Improviz
11-27-2006, 02:29 PM
#29
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS55 AMG
If you've got actual recorded data from that date from an official source, let's see it. Mine is NWS data for Phoenix.Haven't seen a video of the two running yet. Have you?
Haven't seen a timeslip of a Lambo, including yours, running an altitude-corrected 11.6 (or, as you would round it, an 11.5
). Have you?Haven't seen a video of any stock Lambo pulling any stock S65 or SL65. Have you?
At the track, another C6 Z06 could only run 116mph, putting it also in line with the C6 I raced. So far Ive done a total of 3 runs in my car, and each has gotten substantialy faster. Owners of modified Renntech Benz's who have seen my car, raced it, raced other cars such as an Sl65 have a agreed, my car will pull an Sl65 let alone a S65.
The problem is this: you have provided the raw numbers. They fall short.
Come back when you've got something to show. But your time and trap don't correct to any 11.59 @122.61, no matter how you slice it.
Time and time and time again whenever you get shown to be wrong, you simply trot out the same old "I could do this" type arguments, "my friend says I can do this", and the good ol' fashioned ad hominem red herring nonsense.
Why not trot out some numbers of you beating an 11.56 @ 122?? Oh, I know why: because you don't have them!
11-27-2006, 08:38 PM
#31
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How exactly does one get OWNED by a guy with a 2001 Mercedes, and another guy who compares cars to driving in his mommys mercedes?
I will get video racing an Sl65, as I will get more video racing the Z06. As a matter of fact the Z06 gets the jump as he does the 3 horn beeps, as Im driving and filming at the same time.
Autoweek just got 114mph out of the new 997TT, I guess an Sl65 will kill one of those too!
I will get video racing an Sl65, as I will get more video racing the Z06. As a matter of fact the Z06 gets the jump as he does the 3 horn beeps, as Im driving and filming at the same time.
Autoweek just got 114mph out of the new 997TT, I guess an Sl65 will kill one of those too!
11-27-2006, 09:28 PM
#33
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 10,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How exactly does one get OWNED by a guy with a 2001 Mercedes, and another guy who compares cars to driving in his mommys mercedes?
I will get video racing an Sl65, as I will get more video racing the Z06. As a matter of fact the Z06 gets the jump as he does the 3 horn beeps, as Im driving and filming at the same time.
Autoweek just got 114mph out of the new 997TT, I guess an Sl65 will kill one of those too!
I will get video racing an Sl65, as I will get more video racing the Z06. As a matter of fact the Z06 gets the jump as he does the 3 horn beeps, as Im driving and filming at the same time.
Autoweek just got 114mph out of the new 997TT, I guess an Sl65 will kill one of those too!
ummm I'm sensing some self-esteem issues here. Some of the most knowledgeable people I know have almost nothing. If you are proven wrong then you are wrong and if not then you are right. #'s don't tell the whole story so posting times from different mags isn't going to help either case!!!!
What you need are two arbitrary drivers one in an S65 and the other in the lambo who know how to drive. As for the SL 65 being faster then the p-car sure esp. if the driver mis-shifts!
Further more this is a car enthusiast forum, not the I have a bigger d**k forum!
So grow up!
Last edited by harpz; 11-27-2006 at 09:30 PM.
11-27-2006, 09:31 PM
#34
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 10,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
11-27-2006, 11:24 PM
#35
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS55 AMG
How's that?
Oh, and again, you make yourself look like an insecure, petulant little child by going into idiotic rants about the car I drive, as if somehow, this precludes my being able to look at two timeslips and determine which car was faster.
Do you think anyone is looking at claptrap like that and saying "Yeah, that's right: Improviz cannot possibly examine two timeslips and determine which car is faster, because he drives a CLK55". Truly sad, and truly weak.
The only person feeding at that little literary trough is you.I mean, you are like the weeble of debates; no matter how many times I knock you down and show you're flat-out wrong, you keep popping right back up with yet another "hey, don't look at *those* facts; look at *this*! Look at the car improviz drives! Look at the clothes he wears! Look at his haircut! Look at anything, please, anything, please guys, I'm desperate here, look at anything but the facts!" rant.
