S55 AMG, S65 AMG , S63 AMG (W220, W221) 2001 - 2013 (Two Generations)

Raced an M5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-29-2009, 12:16 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Ferri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2011 Hyundai Elantra GLS
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
Go ahead and get insulted about someone questioning something you said on the internet, you'll be making weepy youtube videos in five minutes. I'm just stating the facts as I've seen them over 3 years of owning this car, and the mathematical improbability that is your assertion.

There is simply nothing, nothing from power to weight to gearbox setup that gives a stock S600 the advantage over an M5. None. I've personally raced a W220 S600 and it did not stand a chance on a properly staged 60-120 race. You can go ahead and check out my own youtube videos where I run neck and neck with a Kleemann K2 SL55.
To paraphrase Ayn Rand's "Atlas Shrugged," it is only when you deal with pure science that you seek the absolute truth (or mathematical probability, in this case). In applied settings, many other factors come into considerations, not least of which the human factor. Then, something other than mathematical probability is asked for. So, I don't see how your probabilities, or even your experiences, are enough to disprove the other guy's conclusions which seem based, to plenty of evidence, in his real world observations. Short of videos, how else can anyone in internet prove they are legit???
Old 07-29-2009, 12:46 PM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,706
Received 542 Likes on 359 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Originally Posted by Ferri
To paraphrase Ayn Rand's "Atlas Shrugged," it is only when you deal with pure science that you seek the absolute truth (or mathematical probability, in this case). In applied settings, many other factors come into considerations, not least of which the human factor. Then, something other than mathematical probability is asked for. So, I don't see how your probabilities, or even your experiences, are enough to disprove the other guy's conclusions which seem based, to plenty of evidence, in his real world observations. Short of videos, how else can anyone in internet prove they are legit???
I just love it when someone waxes philosophical when they haven't read the thread. So I'm going to make sure the importants stuff is in big letters for everybody. Akademiks realized a few posts ago that while he was talking about his experiences with his SL600 when we were talking about the S600 instead.
Old 07-29-2009, 01:21 PM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
E55AMGGG04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
04 w211 E55
Originally Posted by SL600 V12TT
Hard to believe that a M5 can beat a SL600. Hearing this from an M5 owner . I already have raced few and pooped on them. Did I also mention the same outcome goes for the M6. I didnt know u needed some skill to drive smg. Since you live in Jersey maybe I can show you some *** kicking in my stock 600

I love BMW FAN BOYZ
Hey I replied to one of ur preious posts on the kill section. I was wondering if you would like to have a freindly run with my stock E55. I'm actually in rockaway nj right now but with my infiniti. Let me know so I can bring the 55 1 day. I would like to see that 600 in action if your up for it .
Old 07-29-2009, 01:28 PM
  #29  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Carl Lassiter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: L.A., CA
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'08 M5, '10 Land Cruiser
Originally Posted by SL600 V12TT
Hard to believe that a M5 can beat a SL600. Hearing this from an M5 owner . I already have raced few and pooped on them. Did I also mention the same outcome goes for the M6. I didnt know u needed some skill to drive smg. Since you live in Jersey maybe I can show you some *** kicking in my stock 600

I love BMW FAN BOYZ
The above post is classic proof that every day the MB-brand gets closer and closer to the stereotypes long associated with BMW.
Old 07-29-2009, 02:02 PM
  #30  
Banned
 
Akademiks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL600
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
I just love it when someone waxes philosophical when they haven't read the thread. So I'm going to make sure the importants stuff is in big letters for everybody. Akademiks realized a few posts ago that while he was talking about his experiences with his SL600 when we were talking about the S600 instead.
Wrong. I've known the entire time; the only reason I was speaking on the issue is because I thought they (S & SL) were even in performance.
Old 07-29-2009, 02:58 PM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Thericker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
This thread got me curious as to just what the heavy Stock S600 can do down the 1320' w/all that pesky TQ (w/Drag Rad's to properly harness that power) by board member here...

