SL/R230: SL500 swerves when brakes applied
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
SL500 swerves when brakes applied
Hi all, a couple days ago I set off to drive home from work. The first time I applied the brakes, I felt an unsettled swerving motion from the rear end. I got out and checked to see if the lug nuts were lose (they weren't) or a tire was flat (they were all fine). Next I took the car up to about 30mph and hit the brakes. The car started to yaw around it vertical axis fairly violently - it even briefly threw an ESP message. After turning the ignition off and on again, the error message was cleared and did not re appear although the problem remained. I decided to limp the car home on side roads which gave me more time to try and get a feel for what's going on. The best way I can describe the feeling is that it's as if the brakes are only being applied to one side. However since This happens even at very low speeds I would be surprised if uneven braking (in the rear) would be enough to cause this.
Once home I ran a scan with STAR diagnostics. The SBC system shows no faults, nor were there any other remarkable codes - although in fairness I may just not be looking for the right thing. I also jacked up the car and did a visual inspection of the wheel - everything seems normal and tight.
I'm really just looking for some ideas for trouble shooting. Not sure where to start and wondering if anyone has ever experienced this?
Thanks,
Matt
Once home I ran a scan with STAR diagnostics. The SBC system shows no faults, nor were there any other remarkable codes - although in fairness I may just not be looking for the right thing. I also jacked up the car and did a visual inspection of the wheel - everything seems normal and tight.
I'm really just looking for some ideas for trouble shooting. Not sure where to start and wondering if anyone has ever experienced this?
Thanks,
Matt
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Found the problem
Well, I'm pretty sure I've identified the culprit: The rear passenger side lower control arm broke clean off. I'm not sure how this happened - I figure I would have noticed a hit violent enough to do that kind of damage. My best guess after talking to a neighbor who used to drive a tow truck for a living is that this was caused by someone using the control arm as tie down points on a flat deck or to winch the car onto a trailer. The part is thin and really light so it is obviously designed to only be strong in a specific direction. Anyway I just wanted to get back with a resolution>
Now for the follow up question: The part number on the LCA is R 2303520205, but when I search for it I get results for mid 2000s E-class cars. Obviously it's possible that the same part is used on both cars. I was wondering if anyone can confirm this part number for use on a 2003 SL500 or provide a link to a site where I can get a definitive answer before I order.
Thanks everyone for views and suggestions,
Cheers
Matt
#5
Senior Member
Glad you found the problem. That is the correct part number. If you're going used, this outfit in Florida has all 5 control arms on Ebay for $35 + $20 shipping = $50. Control Arm Set
And you'll need to get an alignment after installation.
And you'll need to get an alignment after installation.
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Thanks, I ended up ordering a Lemfoerder OEM unit from AutohausAZ. After seeing how thinly built they are, I would not personally trust a used one - especially after experiencing what happens to the cars handling when it breaks. I'm curious though as to why you would assume that an alignment needs to be done? Assuming the old and new parts have the same dimensions I don't see why. There is nothing adjustable about it, just two bolts.
#7
Senior Member
Thanks, I ended up ordering a Lemfoerder OEM unit from AutohausAZ. After seeing how thinly built they are, I would not personally trust a used one - especially after experiencing what happens to the cars handling when it breaks. I'm curious though as to why you would assume that an alignment needs to be done? Assuming the old and new parts have the same dimensions I don't see why. There is nothing adjustable about it, just two bolts.
If you take a look at the 1st of the 2 pics you posted, you can see just how far offset the portion that's still attached to the hub is from the natural trajectory of the remainder of the link.
Last edited by Aussiesuede; 05-06-2019 at 09:32 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by Aussiesuede:
Frederick NL (05-07-2019),
Mattleycrue76 (05-07-2019)
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Why did you decide to replace them? Any symptoms? Or just a preventive maintenance?
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Maryland, United States
Posts: 4,778
Received 1,725 Likes
on
1,278 Posts
2015 SL400 (M276 Turbo), 2014 C350 Sport (M276 NA), 2004 SL500 (M113), 2004 Audi TT225 (BEA)
Glad you found the problem. That is the correct part number. If you're going used, this outfit in Florida has all 5 control arms on Ebay for $35 + $20 shipping = $50. Control Arm Set
And you'll need to get an alignment after installation.
And you'll need to get an alignment after installation.
