Why buy a GT43 instead of GT63?
As said in the video. Differences between the top of the notch GT63 and the base GT43 are very minor in exterior and interior looks. Major differences are engine and exhausts.
Is the GT43 unnecesarry if you consider the CLS43 and CLS53?




4.9sec. to 100kmh (4.8 to 60); you'll be passed my many SUV's. And this car is well spec'd + CCB's so it will cost more than a base E63s. Performance is a key part of any AMG and a lowly A35 will blow past that car. That would feel embarrassing...
Trending Topics
4.9sec. to 100kmh (4.8 to 60); you'll be passed my many SUV's. And this car is well spec'd + CCB's so it will cost more than a base E63s. Performance is a key part of any AMG and a lowly A35 will blow past that car. That would feel embarrassing...
Let 'em pass! I'll be in the slow lane enjoying the ride
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




Runs 11.5 with a 128mph trap per C&D. Never tested it yet via our Dragy but the GT models get faster as they pickup speed.
Last edited by Orcbolg; Oct 4, 2019 at 07:42 AM.
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...mparison-test/
For those who don't want to read it all, here is a partial data panel. GTS is in the middle.
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...mparison-test/
For those who don't want to read it all, here is a partial data panel. GTS is in the middle.
Ah, yeah, C&D #s are bogus, they change their numbers are never accurate, as they use rollout and further change the number to simulated elevation.
Once traction is achieved, a RWD car with same horsepower will gain on and eventually pass a 4MATIC car with the same rated HP, since it is delivering more of it to the wheels
S63/S65 make a good example, the S63 is considered 'faster' because of its better 0-60 w/ 4MATIC, but the S65 will eventually pass it