http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...lip-11391.html

1/4 Mile ET: 11.972
1/4 Mile MPH: 114.700
1/8 Mile ET: 7.709
1/8 Mile MPH: 91.080
0-60 Foot ET: 1.755
Temperature F: 50.0
Density Altitude (DA): DA Calculator
Timeslip Scan:
Car Make: Mercedes-Benz
Car Model: S600
Car Type: Designo
Car Year: 2003
Driver: Stephen F. Selden
Old 07-29-2009, 04:31 PM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TMC M5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,895
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
'14 E63S & '14 Audi SQ5
Originally Posted by Thericker
This thread got me curious as to just what the heavy Stock S600 can do down the 1320' w/all that pesky TQ (w/Drag Rad's to properly harness that power) by board member here...

http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...lip-11391.html

1/4 Mile ET: 11.972
1/4 Mile MPH: 114.700
1/8 Mile ET: 7.709
1/8 Mile MPH: 91.080
0-60 Foot ET: 1.755
Temperature F: 50.0
Density Altitude (DA): DA Calculator
Timeslip Scan:
Car Make: Mercedes-Benz
Car Model: S600
Car Type: Designo
Car Year: 2003
Driver: Stephen F. Selden
I think it would be more valuable to look at the 1/8 mile trap vs the 1/4 mile trap as a proxy for a highway run. Steve's S600 picks up 23.7mph over that distance.

Here are two runs on dragtimes for some stock M5's:

1/4 Mile ET: 12.301
1/4 Mile MPH: 115.810
1/8 Mile ET: 8.022
1/8 Mile MPH: 90.740
0-60 Foot ET: 1.860
Temperature F: 0.0
Car Make: BMW
Car Model: M5
Car Year: 2006
Driver: Mr. Vroom

1/4 Mile ET: 12.992
1/4 Mile MPH: 116.360
1/8 Mile ET: 8.716
1/8 Mile MPH: 90.740
0-60 Foot ET: 2.460
Temperature F: 65.0
Car Make: BMW
Car Model: M5
Car Year: 2006
Driver: Erol Buyuk

You will notice that both M5's pick up 25+mph over the same distance. Granted, most races don't start at 90mph and end 115mph, this is just an academic exercise to demonstrate the M5's ability to move above 100mph. The S600 is no slouch...but it is hard for it in stock form to overcome the gearing and weight disadvantages on a freeway run. From a dig, my money is on the S600 (especially with drag radials).

Tom

Last edited by TMC M5; 07-29-2009 at 04:34 PM.
Old 07-29-2009, 04:41 PM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Thericker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Originally Posted by TMC M5
I think it would be more valuable to look at the 1/8 mile trap vs the 1/4 mile trap as a proxy for a highway run. Steve's S600 picks up 23.7mph over that distance.

Here are two runs on dragtimes for some stock M5's:

1/4 Mile ET: 12.301
1/4 Mile MPH: 115.810
1/8 Mile ET: 8.022
1/8 Mile MPH: 90.740
0-60 Foot ET: 1.860
Temperature F: 0.0
Car Make: BMW
Car Model: M5
Car Year: 2006
Driver: Mr. Vroom

1/4 Mile ET: 12.992
1/4 Mile MPH: 116.360
1/8 Mile ET: 8.716
1/8 Mile MPH: 90.740
0-60 Foot ET: 2.460
Temperature F: 65.0
Car Make: BMW
Car Model: M5
Car Year: 2006
Driver: Erol Buyuk

You will notice that both M5's pick up 25+mph over the same distance. Granted, most races don't start at 90mph and end 115mph, this is just an academic exercise to demonstrate the M5's ability to move above 100mph. The S600 is no slouch...but it is hard for it in stock form to overcome the gearing and weight disadvantages on a freeway run. From a dig, my money is on the S600 (especially with drag radials).

