SL-Class (R230) 2003 -- 2012: Discussion on the SL500, SL550, SL600

SL/R230: Jump start/electrics problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-15-2018, 12:26 PM
  #26  
Banned
 
bobterry99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, unfortunately
Posts: 1,982
Received 387 Likes on 306 Posts
'09 S600, (2) R129 300SLs, '03 SL500, '03 SL55
Originally Posted by Rudeney
...Does K57 cut in if the car is just sitting there and voltage drops below 10.8, or would it only cut in with the ignition on?
It would only cut-in the moment the key was switched from position 0 to position 1 and would de-energize if the engine is not started within 30 seconds.

Originally Posted by Rudeney
Proper jump starting or charging won't damage anything. I've probably jump-started at least 100 MBZ cars and not damaged a single one.
That's good to know, Rodney. Your record of success is extremely compelling.

There is one thing that is a bit odd to me. The owner's manual says to make the final connection between the batteries after the donor car's engine has been started. I would think voltage spikes would be less if all connections were made with the engine off. I googled articles on jump-starting, and all of them state to complete the battery connections before starting either engine. I can only surmise that it really doesn't matter either way...
Old 02-15-2018, 10:52 PM
  #27  
MBworld Guru
 
Rudeney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,783
Received 999 Likes on 868 Posts
NO LONGER ACTIVE
Originally Posted by bobterry99
It would only cut-in the moment the key was switched from position 0 to position 1 and would de-energize if the engine is not started within 30 seconds.
So, if the consumer battery is dead, and the starter battery is too weak to power anything, including the EIS, then is there a way to "boost" the consumer battery?

That's good to know, Rodney. Your record of success is extremely compelling.

There is one thing that is a bit odd to me. The owner's manual says to make the final connection between the batteries after the donor car's engine has been started. I would think voltage spikes would be less if all connections were made with the engine off. I googled articles on jump-starting, and all of them state to complete the battery connections before starting either engine. I can only surmise that it really doesn't matter either way...
The only reason I can think of for having the donor car started is that if the SL's battery has a dead cell(s) then it could draw down the donor batter to the point that it might not start its own engine. Honestly, if you just do a nice, smooth connection with the jumper cables and don't panic and "stutter" when you get that little spark, then there's little chance of spikes.
Old 02-18-2018, 04:49 PM
  #28  
Banned
 
bobterry99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, unfortunately
Posts: 1,982
Received 387 Likes on 306 Posts
'09 S600, (2) R129 300SLs, '03 SL500, '03 SL55
Originally Posted by Rudeney
So, if the consumer battery is dead, and the starter battery is too weak to power anything, including the EIS, then is there a way to "boost" the consumer battery?
The M-B training document states that the starter battery powers the starter motor armature and nothing else, but that is not true. The starter battery can also power the N82 vehicle power module. Therefore, in the case where both batteries are weak jumping from the starter battery can start the car.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SL/R230: Jump start/electrics problem



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 AM.