes that diver safer, the latest Mercedes DrivePilot seems to be useless for practical use based on every review I had read of the technology. By Comparison, I can drive dozens of miles with Tesla Autopilot with very little input from me. Rather than just me being vigilant on my own I am better off with me being vigilant along with the Tesla ultrasonics, radar, the camera, and Autopilot software keeping an eye on everything.
Tesla Autopilot has completely changed the way we think about long distance driving.
Here's an example of Tesla Autopilot actively intervening to swerve and avoid an accident. It's these kind of accidents that are tough for humans to react to when hours of monotonous driving are involved and reaction times to unexpected situations diminish. At the same time the Tesla ultrasonics and Autopilot software is always at max vigilance every fraction of a second. The driver of the car below would have been in an accident if not for Autopilot. He never used any steering or pedal input to avoid this accident. It was all Autopilot.
Last edited by WEBSRFR; 07-29-2016 at 04:09 PM. Reason: Fix grammar.
#398
MBWorld Fanatic!
It is not what you think it is.
Autopilot always requires a pilot to pay attention to the flying of the airplane. It will happily fly into a tornado, a mountain, or another plane if the pilot is not paying attention.
When a Tesla owner activates Autopilot there is an activation sequences that spells out in detail that it is to be used as a driving aid and that it is essentially lane keeping assist and traffic aware cruise control. It just happens to do those functions better than any other car manufacturer by a very large margin.
#399
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kenilworth, il usa
Posts: 2,928
Received 382 Likes
on
246 Posts
'22 Alpina B7,'21 G63 Renntech obviously (wife), Wrangler(kids)
Please take the time to look up and understand what Autopilot is as it refers to the technology used in the aviation industry.
It is not what you think it is.
Autopilot always requires a pilot to pay attention to the flying of the airplane. It will happily fly into a tornado, a mountain, or another plane if the pilot is not paying attention.
When a Tesla owner activates Autopilot there is an activation sequences that spells out in detail that it is to be used as a driving aid and that it is essentially lane keeping assist and traffic aware cruise control. It just happens to do those functions better than any other car manufacturer by a very large margin.
It is not what you think it is.
Autopilot always requires a pilot to pay attention to the flying of the airplane. It will happily fly into a tornado, a mountain, or another plane if the pilot is not paying attention.
When a Tesla owner activates Autopilot there is an activation sequences that spells out in detail that it is to be used as a driving aid and that it is essentially lane keeping assist and traffic aware cruise control. It just happens to do those functions better than any other car manufacturer by a very large margin.
The research, sources and info prep must require a full staff of workers.
The following users liked this post:
MTrauman (07-30-2016)