#10
Senior Member
During our rare big snow event here in Seattle back in March, a woman was hesitant to stop as she came to the crest of a hill for fear of losing traction, so she continued out into the road I was on and I had about a second to decide to either T-Bone her, or swerve to miss her and on a snow covered ice slick road, that sent me into a curb resulting in the rear wheel being bent under the car at about a 50 degree angle. Upon getting home, inspection showed that at the very least, the lower control arm was bent into a "L" shape. Since I couldn't be certain if any of the other links had been damaged just by visual inspection, I decided the best course of action was to purchase and replace all 5 links. Amazingly, all the bushings on the links I removed seemed to be in remarkably good condition, and when measured against their replacement, none other than the lower control arm seemed to be damaged. After getting everything back together, I noticed the same symptoms the OP described, then and upon closer inspection, I could see a crack on the subframe bracket holding the same link that was damaged on the OP's car- that's how I had an inkling that it might be the cause of the OP's swerving issue. So I had the subframe welded by a buddy and had him add in a couple of gussets for additional strength. When I finally get the car back home to Hawaii, I've a complete drivetrain and subframe that I'll be swapping over from my wrecked SL55, so I wanted to avoid replacing the subframe if I could help it.
#11
Senior Member
During our rare big snow event here in Seattle back in March, a woman was hesitant to stop as she came to the crest of a hill for fear of losing traction, so she continued out into the road I was on and I had about a second to decide to either T-Bone her, or swerve to miss her and on a snow covered ice slick road, that sent me into a curb resulting in the rear wheel being bent under the car at about a 50 degree angle. Upon getting home, inspection showed that at the very least, the lower control arm was bent into a "L" shape. Since I couldn't be certain if any of the other links had been damaged just by visual inspection, I decided the best course of action was to purchase and replace all 5 links. Amazingly, all the bushings on the links I removed seemed to be in remarkably good condition, and when measured against their replacement, none other than the lower control arm seemed to be damaged. After getting everything back together, I noticed the same symptoms the OP described, then and upon closer inspection, I could see a crack on the subframe bracket holding the same link that was damaged on the OP's car- that's how I had an inkling that it might be the cause of the OP's swerving issue. So I had the subframe welded by a buddy and had him add in a couple of gussets for additional strength. When I finally get the car back home to Hawaii, I've a complete drivetrain and subframe that I'll be swapping over from my wrecked SL55, so I wanted to avoid replacing the subframe if I could help it.
P.S. My SL was safely in the garage this winter, AWD only.
#12
Senior Member
The driver of the other car was in tears when she was explaining the situation to her husband, and as I'd suspected by her reaction I later found out they didn't have insurance. I could have filed an uninsured motorist claim, but instead tried to show a bit of compassion and let them pay for the parts and $200 for my sweat equity. Sadly this town is UBER expensive,and a lot of working folks are barely making it by every month, so 4 crappy hours of my time doing the repairs myself was a small price compared to the headache it would have caused their young family..
The following users liked this post:
Frederick NL (05-11-2019)
#13
Senior Member
The driver of the other car was in tears when she was explaining the situation to her husband, and as I'd suspected by her reaction I later found out they didn't have insurance. I could have filed an uninsured motorist claim, but instead tried to show a bit of compassion and let them pay for the parts and $200 for my sweat equity. Sadly this town is UBER expensive,and a lot of working folks are barely making it by every month, so 4 crappy hours of my time doing the repairs myself was a small price compared to the headache it would have caused their young family..
#14
MBworld Guru
Wow, here in Alabama, "uninsured motorist" only covers bodily injury. Damage to the car is covered by the collision policy. Also, if the other car does not make any physical contact with your car, then the other driver cannot be held at fault. So, even if a crazy person is trying to run you off the road and you do so to avoid a crash, the resulting damage is consider your fault - no matter what. I once had a guy pull out in front of me at 1mph on a 45mph highway. I swerved to miss him and crashed. He even told the police it was his fault for pulling out and offered to let his insurance cover it, but the police could only list him as a witness and his insurance said no since he was not "involved".
#15
Senior Member
Wow, here in Alabama, "uninsured motorist" only covers bodily injury. Damage to the car is covered by the collision policy. Also, if the other car does not make any physical contact with your car, then the other driver cannot be held at fault. So, even if a crazy person is trying to run you off the road and you do so to avoid a crash, the resulting damage is consider your fault - no matter what. I once had a guy pull out in front of me at 1mph on a 45mph highway. I swerved to miss him and crashed. He even told the police it was his fault for pulling out and offered to let his insurance cover it, but the police could only list him as a witness and his insurance said no since he was not "involved".
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,357
Received 223 Likes
on
191 Posts
2005 R 230 SL350 (M112 3.7). Sold the 1966 W113 230SL recently
My guess is that you would have steered away from doing harm, in a reflex. Sometimes our reflexes are kinder than our premeditated thoughts, like when it comes to avoiding injury.
The following users liked this post:
Mattleycrue76 (05-12-2019)