SL-Class (R230) 2003 -- 2012: Discussion on the SL500, SL550, SL600

SL/R230: Which scan tool is best for 2003 SL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-24-2019, 08:47 PM
  #126  
Banned
 
bobterry99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, unfortunately
Posts: 1,982
Received 387 Likes on 306 Posts
'09 S600, (2) R129 300SLs, '03 SL500, '03 SL55
Originally Posted by SLcharge
So, why don't we let the members have a say in this case, let them judge the 2 different products...
Two points.

First, I've already stated that Peter's product is fine. I even recommended it with the caveat that the buyer not be bothered by the exorbitant cost and his lack of scruples. Second, there are exactly two copies of the software I have to offer running on member's PCs. I doubt either member wants to enter into this fray and risk suffering Peter's wrath.

The crux of this discussion is this: is Chinese software "crap", or is it an incredible value that will do everything the owner of a 2003 SL500 requires of it?
bobterry99 is offline  
Old 12-24-2019, 10:20 PM
  #127  
Banned
 
bobterry99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, unfortunately
Posts: 1,982
Received 387 Likes on 306 Posts
'09 S600, (2) R129 300SLs, '03 SL500, '03 SL55
Originally Posted by bobterry99
As I indicated in post #26, in offering software I am acting as the resource of last resort for someone wanting to put together the Holy Grail of a C3 multiplexer, Dell laptop, and software pre-configured for the Dell at a minimal cost. That is the setup I have been recommending for the past three years, and lately I have not been able to identify a vendor for the software.
.
I thought of two ways that enable me to provide software without the hassle of using the post office, so instead of charging $20 for the software I can provide it for free.

If someone sends me a 120GB thumb drive I will return it with the SDS software installed. The thumb drive will be a backup of my Dell. When the member receives the drive they simply boot up their Dell off of the thumb drive with a blank 120GB hard drive installed. Following the prompts the SDS software will be written to the hard drive.

Another method would be to mail me the blank 120GB drive that will go into the Dell and include a padded envelope with the return postage prepaid. The envelope must be small enough to fit into a standard residential mailbox.

My preference is the thumb drive method.

EDIT: I want to check with MBWorld after the holidays to ensure I am not violating any terms of use with this offer. Pending that outcome, software will be available after the new year.
.

Last edited by bobterry99; 12-26-2019 at 07:25 AM.
bobterry99 is offline  
Old 12-25-2019, 10:03 PM
  #128  
Member

 
JamesMitchell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 128
Received 109 Likes on 54 Posts
'07 S65 '05 SL65 '07 GL450 '03 SL55 (sold)
Bobterry99 and Rudeney Reported to Moderators for Abuse

Forum Members,

I have reported Bobterry99 and Rudeney to senior moderators for their abuse on this forum. I've detailed my findings in this post: https://mbworld.org/forums/sl-class-...-pmercury.html

I've had it with Bobterry99's and Rudeney's abusive comments to a number of our forum members in this thread. Bobterry99 continued his abusive behavior in the new thread I posted above. Their demeanor and writings are unbecoming of decent behavior on our forums. Moderators, please remove Bobterry99 and Rudeney from Mbworld for violations to Mbworld's rules.

Best,
James
JamesMitchell is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by JamesMitchell:
cyberdyne (12-26-2019), Geo3 (12-26-2019)
Old 12-25-2019, 11:40 PM
  #129  
Member
 
ray0214's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Nashville Tn
Posts: 152
Received 36 Likes on 22 Posts
2011 mercedes sl550, 1995 corvette
You are a vindictive idiot!! Rudeny has provided far more free tips, info etc than any other member in this forum. Until on mercury started this thing I have never seen him post anything negative. He has always been supportive.
ray0214 is offline  
The following 9 users liked this post by ray0214:
alk247 (12-26-2019), Bhopkins (01-11-2020), bobterry99 (12-26-2019), chad500sl (12-26-2019), ctravis595 (12-26-2019), danmm7 (12-26-2019), Dave3359 (12-26-2019), KennyK (12-26-2019), Leej (12-26-2019) and 4 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 12-26-2019, 02:50 AM
  #130  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ctravis595's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,239
Received 157 Likes on 136 Posts
2002 CL500 to CL55 conversion
Originally Posted by pmercury
You might have a low opinion of my intellect, but at least I have one, which I doubt you have at all. Your childish comments on my maturity and character, is below my dignity to comment on. Desperate people often chose radical measures to defend them self’s and disguise their lack of knowledge. Your persistent defense of an outdated technology, lead me to doubt your capabilities, and insight. If any of us is blurring the picture, and trying to persuade people to chose wrongly, it is definitely you.
I will gladly avoid to address you in the future, given that you stop blurring the picture, and start act professional, instead like an amateur.