I posted car magazine tests, all of which showed the SL65, S65, and CL65 to be faster to the 1/4 mile, than any Gallardo test out there.
Your response: to attack the magazines and the car I drive.
And so on, and so on, and so on.
Pretty soon you'll be attacking yourself for that timeslip: "Well, that allenlambo guy just can't drive! Oh, ****...that's ME! Um...err...ah...dammit...crap, allen, think, dammit, THINK...ah, yeah: IMPROVIZ DRIVES A CLK55! DON'T LISTEN TO HIM, EVEN WHEN HE'S USING MY OWN TIMELSIP!!"
Absolutely, totally pathetic. And what's the saddest thing here is that your monumental ego won't even allow you to see how much of a laugh people are having watching you get dismantled, piece by shallow, petty, nouveau riche piece.
http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dl...FREE/406210702
0-60: 4.57 seconds
0-100 km/h (62.1 mph): 5.07 sec
0-quarter-mile: 13.03 sec @ 110.9 mph
Last edited by Improviz; 11-28-2006 at 12:17 AM.
11-28-2006, 12:52 AM
#36
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh, I'd say that you got OWNED by repeatedly being shown to be wrong, stupid, and ignorant.
How's that?
Oh, and again, you make yourself look like an insecure, petulant little child by going into idiotic rants about the car I drive, as if somehow, this precludes my being able to look at two timeslips and determine which car was faster.
Do you think anyone is looking at claptrap like that and saying "Yeah, that's right: Improviz cannot possibly examine two timeslips and determine which car is faster, because he drives a CLK55". Truly sad, and truly weak. The only person feeding at that little literary trough is you.
You just don't get it, do you? The game's over. You lost. You posted a time. The S65 beat your best run, in both ET and in trap, by 0.5 seconds and 5 mph respectively. You're slower. End of story. The numbers tell the tale.
I mean, you are like the weeble of debates; no matter how many times I knock you down and show you're flat-out wrong, you keep popping right back up with yet another "hey, don't look at *those* facts; look at *this*! Look at the car improviz drives! Look at the clothes he wears! Look at his haircut! Look at anything, please, anything, please guys, I'm desperate here, look at anything but the facts!" rant.
I posted car magazine tests, all of which showed the SL65, S65, and CL65 to be faster to the 1/4 mile, than any Gallardo test out there.
Your response: to attack the magazines and the car I drive.
And so on, and so on, and so on.
Pretty soon you'll be attacking yourself for that timeslip: "Well, that allenlambo guy just can't drive! Oh, ****...that's ME! Um...err...ah...dammit...crap, allen, think, dammit, THINK...ah, yeah: IMPROVIZ DRIVES A CLK55! DON'T LISTEN TO HIM, EVEN WHEN HE'S USING MY OWN TIMELSIP!!"
Absolutely, totally pathetic. And what's the saddest thing here is that your monumental ego won't even allow you to see how much of a laugh people are having watching you get dismantled, piece by shallow, petty, nouveau riche piece.
Guess what they got in the Gallardo, allen? 110 mph.
http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dl...FREE/406210702
0-60: 4.57 seconds
0-100 km/h (62.1 mph): 5.07 sec
0-quarter-mile: 13.03 sec @ 110.9 mph
How's that?
Oh, and again, you make yourself look like an insecure, petulant little child by going into idiotic rants about the car I drive, as if somehow, this precludes my being able to look at two timeslips and determine which car was faster.
Do you think anyone is looking at claptrap like that and saying "Yeah, that's right: Improviz cannot possibly examine two timeslips and determine which car is faster, because he drives a CLK55". Truly sad, and truly weak.
The only person feeding at that little literary trough is you.You just don't get it, do you? The game's over. You lost. You posted a time. The S65 beat your best run, in both ET and in trap, by 0.5 seconds and 5 mph respectively. You're slower. End of story. The numbers tell the tale.
I mean, you are like the weeble of debates; no matter how many times I knock you down and show you're flat-out wrong, you keep popping right back up with yet another "hey, don't look at *those* facts; look at *this*! Look at the car improviz drives! Look at the clothes he wears! Look at his haircut! Look at anything, please, anything, please guys, I'm desperate here, look at anything but the facts!" rant.
