100-200 kph 60-124mph times
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 61
Likes: 1
Mercedes Benz E63 AMG
100-200 kph 60-124mph times
Hey guys i saw the discussion about m5/m6 vs our m157 platform and one member Said we are only comparing with dyno Numbers.
so i wanted to know your 60-124mph times respectively in germany we compare 100-200 kph times
I Start then:
100-200kph in 5.7 with a lot of traction Problems
Turbo Pipes and Catless Pipes 76mm /3"
ECU and Piggyback together
Michelin PSS 285/30 20inch
Turbo Upgrade Stage 1 only Cold side wheel and Compressor back side is stock
Weistec Heat Exchanger
so i wanted to know your 60-124mph times respectively in germany we compare 100-200 kph times
I Start then:
100-200kph in 5.7 with a lot of traction Problems
Turbo Pipes and Catless Pipes 76mm /3"
ECU and Piggyback together
Michelin PSS 285/30 20inch
Turbo Upgrade Stage 1 only Cold side wheel and Compressor back side is stock
Weistec Heat Exchanger
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 53
From: Maryland
'14 E63S & '14 Audi SQ5
Have you guys found that starting the run in the right gear (3rd?) is faster for 60-130mph/100-200kmh than accelerating from standing start? I know I was .3 to .4 seconds faster that way with other platforms (obviously with different gearing).
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 40
CLS63 AMG
I've been trying to get to the bottom of this. I too have been told by many that tuned m157 while great for low-mid range power are not strong on "top end" because "dynos" show that after 4K rpm the torque and power falls flat on its face.
But there's many ways besides high rpm to make good top end power and if m157 stays in meat of its powerband most of the time, it can just be using low revs with LOTS of torque to get a strong top end power vs something like m5 which has decent torque but with high revs to give it a strong top end.
so bottom line is it true that this engine design is not good on top end?
But there's many ways besides high rpm to make good top end power and if m157 stays in meat of its powerband most of the time, it can just be using low revs with LOTS of torque to get a strong top end power vs something like m5 which has decent torque but with high revs to give it a strong top end.
so bottom line is it true that this engine design is not good on top end?
Super Member
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 773
Likes: 44
C300
never tried from the roll though
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 341
Likes: 55
2014 E63 S model
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes Teases Updated EQS With Steer-By-Wire and a Yoke
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 40
CLS63 AMG
yes this is right. If starting the pull from 100 as opposed to from 0 it's 6.0 seconds flat vs 6.7s with tune+catless dp+air filters from what I've tested.
Super Member
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 773
Likes: 44
C300
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 40
CLS63 AMG
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 119
From: Behind the wheel
The best or nothing
Super Member
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 773
Likes: 44
C300
Member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 120
Likes: 18
From: Moscow, Russia
Mercedes E63 AMG S 4Matik
