SL/R230: Sl550








Trending Topics
), but the downside will be the jacked up cost. Upside, the 24V 5.0 Litre SL's (which are pretty quick themselves) will take a price hit, so start looking guys. Regards
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Josh 12: I'd also be concerned about the new engine and possible issues especially with MB's recent reputation.
What was the reason(s) for your buy back?

MB engines are SOLID. I've never heard of reliability issues with the engine.
The 2007 SL is still a R230 and apparently, quality issues have been fixed as I've heard good things from 2005-2006 owners.
Josh 12: I'd also be concerned about the new engine and possible issues especially with MB's recent reputation.
What was the reason(s) for your buy back?
Buy-back due to repeated problems, e.g., replacement of wiper assembly, gear shift, suspension hydraulics, instrument cluster, plethora of electric problems, etc. The car was a launch edition with 34K miles. MB was very agreeable, no attorney or mediator was needed, and no confrontation took place. I was very low key, but the real reason for the successful buy-back was the excellent relationship between MB and my dealership.




While I know Mercedes Benz is trying very hard to correct their problems, I have not seen any statistics that would support what you are saying.
If you have any hard evidence that would be great as I would love to see Mercedes Benz get back to where they were prior to 2000.
When I spoke to Mercedes Benz people that were talking about their quality improvement programs they told me it would take at least 2-3 years before these improvements would be seen in the cars coming off the line.
Remember, a lot of these improvements must come from their suppliers and that is not easy to effectuate.
.
Yes, I agree with you that quality improvements and changes in the supply-chain can be hit-and-miss and can take time to improve across a vast number of suppliers or supplied components. But do you really think that it is that vast a number of suppliers and/or components? And that we won't see some immediate improvement? Production engineering and re-engineering is so much more advanced these days than it was even 5 years ago....
Last edited by ClayJ; Jan 8, 2006 at 03:51 PM.
Last edited by RJC; Jan 8, 2006 at 09:05 PM.




Yes, I agree with you that quality improvements and changes in the supply-chain can be hit-and-miss and can take time to improve across a vast number of suppliers or supplied components. But do you really think that it is that vast a number of suppliers and/or components? And that we won't see some immediate improvement? Production engineering and re-engineering is so much more advanced these days than it was even 5 years ago....
You would be surprised at how much of this turn around is supplier dependent. When Schrempp took over he vowed publicly to reduce costs by taking them out of the supply chain. That is exactly what happened and the suppliers reacted with poor quality products.
It is not only going to take effort but money as well.
I am not sure if you remember the problem I had with my new 2005 SL600 and the engine failing. It was found that the engine kept stalling on start up because the fuel pump did not have enough capacity to consistently fill the engine with enough fuel on start up. Well, this didn't happen with all pumps but it did happen enough so that they had a replacement pump manufactured in late 2003. That pump was further replaced by yet another updated pump in early 2004 and yet again finally in November of 2004. My 2005 SL was produced in December of 2004.
The 3rd generation pump is what it took weeks to get after a lot of pushing in order to fix my car. When they took out the original pump in my one week old 2005 SL600 we found that the fuel pump that was in there was the original pump from early 2003. In other words they knew they had problems and had a new 3rd generation pump, however they were not willing to throw out their existing inventory of older defective pumps and take that loss so they were putting defective pumps from 2003 in brand new 2005 cars costing $145,000. That was a year ago.
Have they thrown the old pumps out yet? If they did that would be the right step toward quality improvement.
Anybody taking bets?
.
MB is having serious problems with certain late 2002 - early 2004 vehicles where radiators are failing internally and leaking coolant into the transmissions causing complete transmission failure. The "fix" requires a new radiator and complete transmission removal and replacement; not a cheap endeavor to say the least.
MB has been very well aware of this problem for over half a year and refuses to recall cars just within the effected VIN range and simply replace the radiators. MB would rather wait, roll the dice and hope more of these car fall out of warranty and relieve them of responsibility. In the interim, loyal MB customers are having transmissions fail and are forced to endure all the pain that goes with total transmission failure and another unscheduled major service visit to the local MB dealership; this in-turn causes even more bad blood between MB and its customers especially when the service dept informs them that it's a well known problem with the radiator but MB would have rather let it fail causing catastrophic transmission damage and all the grief that goes along with it. One would think...hope, that MB would do the right thing and replace the radiators and save the company many, many thousands of euros in unnecessary transmission replacements and the numerous hours of labor associated with it. The vendor Valeo, a major world wide supplier of automotive parts is to blame for the shoddy workmanship. I wonder if this too was part of all the Schrempp cost cutting? I also wonder what all the transmission failures will do for the already stellar[sic] customer satisfaction #'s MB has been able to achieve in the past few years.
Last edited by RJC; Jan 9, 2006 at 10:23 PM.
The best thing about driving any new S Class is that you cannot see the outside of the car from where you're sitting. What you can see though is all those people mouthing, "Look at that ugly car!".
Last edited by blueSL; Jan 10, 2006 at 01:09 AM.

I know you're passionate about MB quality issues due to your own experiences, and I know you'll be the first to inform us of better quality. I'm waiting to buy a SL55

While I know Mercedes Benz is trying very hard to correct their problems, I have not seen any statistics that would support what you are saying.
If you have any hard evidence that would be great as I would love to see Mercedes Benz get back to where they were prior to 2000.
When I spoke to Mercedes Benz people that were talking about their quality improvement programs they told me it would take at least 2-3 years before these improvements would be seen in the cars coming off the line.
Remember, a lot of these improvements must come from their suppliers and that is not easy to effectuate.
.





