SL/R230: New 2005 SL 500 NOT
#26
Originally Posted by jlr
No issue at all. I was soliciting opinions on what exactly is the practical rather than rhetorical difference of accepting the "used" car with 191 miles on it or insisting on a "new" car if it had 191 miles on it (if that be the case). As an attorney, I assure you that I am well aware of the legal isues regarding enforcing a contract for a "new" car " and the "simple" issues--I was hoping for a more pragmatic response that I have received from others.
Well, I'm puzzled even more. The practical issue is that you would be agreeing to accept a second hand car instead of a new car.
As an attorney you'd know that surely.
Jeff
#27
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
2003 SL500, 74 Harley FL, 08 Yukon Denali
Unwind
Thought I'd pipe in here...
I used to sell cars and we would often have an 'Unwind' car, which was a car that someone had purchased at the dealership, but then a few days later we would find out that the bank did not buy their loan so the car needed to be returned.
They would usually have a couple hundred miles on them and we were told to tell the next buyer anything from the truth, to 'it was a test drive car at another dealership', blah, blah, blah.
Now, there was probably nothing wrong with the car, it's just the idea of you ordering a new car and being pushed into what is actually a used car. Even your trusted salesman may be telling you a white lie (or he may just be relaying what he was told) knowing that it's not a big deal.
I'm the most easy going guy around and I don't worry too much about little things, BUT even if it were me, I would insist on the new car unless there was a monetary benefit such as the gas tax covered, etc... There's just something about not getting exactly what you had expected and this definitely is not what you signed for.
Side Note: Their right, do not ever buy a used car from Texas. I have a good friend that is a (my) car broker and that is the first thing they check for. It's such a scam that some bad cars are re-registered in Texas and then sold out of there just to avoid any records, etc. It's a mess. Even cars that have been totalled have a clean title there.
Anyway, good luck with either car. Don't let them tell you why you can't get the car you want, 'it's sliver', 'it's got this package, that package', 'it's too popular'. If you have any problem, drop me an email and i'll have my broker find one for you. It'll take him 10 minutes to find one if it's out there. He's rock bottom works only off referals.
I used to sell cars and we would often have an 'Unwind' car, which was a car that someone had purchased at the dealership, but then a few days later we would find out that the bank did not buy their loan so the car needed to be returned.
They would usually have a couple hundred miles on them and we were told to tell the next buyer anything from the truth, to 'it was a test drive car at another dealership', blah, blah, blah.
Now, there was probably nothing wrong with the car, it's just the idea of you ordering a new car and being pushed into what is actually a used car. Even your trusted salesman may be telling you a white lie (or he may just be relaying what he was told) knowing that it's not a big deal.
I'm the most easy going guy around and I don't worry too much about little things, BUT even if it were me, I would insist on the new car unless there was a monetary benefit such as the gas tax covered, etc... There's just something about not getting exactly what you had expected and this definitely is not what you signed for.
Side Note: Their right, do not ever buy a used car from Texas. I have a good friend that is a (my) car broker and that is the first thing they check for. It's such a scam that some bad cars are re-registered in Texas and then sold out of there just to avoid any records, etc. It's a mess. Even cars that have been totalled have a clean title there.
Anyway, good luck with either car. Don't let them tell you why you can't get the car you want, 'it's sliver', 'it's got this package, that package', 'it's too popular'. If you have any problem, drop me an email and i'll have my broker find one for you. It'll take him 10 minutes to find one if it's out there. He's rock bottom works only off referals.
#28
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Memphis
Posts: 1,111
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SL500 and A-CLASS
Maybe the car had serious problems and they took it back. LovinSL600 had a engine problem with the first thousand miles.
The point is that they said you was getting a new car and it turn out to be used. I would be pist for them misleading you.
In TN that is a criminal act. We even have discloser laws to protect us. I purchased a used Mitsubishi Eclipse in 1999 with 50 miles on it. The dealer even told me it was used, and it was a better deal than a new Mitsubishi Eclipse. The owner decided to take it back and the dealer by TN law can only sell it as used.
The point is that they said you was getting a new car and it turn out to be used. I would be pist for them misleading you.
In TN that is a criminal act. We even have discloser laws to protect us. I purchased a used Mitsubishi Eclipse in 1999 with 50 miles on it. The dealer even told me it was used, and it was a better deal than a new Mitsubishi Eclipse. The owner decided to take it back and the dealer by TN law can only sell it as used.