testimonies are the best judge, not one person
did bro really just make a second account to like his own post? thats like high fiving yourself
ctravis595 is offline  
Old 12-26-2019, 02:52 AM
  #131  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ctravis595's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,239
Received 157 Likes on 136 Posts
2002 CL500 to CL55 conversion
Originally Posted by JamesMitchell
Forum Members,

I have reported Bobterry99 and Rudeney to senior moderators for their abuse on this forum. I've detailed my findings in this post: https://mbworld.org/forums/sl-class-...-pmercury.html

I've had it with Bobterry99's and Rudeney's abusive comments to a number of our forum members in this thread. Bobterry99 continued his abusive behavior in the new thread I posted above. Their demeanor and writings are unbecoming of decent behavior on our forums. Moderators, please remove Bobterry99 and Rudeney from Mbworld for violations to Mbworld's rules.

Best,
James
what comes around goes around i guess, ive seen too many nasty comments from pmercury for this not to be a suitable response


Originally Posted by danmm7
I totally understand the genuine Windows part and the issues with the cracked/hacked Chinese versions of Windows.

However, i am still not clear how the Mercedes software is any different/better?
You say that there is "no crack" used, yet you reference "custom designed keygens".
Who created these keygens? Are the Chinese using better/worse/same keygens?

At the end of the day, it sounds to me, both options come with cracked software. Perhaps, one version uses better crack? Maybe i am missing something.
im not really seeing the difference either. some may be thrilled with their $800 mercedes diagnostic setup from pmercury, but intellectual property is no joke and it seems you're taking a legal gamble here. we've all heard about the teenage kid or grandma who was heavily prosecuted for stealing $10 movies or $1 songs...i do not recommend toying with a company such as mercedes over fake $10k diagnostic setups... especially with someone who causes as much turbulence as pmercury. i would tread lightly. perhaps its only a matter of time until these fake versions stop working? or worse, law enforcement is knocking on the door

Originally Posted by bobterry99
To keep my posts brief I passed over some points. I revisit what pmercury wrote to danmm7:
I could be mistaken, but I am certain danmm7 does not have Bosch ME9.7 engine management; he probably has ME 2.8. You have no idea what firmwares are running throughout his vehicle.
im glad im not the only one who noticed this...

Last edited by ctravis595; 12-26-2019 at 03:24 AM.
ctravis595 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
bobterry99 (12-26-2019)
Old 12-26-2019, 06:01 AM
  #132  
Banned
 
bobterry99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, unfortunately
Posts: 1,982
Received 387 Likes on 306 Posts
'09 S600, (2) R129 300SLs, '03 SL500, '03 SL55
Originally Posted by ctravis595
did bro really just make a second account to like his own post?
Yes!

Pmercury boasts of a sterling reputation and cites the numerous "likes" he has received. His current total is 318. In the past week he gave 14 of them to himself with one of his now-banned accounts!

Did I mention he lacks sruples? {...Checking..} Yes, twice.
.

Last edited by bobterry99; 12-26-2019 at 08:53 AM.
bobterry99 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Bhopkins (01-11-2020)
Old 12-26-2019, 09:18 AM
  #133  
Banned
 
bobterry99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, unfortunately
Posts: 1,982
Received 387 Likes on 306 Posts
'09 S600, (2) R129 300SLs, '03 SL500, '03 SL55
The odds of pmercury being reinstated have gone from even money to a 15-1 long-shot.
bobterry99 is offline  
Old 12-26-2019, 09:48 AM
  #134  
Banned
 
bobterry99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, unfortunately
Posts: 1,982
Received 387 Likes on 306 Posts
'09 S600, (2) R129 300SLs, '03 SL500, '03 SL55
{In response to a pmercury post which the moderator has since deleted.}

Peter, this is what the moderator wrote:

"The banning of the pmercury account was an Administrative response to 'Non Registered Vending' concerning his commercial avatar and link to a website offering services. It had nothing to do with favoring one argument over another as I have very little wiggle room when a URL links to a commercial looking entity offering services. Additionally, when I followed the link the first time I received a trojan virus warning on my end, I banned the account immediately.

"Since then he has spammed the forums with multiple accounts using IP changers to announce how to contact him, all violations of our Terms of Service...

As an aside, I found trojan viruses in two different programs I downloaded from your *******.com site.

.

