S55 AMG, S65 AMG , S63 AMG (W220, W221) 2001 - 2013 (Two Generations)

Underwhelmed by S65?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-17-2010, 10:20 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
96 and 08 911 turbos
Underwhelmed by S65?

so I've driven two separate 221 S65s and I've really been underwhelmed.

I haven't gotten on the throttle hard, as I'm aware of the ultimate power, but around town, the throttle response seems very laggy, the brake pedal is mushy, and the steering feels a bit wooden. The transmission also seemed slow to downshift and even in S mode, you had to give the car a lot of throttle to get moving.

Both cars were 2007s with about 40k miles in good shape.

I have been impressed with the ride quality even with 20s though.

I figured this would be a "gotta have it" type of experience compared to my 05 S500, but around town, I prefer my 220 actually. Clearly ultimate power is no comparison, but I wasn't blown away.

Now this car will be for my 60 year old mother (shes pretty cool), so its ultimately not my choice, but I guess I expected more from Mercedes' Flagship performance sedan.

anybody else get the same feeling? did you get over it?

thanks
Old 05-17-2010, 10:46 PM
  #2  
Super Member
 
Fraser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Long Island, NY & SE England
Posts: 960
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
A Mercedes obviously!
Do you have a flameproof suit to hand?
Old 05-18-2010, 04:04 AM
  #3  
Super Member
 
Viet_Amg408's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Pinto
Originally Posted by Oliverk
so I've driven two separate 221 S65s and I've really been underwhelmed.

I haven't gotten on the throttle hard
, as I'm aware of the ultimate power, but around town, the throttle response seems very laggy, the brake pedal is mushy, and the steering feels a bit wooden. The transmission also seemed slow to downshift and even in S mode, you had to give the car a lot of throttle to get moving.

Both cars were 2007s with about 40k miles in good shape.

I have been impressed with the ride quality even with 20s though.

I figured this would be a "gotta have it" type of experience compared to my 05 S500, but around town, I prefer my 220 actually. Clearly ultimate power is no comparison, but I wasn't blown away.

Now this car will be for my 60 year old mother (shes pretty cool), so its ultimately not my choice, but I guess I expected more from Mercedes' Flagship performance sedan.

anybody else get the same feeling? did you get over it?

thanks

why don't you full throttle and see what happen
Old 05-18-2010, 07:39 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
96 and 08 911 turbos
I know the car is fast, thats not the point.

99% of the time, I will not be WOT, and nor will she.

Hence, I was a bit disappointed with the way the car drove around town.

Fraser, I spose I might need it.

Have you compared the 600 to 65? Does the 600 have that same throttle lag at light throttle openings?
Old 05-18-2010, 08:45 AM
  #5  
Super Member
 
Fraser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Long Island, NY & SE England
Posts: 960
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
A Mercedes obviously!
Originally Posted by Oliverk
Have you compared the 600 to 65? Does the 600 have that same throttle lag at light throttle openings?
I haven't, no.

The 600 is plenty enough for the majority of my driving...though I wouldn't mind giving a 65 a spin for a few days

I'm slightly surprised by your assessment as I thought the 65 would be more of a fire breathing dragon at all times...that said the Top Gear review of the '05 CL65 did give me the impression the 65 really comes into its own (versus other quick vehicles) whilst you're on the move and looking for extra beans.
Old 05-18-2010, 09:04 AM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
96 and 08 911 turbos
oh yeah, I'm sure if you are dawdling along at 60 and need to pass, pounding the throttle will deliver very well.

But leaving stop lights and stuff, the car felt very awkward to drive.
Old 05-18-2010, 10:17 AM
  #7  
Banned
 
Gondon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
02 S500 Sport
I think the W221 is just that smooth that it gave you the illusion.
Old 05-18-2010, 10:31 AM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Blk04cobra1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2002 S430, 2004 Cobra, 2004 Tahoe
It's confusing to hear someone say that it didn't wow them. I have to agree that a 55 engine would give you more stop light to stop light fun, but the 65 is an animal. When I drove a 221 over my 220 I thought it felt larger, but wasnt that much different. I did however prefer the way the 221 handles over my 220.
Old 05-18-2010, 10:54 AM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
96 and 08 911 turbos
folks, I think there is a misunderstanding here.

I am not referring to engine power or accelerative abilities. I'm talking about throttle response from step off.

In other words, when leaving a light gentle or gently applying the throttle, the response from the the pedal is very laggy. It may need one of those sprint booster things.

I'm not talking about the engine power whatsoever.
Old 05-18-2010, 11:14 AM
  #10  
Super Member
 
rondocap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Mercedes S55 AMG
Oliverk, I hear what you are saying - in fact other people have commented on this too. The 65's seem to need a little more push to get them going, the throttle isn't as "alive" per say as a 55 engine. Maybe that's due to the amount of power and nature of the 65. I think it really is more at home accelerating when already at slightly higher speeds, then it's a monster. From a stop, obviously there are issues putting all of that power down on four wheels.