#29
Thanks for all of the help. I heard from my salesman this morning. He said that when he pulled the car to write th VIN number for the contract, it showed as a new car. He did NOT try to push me to buy the used one but rather told me he was embarassed and that he would do a national search if necessary to get me the new car with the options that he had promised. After 20 years with him and seven cars, I had no problem giving him the benefit of the doubt. Now I wait and see what he finds.
#30
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 2000 ft over the Fl coast in a B-17
Posts: 5,824
Received 259 Likes
on
185 Posts
Sometimes auto manufactures buy back a problem car just before it goes to Lemon Law arbitration (especially if it knows the car has legitimate problems and they would lose the case anyway), this allows the manufacuter to: Make the customer happy albeit a little late. Prevent the car from being tagged a lemon, allowing normal resale. On the downside the new owner never has a clue the car was headed to lemon law arbitration and had significant issues. Always try and obtain service records when buying a used car. MB dealer's (at least my local dealer, Autohaus Pomp Bch, Fl) can now access complete service records no matter the dealer. Buyer beware!
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Exeter, CA USA
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2002 BMW 745Li Black/beige, 2006 SL600 Capri Blue/Black still on order
Originally Posted by jlr
Thanks for all of the help. I heard from my salesman this morning. He said that when he pulled the car to write th VIN number for the contract, it showed as a new car. He did NOT try to push me to buy the used one but rather told me he was embarassed and that he would do a national search if necessary to get me the new car with the options that he had promised. After 20 years with him and seven cars, I had no problem giving him the benefit of the doubt. Now I wait and see what he finds.
#32
It aint over till its over. Although my salesman has located the car and it is an exact duplicate of what my CONTRACT calls for, my salesman has yet to get the ok from his boss to sell me the car at the AGREED price reflected in my CONTRACT, because Mercedes Benz pulled the rebate money on the car after January 3, 2006. Of course my CONTRACT was before January 3, 2006, as was my 65,000 trade in taken by the dealer before January 3 as was my actual balance paid before January 3. The only thing that didn't happen was that they didn't deliver a "new"car as my CONTRACT specified. I will give this another 5 days before the lawyer's letter goes to the dealership. If I have to go that route, rest assured my former placid response will change radically and the words FRAUD, BAIT and SWITCH, and ATTORNEY GENERAL will be prominently displayed in my letter. Right now, they have my 65K trade and my 12,000 plus balance and I have NADA except for that little ole CONTRACT. Want to take bets on how qucikly I get the car after the letter. Just kidding--I leaked the foregoing tactic to my salesman and I suspect I will have my car before five days from now.
#34
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A bucket on wheels
Originally Posted by jlr
It aint over till its over. Although my salesman has located the car and it is an exact duplicate of what my CONTRACT calls for, my salesman has yet to get the ok from his boss to sell me the car at the AGREED price reflected in my CONTRACT, because Mercedes Benz pulled the rebate money on the car after January 3, 2006. Of course my CONTRACT was before January 3, 2006, as was my 65,000 trade in taken by the dealer before January 3 as was my actual balance paid before January 3. The only thing that didn't happen was that they didn't deliver a "new"car as my CONTRACT specified. I will give this another 5 days before the lawyer's letter goes to the dealership. If I have to go that route, rest assured my former placid response will change radically and the words FRAUD, BAIT and SWITCH, and ATTORNEY GENERAL will be prominently displayed in my letter. Right now, they have my 65K trade and my 12,000 plus balance and I have NADA except for that little ole CONTRACT. Want to take bets on how qucikly I get the car after the letter. Just kidding--I leaked the foregoing tactic to my salesman and I suspect I will have my car before five days from now.
#35
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by jlr
It aint over till its over. Although my salesman has located the car and it is an exact duplicate of what my CONTRACT calls for, my salesman has yet to get the ok from his boss to sell me the car at the AGREED price reflected in my CONTRACT, because Mercedes Benz pulled the rebate money on the car after January 3, 2006. Of course my CONTRACT was before January 3, 2006, as was my 65,000 trade in taken by the dealer before January 3 as was my actual balance paid before January 3. The only thing that didn't happen was that they didn't deliver a "new"car as my CONTRACT specified. I will give this another 5 days before the lawyer's letter goes to the dealership. If I have to go that route, rest assured my former placid response will change radically and the words FRAUD, BAIT and SWITCH, and ATTORNEY GENERAL will be prominently displayed in my letter. Right now, they have my 65K trade and my 12,000 plus balance and I have NADA except for that little ole CONTRACT. Want to take bets on how qucikly I get the car after the letter. Just kidding--I leaked the foregoing tactic to my salesman and I suspect I will have my car before five days from now.