Last edited by bobterry99; 12-26-2019 at 10:49 AM.
bobterry99 is offline  
Old 12-26-2019, 10:41 AM
  #135  
Banned
 
bobterry99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, unfortunately
Posts: 1,982
Received 387 Likes on 306 Posts
'09 S600, (2) R129 300SLs, '03 SL500, '03 SL55
Originally Posted by ctravis595
...some may be thrilled with their $800 mercedes diagnostic setup from pmercury, but intellectual property is no joke and it seems you're taking a legal gamble here. we've all heard about the teenage kid or grandma who was heavily prosecuted for stealing $10 movies or $1 songs...i do not recommend toying with a company such as mercedes over fake $10k diagnostic setups...
I think I got my software from a member of *******.com, though it might have been by way of a torrent. I do not know the provenance of the software, but I think it is very possible that my copy is in violation of copyright law. It follows that any copies I make are in violation as well, I suppose.

Mindful of this I don't know how I should go about making my software available to the forum. I welcome feedback either by PM or replies on this thread.
bobterry99 is offline  
Old 12-26-2019, 01:11 PM
  #136  
Member

 
JamesMitchell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 128
Received 109 Likes on 54 Posts
'07 S65 '05 SL65 '07 GL450 '03 SL55 (sold)
Such harsh name calling!

Originally Posted by ray0214
You are a vindictive idiot!! Rudeny has provided far more free tips, info etc than any other member in this forum. Until on mercury started this thing I have never seen him post anything negative. He has always been supportive.
Ray,
C'mon, man - couldn't you come up with some type of stronger language to name call me? Don't worry, I'm not taking your name calling personally. I prefer to call a spade a spade. It's just business. Just like good business for Rudeney. I can tell there's quite a following of folks who have been helped by Rudeney's helpful posts. I'm not disagreeing with that. The premise of what I am disagreeing with is based on Rudeney's own words as to why pmercury was banned. But first, let's read Rudeney's own words as he details how he had (as of yesterday) a link in signature block that linked to his diagnostic and repair services business: "I see you (pmercury) have accused me of advertising on the forum. If you read the link in my signature, there is NOTHING there for sale..You have mentioned that I also "advertise" in my signature block. Yes, I do have a link in my signature block that is on my company website, Benzbits. If you go poking around on other pages on that site, you may discover that Benzbits is a part of a for-profit business...Now, having said all that, I have had several (maybe around 8-10) forum members contact me for help through my Benzbits business and come to see me here in Alabama. In all cases - even one who had recently joined and never even posted - I NEVER charged anything for my services." Okay, so Rudeney had forum members actually visit him at his shop in Alabama, but he "NEVER" charged anything for his services. He or his techs actually spend time with diagnostic equipment on forum members cars, and then when the services are complete Rodney simply doesn't charge anything? He also offers convertible top repair. My convertible top needs work. I should plan a trip to Alabama and get the mbworld free convertible top repair special. What specific services does he offer? They are here: http://benzbits.com/web/diagnostics.html and here: http://benzbits.com/web/repairs.html and here: http://benzbits.com/web/other.html

Now, there is a follow on post by Rudeney that details the two reasons why pmercury was banned: "One, he was being very argumentative and making unsubstantiated claims that his version of the SDS software was better. Second, he was clearly violating forum rules by advertising for-profit services without paying to be a forum sponsor." But wait, he's never made any money by having the benzbits.com link in his signature... Yeah, right. With 10,600+ posts with the benzbits.com link in the signature and not being an approved vendor, Rudeney has also violated the mbworld rules that he accused pmercury of violating. Just calling a spade a spade. But what do I know? You haven't seen me around the R230 forum before. Well, I'm just a person who has driven my 2007 Mercedes for the past 195K miles since new. I've contributed to the X164 forum in the past. But now that I have a new to me SL55, I think I'll stick around here for a while. Thanks again, Ray, for the name calling. The truth only hurts if it should.

Best,
James

Last edited by JamesMitchell; 12-26-2019 at 01:19 PM. Reason: spelling
JamesMitchell is offline  
The following users liked this post:
PrecisionEngine (12-26-2019)
Old 12-26-2019, 01:56 PM
  #137  
Member
 
PrecisionEngine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 107
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
'06 SL65
Originally Posted by JamesMitchell
Ray,

Now, there is a follow on post by Rudeney that details the two reasons why pmercury was banned: "One, he was being very argumentative and making unsubstantiated claims that his version of the SDS software was better. Second, he was clearly violating forum rules by advertising for-profit services without paying to be a forum sponsor." But wait, he's never made any money by having the benzbits.com link in his signature... Yeah, right. With 10,600+ posts with the benzbits.com link in the signature and not being an approved vendor, Rudeney has also violated the mbworld rules that he accused pmercury of violating. Just calling a spade a spade. But what do I know? You haven't seen me around the R230 forum before. Well, I'm just a person who has driven my 2007 Mercedes for the past 195K miles since new. I've contributed to the X164 forum in the past. But now that I have a new to me SL55, I think I'll stick around here for a while. Thanks again, Ray, for the name calling. The truth only hurts if it should.