If you want that get up and go feeling on the throttle, the 55 engines usually feel a bit more spirited from a stop. The S63 has less torque than the 55's, but in general I think it is also a bit livelier around town than the 65. It's all based on how it's driven though, I'm sure if you drive the 65 aggressively everywhere, even from a stop light, that power difference you will definitely feel. First, as traction issues - but later as a big wallop of power when it hooks!


Look at it this way too, with 604 horsepower and even more torque, the engineers could not have made that pedal too responsive or lively from the get go- who knows what sort of directions you'd be spinning in in certain situations with that much power and a lively pedal! It'd be like a dodge viper or something.

Last edited by rondocap; 05-18-2010 at 11:17 AM. Reason: aa
Old 05-18-2010, 11:16 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
96 and 08 911 turbos
I think that explains it well.
I think its kind of ridiculous that my mother is buying this car as she'll hardly ever use the power, but thats what she wants.

I've never really been drawn to AMG cars, as I prefer my MB's quiet, soft, and luxurious. I tend to go with other brands for sporting vehicles.

fwiw, my father's SL55 has similar throttle response. Takes some getting used to for sure.
Old 05-18-2010, 02:00 PM
  #12  
Super Member
 
Stephen04E55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mechanicsville, VA
Posts: 852
Received 39 Likes on 29 Posts
'09 CLK550, '21 Camaro ZL1 1LE, '06 C55 AMG, '20 AMG GT53
I have had both an 600 and 65 series W220 and notice similar laggy throttle response. The 600 had a similar feel before tuning by Renntech. After tuning the 600 felt much quicker to respond and more fun to drive at light throttle situations. My recent 2006 S65 is very laggy and slow to motivate but has a lot of reserve when you step deeper into the pedal. I will get tuning sometime soon and see if it helps and possibly as sprint booster as you metioned. Overall, I am impressed with my 65 as it feels much sportier than my '03 S600 with handling situations. The 19" wheels and Michelin Pilot Sports are probably the reason for this.
Old 05-18-2010, 02:10 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TMC M5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,895
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
'14 E63S & '14 Audi SQ5
I also think the adaptive nature of the throttle/transmission amplifies the "laggy" throttle. If the car hasn't been driven hard, the throttle/gear changes will seem a bit slow. You can try disconnecting the battery and seeing if it resets...or try smashing the throttle a few times to see if it finally wakes up the throttle.

Tom
Old 05-18-2010, 02:26 PM
  #14  
Super Member
 
Fraser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Long Island, NY & SE England
Posts: 960
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
A Mercedes obviously!
Originally Posted by rondocap
Oliverk, I hear what you are saying - in fact other people have commented on this too. The 65's seem to need a little more push to get them going, the throttle isn't as "alive" per say as a 55 engine. Maybe that's due to the amount of power and nature of the 65. I think it really is more at home accelerating when already at slightly higher speeds, then it's a monster. From a stop, obviously there are issues putting all of that power down on four wheels.

If you want that get up and go feeling on the throttle, the 55 engines usually feel a bit more spirited from a stop. The S63 has less torque than the 55's, but in general I think it is also a bit livelier around town than the 65. It's all based on how it's driven though, I'm sure if you drive the 65 aggressively everywhere, even from a stop light, that power difference you will definitely feel. First, as traction issues - but later as a big wallop of power when it hooks!
I think you're getting dangerously close to mentioning 'TQ friendly Bay Area highways' and how 65 is best engineered car in the world for daily commuting...
Old 05-18-2010, 02:37 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
96 and 08 911 turbos
Originally Posted by Fraser
I think you're getting dangerously close to mentioning 'TQ friendly Bay Area highways' and how 65 is best engineered car in the world for daily commuting...
oh jeez. i can't wait for wsh to come in and tell me his cl65 handles better than a 997 GT3 porker
Old 05-18-2010, 03:03 PM
  #16  
Super Member
 
Corsa9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: California USA
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 S55 ///AMG, 2007 E350
Oliver,

I own a 2004 S55 and have driven a few S63's and S65's at AMG events. I found the throttle response to be quick and no mushy feel with brake application. Could the cars you drove be in need of brake fluid flush since this is not a common chracteristic of the W221 AMG's?

Also, as you well know the adaptive transmission software can slow down throttle response if car was driven slowly previously.
Old 05-18-2010, 05:20 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Addicted2Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lotus Elise SLK55
With over 700lb-ft torque at 2k RPM's it needs a slow throttle response or it would be near impossible to drive smoothly lol. You can install sprintbooster if you want a faster throttle response.
Old 05-18-2010, 06:26 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
absent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kenilworth, il usa
Posts: 2,924
Received 378 Likes on 244 Posts
'22 Alpina B7,'21 G63 Renntech obviously (wife), Wrangler(kids)
Originally Posted by Oliverk
oh jeez. i can't wait for wsh to come in and tell me his cl65 handles better than a 997 GT3 porker
You forgot to insert "Volkswagen" 997 GT3.....