I too suspect you will get your car.
#36
MBWorld Fanatic!
You'll get your car. They blew it and they'll eat the loss.
They have A LOT to lose trying to sell you a used car as new.
They have A LOT to lose trying to sell you a used car as new.
#37
Just got word. They folded. I am to pick up the new car on Friday. However, it does not have the bixenon option but they are making an appropriate reduction in the price. Is NOT having this option a dig deal? My CL 500 does not have these lights and I have no problems.
#38
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
2006 SL600, 2001 S500, 1996 SL320
Lights
I personally really like the lights and would rather not have a car without them. For the hassle factor, have them do a dealer install on them and forget the reduction in price.
Originally Posted by jlr
Just got word. They folded. I am to pick up the new car on Friday. However, it does not have the bixenon option but they are making an appropriate reduction in the price. Is NOT having this option a dig deal? My CL 500 does not have these lights and I have no problems.
#40
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bethesda,Md.
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bentley Arnage Red Label
I think that xenon is standard and bi-xenon is the addition of a xenon high beam. No big deal to me if that is what it is. I can count on one hand the number of times I used the high beams. Just another stupid option to make $$. Keyless go on the other hand would be a deal breaker for me.
#42
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 2000 ft over the Fl coast in a B-17
Posts: 5,824
Received 259 Likes
on
185 Posts
Originally Posted by jlr
Just got word. They folded. I am to pick up the new car on Friday. However, it does not have the bixenon option but they are making an appropriate reduction in the price. Is NOT having this option a dig deal? My CL 500 does not have these lights and I have no problems.
Last edited by RJC; 01-12-2006 at 08:47 PM.
#43
Yes on the apology. No on the reasonable explanation unless you believe their story that their new car inventory mistakenly listed as new a car that they knew they had to sell as used. I will have more details after I pick it up today. Funny thing though. Although my deal was struck as 20K off sticker, when I was advised that the bixenons were not available, they said they were reducing my price by what I determined to be the invoice price for the lights, not the sticker price for them. While the difference is less than $100 dollars, it just goes to show that the "slick" treatment never ends. I intend to bring it up today before I pick up the car-- just for fun.
#44
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2007 Porsche 997 GT3
Originally Posted by jlr
Yes on the apology. No on the reasonable explanation unless you believe their story that their new car inventory mistakenly listed as new a car that they knew they had to sell as used. I will have more details after I pick it up today. Funny thing though. Although my deal was struck as 20K off sticker, when I was advised that the bixenons were not available, they said they were reducing my price by what I determined to be the invoice price for the lights, not the sticker price for them. While the difference is less than $100 dollars, it just goes to show that the "slick" treatment never ends. I intend to bring it up today before I pick up the car-- just for fun.
way to stay sharp! Good luck and keep up the good work.
.
#45
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Memphis
Posts: 1,111
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SL500 and A-CLASS
Originally Posted by jlr
Yes on the apology. No on the reasonable explanation unless you believe their story that their new car inventory mistakenly listed as new a car that they knew they had to sell as used. I will have more details after I pick it up today. Funny thing though. Although my deal was struck as 20K off sticker, when I was advised that the bixenons were not available, they said they were reducing my price by what I determined to be the invoice price for the lights, not the sticker price for them. While the difference is less than $100 dollars, it just goes to show that the "slick" treatment never ends. I intend to bring it up today before I pick up the car-- just for fun.
#46
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 2000 ft over the Fl coast in a B-17
Posts: 5,824
Received 259 Likes
on
185 Posts
Originally Posted by jlr
it just goes to show that the "slick" treatment never ends. I intend to bring it up today before I pick up the car-- just for fun.
Enjoy the new car.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Central California Coast
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2004 SL55, 2005 E500 Wagon
Originally Posted by tiggerfink
$100 differance? The MBUSA website shows abount $780 option for bixenons.
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Central California Coast
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2004 SL55, 2005 E500 Wagon
Originally Posted by tiggerfink
I just cannot believe the markup.
Sounds about right to me.
Jim