Tom
Totally agree, I didn't mean to post the 1/4 mile data as direct comparo to street frwy roll-on, I already agreed the M5 would/should take S600 in that venue

Edit: Seems I misspoke, after researching Dragtimes the M5 isn't Trapping 117+ in stock form, the lighter M6 is...

http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M6-Timeslip-16499.html

1/4 Mile ET: 12.323
1/4 Mile MPH: 117.190
1/8 Mile ET: 8.134
1/8 Mile MPH: 92.940
0-60 Foot ET: 2.068
Temperature F: 52.0
Density Altitude (DA): -332 feet
Timeslip Scan:
Car Make: BMW
Car Model: M6
Car Type:
Car Year: 2008
Driver: Ned Cejaj

M5 is averaging 115+ in completely stock form...

Last edited by Thericker; 07-29-2009 at 04:59 PM.
Old 07-29-2009, 04:51 PM
  #34  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TMC M5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,895
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
'14 E63S & '14 Audi SQ5
Originally Posted by Thericker
Totally agree, I didn't mean to post the 1/4 mile data as direct comparo to street frwy roll-on, I already agreed the M5 would/should take S600 in that venue
I didn't take it that way...your post made me think of a way to apply the 1/4 mile information to the freeway scenario.

Tom
Old 07-29-2009, 05:05 PM
  #35  
Super Member
 
TopEndS62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY/Tampa, FL
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 BLK/BLK E-Double Nickel.
Originally Posted by SL600 V12TT
I didnt know u needed some skill to drive smg.
FYI
Driving and understanding the conventional 6-speed, gives the driver a better concept of how to operate the SMGIII. Trust me its not all gas ad go. It does require a bit of skill. Not all E60 M5 owners do not know how to properly operate their cars...
Old 07-30-2009, 08:44 AM
  #36  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ItalianStallion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
R35 GT-R, EvoX
Driving stick is not as amazing a feat as everyone makes it. It's just a simple technique for racing (keep gas pedal floored, quickly hit the clutch and grab next gear, depress clutch) and once you learn it, it's a piece of cake. SMG also uses a bit of technique because you have to know how the car reacts. To make the M5 the highway killer it's reknown for, every shift has to be at 8250RPM's. You must click it at precisely the right moment. Too soon and you lose the race. Too late and the fuel shuts off and you lose as well. It just takes practice and not much more than that.

The M5 pulls hard past 100mph. But if the driver isn't experienced and gets a little nervous, as I have seen time and time again in a race, the S600 can easily have the upper hand.
Old 07-30-2009, 09:38 AM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
MikeG_C63_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hoboken,NJ
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
09 Eurocharged C63 AMG
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
And it's been discussed ad-nauseum here that your own observations are unique for any number of reasons, mostly because nobody here believes your car is stock. Second of all, the math just isn't there. At highway speeds torque has long been left behind, it's about horsepower/weight/gearing. The M5 has the advantage in all 3 categories, most strikingly in the close-ratio gearbox.

I take no responsibility for M5 drivers who can't drive their cars, but I can tell you that I've beaten stock 600's, 63's and 55's.
CH I'm just curious what 63's you have beaten. I know as a stock C63 I would be beaten, but what have your results been Vs an E63, S63, SL63?
Old 07-30-2009, 09:50 AM
  #38  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ItalianStallion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
R35 GT-R, EvoX
Originally Posted by MikeG_C63_AMG
CH I'm just curious what 63's you have beaten. I know as a stock C63 I would be beaten, but what have your results been Vs an E63, S63, SL63?
From a light to light race, sure there is a good chance at beating the M5.

On a highway run it's a different story. I can't see a bone stock C63 beating an M5 on a highway pull.
Old 07-31-2009, 01:01 AM
  #39  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
soldier2304's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C63 AMG(sold), 2009 CL550, 2010 S550 Majestic Black, 2010 ML550, 2006 C230, 2009 Venza
Originally Posted by ItalianStallion
From a light to light race, sure there is a good chance at beating the M5.

