Is too much commonality ruining the S Class?
I took my S in for its B Service a few months back and got a new E Class as a loaner. The car was obviously smaller than an S, but so many things about the car were just not S Class - class. The sound system for one was no where near as good as the 3D system in the 580. I had the high end system in E63, and while the sub in the trunk was amazing for low end bass, the 3D system in my 580 is almost as good. Almost. But the ride quality is the S shines over the E. When I picked up my S after service, I realized just how much I missed it.
I like my S580. Now that the issues have been fixed, I like my new car - a lot. I wash my own car. When i'm finished washing it, I often sit back and admire just how good looking the car is. And thankfully, at least in Atlanta, you don't see four of them at every stoplight, like you do some cars (Teslas for example).
Just my 2 cents.
Last edited by Mem30306; Jul 31, 2024 at 08:03 AM.





If the government is made of “we the people”, our neighbors, and “people just like us”, we are actually the ones driving the change through our choices. Does the choice to water down Amg or an s class come from my state representative or the shareholder and corporate choices due to shareholder demands for profit.
While these cars have always been small medium and large, they didn’t really share platforms or tech features in the same time and space. Features bled down over many years from an sclass to a cclass. Today we have most of these features available in all sizes, especially when considering different brands. Ultimately without differentiation, Mercedes will continue this downward slope.

If the government is made of “we the people”, our neighbors, and “people just like us”, we are actually the ones driving the change through our choices. Does the choice to water down Amg or an s class come from my state representative or the shareholder and corporate choices due to shareholder demands for profit.
While these cars have always been small medium and large, they didn’t really share platforms or tech features in the same time and space. Features bled down over many years from an sclass to a cclass. Today we have most of these features available in all sizes, especially when considering different brands. Ultimately without differentiation, Mercedes will continue this downward slope.
We have always fought for equality. But now we are also talking much more rightly about equity, understanding that we must be clear-eyed about the fact that, yes, we want everyone to get an equal amount — that sounds right — but not everyone starts out from the same place. Some people start out on first base. Some people start out on third base. And if the goal is truly about equality, it has to be about a goal of saying everybody should end up in the same place. And since we didn’t start in the same place, some folks might need more equitable distribution.




We have always fought for equality. But now we are also talking much more rightly about equity, understanding that we must be clear-eyed about the fact that, yes, we want everyone to get an equal amount — that sounds right — but not everyone starts out from the same place. Some people start out on first base. Some people start out on third base. And if the goal is truly about equality, it has to be about a goal of saying everybody should end up in the same place. And since we didn’t start in the same place, some folks might need more equitable distribution.
As someone that started with that zero other than being a child with initiative, and still HAVE TO work hard every day to earn every dollar, I would aspire to achieve an sclass that differentiates itself from the competition and not have it be for the commoner that is looking for someone else to help them achieve it. “Class” is part of the Mercedes tiered naming moniker, and a reality of societies and that people are not equal and can not afford the same things.
As someone that started with that zero other than being a child with initiative, and still HAVE TO work hard every day to earn every dollar, I would aspire to achieve an sclass that differentiates itself from the competition and not have it be for the commoner that is looking for someone else to help them achieve it. “Class” is part of the Mercedes tiered naming moniker, and a reality of societies and that people are not equal and can not afford the same things.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




and yes, I understand many C class shoppers are not S class shoppers, but on the other hand, many successful people that own cheap Toyotas are more than able to buy an S class in cash. They may need that visual peacock or better differentiated tech to pull them to a brand.
I am actually so shocked by the comfort of my old s55 that I’ve considered selling my 13 63 wagon and my s55 (cars owned) to get into a newer sclass. I just love my wagon so much and it’s so rare that I can’t make a choice. The 55 only has 62k so I’ll hopefully drive it for a long time and be financially responsible…put the money into a fourth toy, lol
With how the W223 facelift is turning out, I am getting flashbacks to the W140 era, which saw the S-Klasse delayed from the fall of 1989 to the spring of 1991, at which point it had gone massively over budget. Like the W220, it was also a clean-sheet redesign (the first for the S-Klasse, since the W126 had used the W116 architecture), but failed for the exact opposite reason of the W220: it was not up with the time, was very brutally fashioned (Sacco’s hands were partially tied by the engineering team, and the failure would lead to his influence waning), and was priced much higher to “exceed” the 7er and LS. Which is not what the market was looking for at all in the early to mid 1990s. Perhaps most crucially, it was missing the quintessential S-Klasse elegance, at least in terms of styling and visuals, and was a bit of a shock to people accustomed to the W116/W126, who may have preferred the much more attractively styled 7er or LS cars. In short, the W140 failed because it was driven almost exclusively by engineers who could not read the market.
The W220, the “Smaller and Friendlier” S-Klasse (called by some as the best 7er Mercedes-Benz ever produced) failed because it was far too driven by trying appease the market with a 2000s car built with 1990s tech. In retrospect, I can definitely see why the W220 was more appealing upon arrival, but unfortunately lost its luster due to the McKinsey and Kinsey Bean-Counting inertia.
W221 ended up being the “Goldilocks S-Klasse” with a very nice blend of increased quality, modern engineering, a design that was very appealing to people in the F-Segment and the right amount of the S-Klasse elegance. The W222 was helped by essentially just being a continuation of the W221, stylistically and architecturally. Whatever happens with the W223 facelift, I assure you it will be big news: Mercedes-Benz has put far too much time and money into it to for it to be anything other than a big success addressing all of its major issues or a failure that will kill the W223 within a couple of years (no in-between).
We are both retired from one of the largest, well known, old corporations in US and they wouldn't have an "S class fleet " just my curiosity !
Last edited by Mem30306; Jul 31, 2024 at 01:57 PM.
It's been a long time since we have traveled to any "expensive" cities, other than visits to England and Scotland, where we always stayed in top-level hotels...I don't recall any of them having house vehicles of any ilk.








If they have an S class fleet and they're paying for you to stay in MO, or Four Seasons you should not have a problem telling us the name of it adevarat Dima ?
If they have an S class fleet and they're paying for you to stay in MO, or Four Seasons you should not have a problem telling us the name of it adevarat Dima ?[/QUOTE
company of 'smartest men the the room'