Best,
James
I don't have much to say besides that this forum has removed a valuable contributor for a violation of the rules which he is not the only one guilty of. There are plenty of forum members who have received monetary benefit without being vendors. People come to this forum for help diagnosing their vehicles or enhancing their vehicles performance. These vehicles are a very niche market, which benefit from folks who are deeply in touch with their inner workings. Folks like PMercury, Rudney, and many more leave a paper trail of their hard work and info behind. That information alone, brings thousands of others to this forum which are then bombarded by direct and indirect advertising of all different sorts. Therefore, banning folks like PMercury is only going to decrease the amount of traffic in this forum. the less the traffic, the less will be purchased, until the forum no longer exists.

Folks like PMercury and Rudney, if they make any monetary gain, are not in the business of selling auto services. Their fees, if any, are most likely to cover some of their overhead expenses when helping others. How many times has someone requested a part verification because they didnt want to pay the annual subscription cost? Someone paid for that subscription, like PMercury. Who then provides the information to the forum for free. I help dozens of people every year fixing their cars. I never ask for money, but I do ask them to cover my shop supplies like, anti-seize, rags, etc. What is so different of PMercury or Rudney of accepting some funds to cover their expenses?

Removing folks like Pmercury or Rudney is only going to reduce the amount of information shared on a platform which already starving for attention.

Happy Holidays and Happy New Year.
PrecisionEngine is offline  
The following users liked this post:
JamesMitchell (12-26-2019)
Old 12-26-2019, 02:08 PM
  #138  
Member

 
JamesMitchell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 128
Received 109 Likes on 54 Posts
'07 S65 '05 SL65 '07 GL450 '03 SL55 (sold)
Originally Posted by PrecisionEngine
I don't have much to say besides that this forum has removed a valuable contributor for a violation of the rules which he is not the only one guilty of. There are plenty of forum members who have received monetary benefit without being vendors. People come to this forum for help diagnosing their vehicles or enhancing their vehicles performance. These vehicles are a very niche market, which benefit from folks who are deeply in touch with their inner workings. Folks like PMercury, Rudney, and many more leave a paper trail of their hard work and info behind. That information alone, brings thousands of others to this forum which are then bombarded by direct and indirect advertising of all different sorts. Therefore, banning folks like PMercury is only going to decrease the amount of traffic in this forum. the less the traffic, the less will be purchased, until the forum no longer exists.

Folks like PMercury and Rudney, if they make any monetary gain, are not in the business of selling auto services. Their fees, if any, are most likely to cover some of their overhead expenses when helping others. How many times has someone requested a part verification because they didnt want to pay the annual subscription cost? Someone paid for that subscription, like PMercury. Who then provides the information to the forum for free. I help dozens of people every year fixing their cars. I never ask for money, but I do ask them to cover my shop supplies like, anti-seize, rags, etc. What is so different of PMercury or Rudney of accepting some funds to cover their expenses?

Removing folks like Pmercury or Rudney is only going to reduce the amount of information shared on a platform which already starving for attention.

Happy Holidays and Happy New Year.
Very well said! I can't agree more with your thoughts. I don't want to see Rudeney banned, as I also disagree with Pmercury being banned for many of the reasons you mentioned. But, as a newbie to the R230 forum, I found it extraordinarily contradictory that the very person (Rudeney) who supported Pmercury's banning, has also engaged in promoting his for-profit Mercedes business for many, many years. In reality, both Pmercury and Rudeney should be allowed to exist on this Mbworld forum for the benefit of thousands of MB owners. Personal jabs and/or name calling aside, I sincerely appreciate all who contribute to this forum. Owning a Mercedes is a journey - not a destination. Happy Holidays to all!

Best,
James
JamesMitchell is offline  
Old 12-26-2019, 03:51 PM
  #139  
Administrator Emeritus
 
speedlimit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,408
Received 462 Likes on 348 Posts
Thread is closed.

It's unbelievable that something so simple as a discussion of scanning tools devolved into this mess. Any additional threads on this topic will be removed without comment.

How about something positive? At least while you are all watching this 'thread' please consider voting for our MBworld December Car of the Month. We have 10 quality entries for you to choose from this month. Thank you!
https://mbworld.org/forums/december-...en-voting-254/



Bobf
speedlimit is offline  
The following 4 users liked this post by speedlimit:
Bhopkins (01-11-2020), chad500sl (12-27-2019), KennyK (12-26-2019), Leej (12-27-2019)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SL/R230: Which scan tool is best for 2003 SL



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:16 PM.