I posted car magazine tests, all of which showed the SL65, S65, and CL65 to be faster to the 1/4 mile, than any Gallardo test out there.
Your response: to attack the magazines and the car I drive.
And so on, and so on, and so on.
Pretty soon you'll be attacking yourself for that timeslip: "Well, that allenlambo guy just can't drive! Oh, ****...that's ME! Um...err...ah...dammit...crap, allen, think, dammit, THINK...ah, yeah: IMPROVIZ DRIVES A CLK55! DON'T LISTEN TO HIM, EVEN WHEN HE'S USING MY OWN TIMELSIP!!"
Absolutely, totally pathetic. And what's the saddest thing here is that your monumental ego won't even allow you to see how much of a laugh people are having watching you get dismantled, piece by shallow, petty, nouveau riche piece.
Guess what they got in the Gallardo, allen? 110 mph.
http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dl...FREE/406210702
0-60: 4.57 seconds
0-100 km/h (62.1 mph): 5.07 sec
0-quarter-mile: 13.03 sec @ 110.9 mph
11-28-2006, 01:48 AM
#37
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: mymbonline
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mymbonline
How exactly does one get OWNED by a guy with a 2001 Mercedes, and another guy who compares cars to driving in his mommys mercedes?
I will get video racing an Sl65, as I will get more video racing the Z06. As a matter of fact the Z06 gets the jump as he does the 3 horn beeps, as Im driving and filming at the same time.
Autoweek just got 114mph out of the new 997TT, I guess an Sl65 will kill one of those too!
I will get video racing an Sl65, as I will get more video racing the Z06. As a matter of fact the Z06 gets the jump as he does the 3 horn beeps, as Im driving and filming at the same time.
Autoweek just got 114mph out of the new 997TT, I guess an Sl65 will kill one of those too!
or that ill tear you a new ******* in my 997s through any canyon in la
get the videos and then you can talk, before you get your words dont mean ****
a 65 will smoke a 997tt in the long run
11-28-2006, 02:35 AM
#38
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OC, SoCal
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08 S65, 06 M3 CS(stick), 02 BMW X5 4.6iS, 07 R1 Raven, 08 F-450 4x4, 08 CooperS JCW
You drive a Lamborghini...clap clap...go collect your medal
11-28-2006, 03:01 AM
#39
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: mymbonline
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mymbonline
this dude needs mad help.
in reality its because improviz (and the rest of us) are right and he has nothing to say so he resorts to using personal attacks.
(he probably has a little weenie also)
11-28-2006, 03:32 AM
#40
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Irvine Ca
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
M3
ROFLMAO!!! My face hurts from laughing so hard.. Yo Lambo dude.. Are you high on meth?? A gallardo will get prison raped by any 65 AMG.. But I do give you props for coming back after that severe lashing..
Last edited by OUTLAW///M3 SMG; 11-28-2006 at 03:34 AM.
11-28-2006, 01:39 PM
#42
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: san francisco
Posts: 999
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C32
11-28-2006, 02:21 PM
#43
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,731
Received 561 Likes
on
371 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
11-28-2006, 06:41 PM
#45
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: mymbonline
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mymbonline
11-28-2006, 07:54 PM
#46
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 10,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
11-28-2006, 10:33 PM
#48
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 10,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
11-29-2006, 02:35 PM
#50
............wow!!!
It is okay to argue about what car is faster, but anyone that actually believes that an S65 does 0-60 in 5.1 secs is NOT a car guy. Even if you think that gallardo is faster than an S65, you surely cannot belive that an S65 does 0-60 in 5.1 secs. That is slower than an S55 and slower a G55. So if you know anything about cars, you instantly realize the absurdity of the 5.1 secs for an S65.
Ted
It is okay to argue about what car is faster, but anyone that actually believes that an S65 does 0-60 in 5.1 secs is NOT a car guy. Even if you think that gallardo is faster than an S65, you surely cannot belive that an S65 does 0-60 in 5.1 secs. That is slower than an S55 and slower a G55. So if you know anything about cars, you instantly realize the absurdity of the 5.1 secs for an S65.
Ted
Last edited by Ted Baldwin; 11-29-2006 at 02:37 PM.