On a highway run it's a different story. I can't see a bone stock C63 beating an M5 on a highway pull.
This is what it did to a stock M5(famous for highway speeds)with just a TUNE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4718vN0kL3M

It probly wont beat it stock vs stock. But it will stay neck to neck
Old 07-31-2009, 09:09 AM
  #40  
Super Member
 
TopEndS62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY/Tampa, FL
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 BLK/BLK E-Double Nickel.
Originally Posted by ItalianStallion
I can't see a bone stock C63 beating an M5 on a highway pull.

I totally agree.
Old 07-31-2009, 10:19 AM
  #41  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ItalianStallion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
R35 GT-R, EvoX
Originally Posted by soldier2304
This is what it did to a stock M5(famous for highway speeds)with just a TUNE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4718vN0kL3M

It probly wont beat it stock vs stock. But it will stay neck to neck
The tune seems to make a big difference on these cars. Great vid though and thanks for sharing!
Old 07-31-2009, 05:41 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
housclass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Friendswood, TX
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'08 CLS63
if it matters...because you will always have people that doubt and love talking numbers instead of real world....i've raced in my stock s600...
1. c63...not even close
2. E55...first gear roll from 25 up to 75...had him by three
3. E55...(a different one) first gear roll up to 80...had him by 2-3 cars. we did it from a stoplight and had him by 2 cars at 60.
4. M5...from 50...he was 1/2 car ahead at the start and by the time we hit 100 i was one car in front.

never under estimate torque...even from a roll.

just my personal experiences...go ahead and start flaming.

when my e55 ran 11.85 stock all the haters came out then enzom runs .70's a year later and then everybody decided it was real...true bench racing at work!!!

john
Old 07-31-2009, 06:31 PM
  #43  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
itsmeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: D.C. METRO AREA
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nissan GT-R cobb/midpipe/ic piping/wastegate actuators/tials
I'm confused- are you modded housclass?
Old 08-01-2009, 01:22 AM
  #44  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Thericker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Originally Posted by itsmeek
I'm confused- are you modded housclass?
Originally Posted by housclass
if it matters...because you will always have people that doubt and love talking numbers instead of real world....i've raced in my stock s600...
1. c63...not even close
2. E55...first gear roll from 25 up to 75...had him by three
3. E55...(a different one) first gear roll up to 80...had him by 2-3 cars. we did it from a stoplight and had him by 2 cars at 60.
4. M5...from 50...he was 1/2 car ahead at the start and by the time we hit 100 i was one car in front.

never under estimate torque...even from a roll.

just my personal experiences...go ahead and start flaming.

when my e55 ran 11.85 stock all the haters came out then enzom runs .70's a year later and then everybody decided it was real...true bench racing at work!!!

john
Nice! interesting results, ever get her dyno'd?

Last edited by Thericker; 08-01-2009 at 01:24 AM.
Old 08-01-2009, 08:55 AM
  #45  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TMC M5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,895
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
'14 E63S & '14 Audi SQ5
Originally Posted by housclass
if it matters...because you will always have people that doubt and love talking numbers instead of real world....i've raced in my stock s600...
1. c63...not even close
2. E55...first gear roll from 25 up to 75...had him by three
3. E55...(a different one) first gear roll up to 80...had him by 2-3 cars. we did it from a stoplight and had him by 2 cars at 60.
4. M5...from 50...he was 1/2 car ahead at the start and by the time we hit 100 i was one car in front.

never under estimate torque...even from a roll.

just my personal experiences...go ahead and start flaming.

when my e55 ran 11.85 stock all the haters came out then enzom runs .70's a year later and then everybody decided it was real...true bench racing at work!!!

john
I think everyone realizes anything can happen out on the streets. By your own experience you beat an E55 with your S600. Yet looking at your signature, your E55 (11.85 @ 118 mph) would have walloped your S600 (12.2 @ 113mph) in a straight up match from a dig or even a roll.

