SERENITY NOW!!!
I posted another thread saying how much better the new car with RFT rode, compared to my 2015 with the original RFT. Well, I’m sure the RFT technology has improved, but the difference in ride quality of the new car is noticeably better with the conventional tires and, as with the 2015, the tire noise factor is DAY AND NIGHT better. My overall conclusion is that the FL 2018 model has a more refined tuning of the Magic Body Control suspension and that when some wonderful conventional tires are fitted, the results are truly amazing.
I know that most most members here just stick with the RFT and I can’t blame you, as it is a pain carrying around the spare I keep in the trunk. But, if silence is golden to you and ride quality is everything, I strongly recommend dumping the run flats and putting a set of these amazing Bridgestones on. You’ll then experience the wonderful feeling of SERENITY NOW!

The reason I am asking is because my order has the same R17 wheels, as opposed to the 11R default. And the DOG indicates the 11R gets 245/45R19 (front) and 275/40R19 (rear), which are not only wider, but also have a thicker sidewall. I was wondering whether this makes a fundamental difference in handling, comfort etc.
BTW, R17 is a no-cost option in the US, but it is 1000+ euro option in Germany (or elsewhere in Europe for that matter). The defaults are still the same 11R though. For this reason alone, I still somewhat feel OK with my choice, but cannot stop wondering about the above.
Anything you will tell me will ease my mind. And thanks in advance for that.
11R: 19" Multispoke Wheels
R17: 19" Twin-5-Spoke Wheels
Last edited by salamigs; Mar 5, 2018 at 11:37 PM.
So the ones in the pic must be non-staggered 245/50R18 then? At least that is what the DOG has...




The reason I am asking is because my order has the same R17 wheels, as opposed to the 11R default. And the DOG indicates the 11R gets 245/45R19 (front) and 275/40R19 (rear), which are not only wider, but also have a thicker sidewall. I was wondering whether this makes a fundamental difference in handling, comfort etc.
BTW, R17 is a no-cost option in the US, but it is 1000+ euro option in Germany (or elsewhere in Europe for that matter). The defaults are still the same 11R though. For this reason alone, I still somewhat feel OK with my choice, but cannot stop wondering about the above.
Anything you will tell me will ease my mind. And thanks in advance for that.
11R: 19" Multispoke Wheels
R17: 19" Twin-5-Spoke Wheels
Several years ago, I was driving home from L.A. to OC on the 405 freeway. It was about 6pm, but dark out. The traffic was heavy, but moving fast. I was in my Lexus LS400 driving in the fast lane when I hit an object. I didn’t see it, so could not avoid it. My left front tire, which was a fairly new Michelin, shredded. I somehow managed to get to the right shoulder and I phoned AAA. Before AAA got there, a Metro tow truck pulled up behind me with his light bar blazing. The driver opened my trunk, removed my full size, matching spare (thank YOU Lexus!), changed the wheel and I was home for dinner. If I had not had a spare, I would have been in for a ride in the tow truck, taking my car to who knows where, and would have had to deal with either taxis or a rental car, etc. I would not have made dinner, would have been very inconvenienced and thoroughly pissed off.
Having a spare—preferably a full size, matching spare, under the trunk floor, is a common sense safety measure. Take my story told above, put your wife and kids in the car and change the location from L.A. to Yellowstone for a family vacation. I don’t plan on changing a tire myself at the side of the road, I’ll wait for the tow truck. But DAMN! Let me have a frigging spare for him to change. RFT are one subject. Having a spare is related, but a whole different matter. Truly, the idiot at MB who decided that losing the spare was a good idea, IMHO, ought to be publicly flogged!
Trending Topics



the difference in ride quality of the new car is noticeably better with the conventional tires and, as with the 2015, the tire noise factor is DAY AND NIGHT better. My overall conclusion is that the FL 2018 model has a more refined tuning of the Magic Body Control suspension and that when some wonderful conventional tires are fitted, the results are truly amazing.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG












If you mean that offering fewer choices in the G90 is a positive for buyers, there is one positive but overall for me less choice is very negative. The only positive imo is that less choice = lower costs and MSRP. But I'd rather have more choice, not less. The ONE wheel design they offer in ONE size for the G90 just may not be every buyer's cup of tea. Even in the W222, I wish there were more choice...I rate the best of the exterior and interior color choices and also wheel choices for me personally only a B+ or A- or so.
Anyway, good to see you're satisfied with your ride quality and ride quality , comfort , noise is all what these are all about
Happy Driving
If you mean that offering fewer choices in the G90 is a positive for buyers, there is one positive but overall for me less choice is very negative. The only positive imo is that less choice = lower costs and MSRP. But I'd rather have more choice, not less. The ONE wheel design they offer in ONE size for the G90 just may not be every buyer's cup of tea. Even in the W222, I wish there were more choice...I rate the best of the exterior and interior color choices and also wheel choices for me personally only a B+ or A- or so.
Personally, I like the Genesis approach. KISS (keep it simple stupid) (not directed at you) principles are ones I subscribe to!




Personally, I like the Genesis approach. KISS (keep it simple stupid) (not directed at you) principles are ones I subscribe to!
Again, agree to disagree on this one!