Old 05-18-2010, 07:25 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
96 and 08 911 turbos
Originally Posted by Corsa9000
Oliver,

I own a 2004 S55 and have driven a few S63's and S65's at AMG events. I found the throttle response to be quick and no mushy feel with brake application. Could the cars you drove be in need of brake fluid flush since this is not a common chracteristic of the W221 AMG's?

Also, as you well know the adaptive transmission software can slow down throttle response if car was driven slowly previously.
there are any number of possibilities. they were both cpo cars, so all service should be up to date. i will admit that the car yesterday had worn brakes (damn they are pricey).

I could always do a quick ecu reset before driving.

Originally Posted by Addicted2Speed
With over 700lb-ft torque at 2k RPM's it needs a slow throttle response or it would be near impossible to drive smoothly lol. You can install sprintbooster if you want a faster throttle response.
700lbft occurs at wide open throttle. you can have a responsive pedal and be perfectly fine. The car will only accelerate as hard as your right foot will let it.
Old 05-18-2010, 07:30 PM
  #20  
Super Member
 
rondocap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Mercedes S55 AMG
Haha yeah, I think I read so many s class forum archives that soon I will be sounding like wsh...

Oliverk, any particular reason your mother wants this car instead of the other s-classes, especially since she won't really use the power? Even people who use the power sometimes have a hard time choosing it over an S600 or S63! It's definitely more exclusive, but few people pay attention to the fact it's an AMG, much less to the fact that it's a rarer 65 vs say, a 63.
Old 05-18-2010, 08:39 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
96 and 08 911 turbos
honestly, I couldn't tell you. she likes the looks and exclusivity.

crazy women I tell ya.
Old 05-18-2010, 11:28 PM
  #22  
Super Member
 
rondocap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Mercedes S55 AMG
Heh, yeah I know how it is! Is she considering anything else?

Also remember down the line, the maintenance is going to be a bit more expensive than the other S models, mainly due to certain items like the brakes.
Old 05-19-2010, 12:08 AM
  #23  
Super Member
 
nick 55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
GL550, C55, 335i Coupe, vintage Mustang
Originally Posted by Oliverk
oh jeez. i can't wait for wsh to come in and tell me his cl65 handles better than a 997 GT3 porker
He wouldn't own a CL65 anymore since it is old, outdated, dangerous technology now. I think the airbags rot in his cars after 4 months.

Nick
Old 05-19-2010, 05:11 AM
  #24  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
JonMBZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: California
Posts: 2,357
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
06 C55, 09 E350
I think the car is designed to still be a smooth ride since it's an S, I would imagine if you managed to tap the kick down switch it would turn into beast mode. Also a sprint booster mod would probably help. With all the power this car has it would be pretty scary for it to always take off as soon as you hit the pedal and it would scare the people that do have the money for this car and want it just for the reasons your wife would. Could you imagine if the car was spinning tires each time you hit the gas? I think you wife might have a different outlook on the car if she couldn't drive it like a normal vehicle.
Old 05-19-2010, 09:17 AM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
96 and 08 911 turbos
Originally Posted by rondocap
Heh, yeah I know how it is! Is she considering anything else?

Also remember down the line, the maintenance is going to be a bit more expensive than the other S models, mainly due to certain items like the brakes.
Yeah, I have fairly decent source for parts and have a good amount of experience working on Mercedes and other makes. I'm not too concerned with maintenance, but I agree $3k for brake parts is shocking.

Originally Posted by nick 55
He wouldn't own a CL65 anymore since it is old, outdated, dangerous technology now. I think the airbags rot in his cars after 4 months.

Nick
haha I know what you mean. But since the Porsche panamera has junk reliability and poor safety features, not to mention girly torque. Lol, he is so ridiculous.

Originally Posted by JonMBZ
I think the car is designed to still be a smooth ride since it's an S, I would imagine if you managed to tap the kick down switch it would turn into beast mode. Also a sprint booster mod would probably help. With all the power this car has it would be pretty scary for it to always take off as soon as you hit the pedal and it would scare the people that do have the money for this car and want it just for the reasons your wife would. Could you imagine if the car was spinning tires each time you hit the gas? I think you wife might have a different outlook on the car if she couldn't drive it like a normal vehicle.
guys, its not like the car hits 700lb ft of torque with a little throttle application. The only time this happens is at full boost i.e. at full throttle. Most cars that have over 400bhp will spin the tires if you floor it from a stop. The car could have a responsive throttle without being dangerous.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Underwhelmed by S65?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:33 AM.