There are people over on the M5board who claim to have taken down 65's in stock or near stock M5's. Yes, that could happen, but there are mitigating circumstances...just as there are mitigating circumstances to why an M5 could get passed above 100mph by an S600. If pointing this out makes me or others a "bench racer" than so be it.

Tom
Old 08-01-2009, 12:04 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
charles pearson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dinwiddie, VA
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
SL55, CL55, Range Rover, Lexus LX470
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
I just love it when someone waxes philosophical when they haven't read the thread. So I'm going to make sure the importants stuff is in big letters for everybody. Akademiks realized a few posts ago that while he was talking about his experiences with his SL600 when we were talking about the S600 instead.
LMAO, you guys are killing me. The human factor does exist, while these beautiful cars are sitting parked somewhere in a garage, there are two guys comparing and contrasting their issues with one another, while the cars have absolutely no control over the fact that "Man" has designed them to be what they are. Face it, you can place one guy in the S600 one day and another guy in it the next, you will see a difference in the two as they run up on the M5. One day the M5 may win and one day the S600 may win, who knows. However I have to agree with the probability of weight, gear ratio, rwhp,torque, and the conditions that are in place at the moment. Personally I could care less, because I like and drive what I want and were I want, besides each car has it's own personality. For the ones who hate the limiter being set at 155mph, do what I did and get it delimited, yes it does suck to have those restrictions on your AMG's, but understand that you need to upgrade in brakes and Tire speed rating. Those cars from what I am understanding have that limit due to the type of speed rated tires that they are putting on these cars stocked.
Old 08-01-2009, 12:50 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
housclass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Friendswood, TX
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'08 CLS63
Originally Posted by TMC M5
I think everyone realizes anything can happen out on the streets. By your own experience you beat an E55 with your S600. Yet looking at your signature, your E55 (11.85 @ 118 mph) would have walloped your S600 (12.2 @ 113mph) in a straight up match from a dig or even a roll.

Tom
good point...don't forget the 55 was run on a -1600 da night at hrp...the 600 wasn't. also...the 600 was impossible to launch at the strip that night. my brothers s65 ran 117 on radials and 123 on D/R's...most of the time when 60' times go down, so does mph...but not in this case. this is why i say numbers racing is useless.

if anybody in houston wants to meet up let me know...work on the north side...woodlads and live on the south side friendswood.

and my car is stock with 90k miles.

take care,

john

Last edited by housclass; 08-01-2009 at 12:56 PM.
Old 08-01-2009, 12:53 PM
  #48  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
soldier2304's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C63 AMG(sold), 2009 CL550, 2010 S550 Majestic Black, 2010 ML550, 2006 C230, 2009 Venza
Originally Posted by housclass
if it matters...because you will always have people that doubt and love talking numbers instead of real world....i've raced in my stock s600...
1. c63...not even close
2. E55...first gear roll from 25 up to 75...had him by three
3. E55...(a different one) first gear roll up to 80...had him by 2-3 cars. we did it from a stoplight and had him by 2 cars at 60.
4. M5...from 50...he was 1/2 car ahead at the start and by the time we hit 100 i was one car in front.

never under estimate torque...even from a roll.

just my personal experiences...go ahead and start flaming.

when my e55 ran 11.85 stock all the haters came out then enzom runs .70's a year later and then everybody decided it was real...true bench racing at work!!!

john
LOL personal experiences?
Old 08-01-2009, 01:01 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
housclass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Friendswood, TX
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'08 CLS63
Originally Posted by soldier2304
LOL personal experiences?
get a buddy of yours in houston with a stock c63 to meet up with me. i live in friendswood on the south side of town...should be an easy kill for ya!
Old 08-01-2009, 05:46 PM
  #50  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
soldier2304's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C63 AMG(sold), 2009 CL550, 2010 S550 Majestic Black, 2010 ML550, 2006 C230, 2009 Venza
should be an easy kill for ya!
Im pretty sure an S600 will beat a C63 stock vs stock. But come on to say somethin like " not even close" is like saying you'll pull 6-7 cars on one.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Raced an M5



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:09 AM.