SL/R231: Did anyone here consider a Ferrari California T?
Without a doubt, the Ferrari is in a class by itself. I certainly loved it. There were three reasons, however, for why I did not buy it. The first, as it is for many others, was price. I could not justify spending $280,000 on a car when there are so many other (and, in my mind, better) uses for its cost differential. In a similar way, although less expensive than the California T, I reached the same conclusion regarding the Bentley. The second was inadequate use. The California T deserves to be driven by someone who exploits at least a majority of its potential. Using it nearly exclusively to pick up a prescription at the drug store, etc. is criminal, which is just about the only use I have for a car. (I live in Las Vegas and fly everywhere else; moreover, the environs are bereft of twisty mountain roads.) The third is that, at my age, driving a Ferrari would result in most people getting an erroneous impression of me. I am not trying to return to my youth nor do I seek to evidence my financial success.
And so, while test driving the Ferrari was a thrill I expect to always remember, I did not feel compelled to own it. As an aside, I found that the new Boxster S offers much of the same driving experience as the California T, albeit not all of that incredible acceleration and engine sound -- at a fraction of the Ferrari's price.
Without a doubt, the Ferrari is in a class by itself. I certainly loved it. There were three reasons, however, for why I did not buy it. The first, as it is for many others, was price. I could not justify spending $280,000 on a car when there are so many other (and, in my mind, better) uses for its cost differential. In a similar way, although less expensive than the California T, I reached the same conclusion regarding the Bentley. The second was inadequate use. The California T deserves to be driven by someone who exploits at least a majority of its potential. Using it nearly exclusively to pick up a prescription at the drug store, etc. is criminal, which is just about the only use I have for a car. (I live in Las Vegas and fly everywhere else; moreover, the environs are bereft of twisty mountain roads.) The third is that, at my age, driving a Ferrari would result in most people getting an erroneous impression of me. I am not trying to return to my youth nor do I seek to evidence my financial success.
And so, while test driving the Ferrari was a thrill I expect to always remember, I did not feel compelled to own it. As an aside, I found that the new Boxster S offers much of the same driving experience as the California T, albeit not all of that incredible acceleration and engine sound -- at a fraction of the Ferrari's price.
The folks at Ferrari of Newport Beach were kind enough to loan my wife and I a brand new (500 miles) California T this past Tuesday. When I asked them when they wanted it back, they said "a couple of hours, have fun!" So, we drove the car down Pacific Coast Highway to Dana Point for coffee. We did have fun and it is a great car, but my conclusions were similar to yours. In addition, I did not like the way the exhaust would suddenly ROAR, even with a very light foot on the throttle. As a matter of fact, I did not care for the sound of the exhaust at all. At low speeds it sounded like an old pick-up truck, but I will admit to loving the sound at speed. The bottom line was it just really doesn't suit our needs--or wants for that matter, but again, like you, I will never forget those two hours.
There are several things that I don't like about the current SL, but for the money, there is nothing that even comes close. I may pull the trigger on one soon. And, after driving both, I actually preferred the SL450. It felt so much lighter and fun to drive. I still might go for another test drive in a new Porsche Targa, but in the end, I'll probably come back to the SL, warts and all.
Last edited by Streamliner; Oct 14, 2016 at 08:42 PM.
The problem I have with the Cali is the appeal towards women and while secure in my masculinity, I wouldn't spend $225K+ for a car where the first thought of a passerby is, "that guy is driving his wife's car." That's just one of the reason's we are on our second SL550 in 3 years.
MB
The folks at Ferrari of Newport Beach were kind enough to loan my wife and I a brand new (500 miles) California T this past Tuesday. When I asked them when they wanted it back, they said "a couple of hours, have fun!" So, we drove the car down Pacific Coast Highway to Dana Point for coffee. We did have fun and it is a great car, but my conclusions were similar to yours. In addition, I did not like the way the exhaust would suddenly ROAR, even with a very light foot on the throttle. As a matter of fact, I did not care for the sound of the exhaust at all. At low speeds it sounded like an old pick-up truck, but I will admit to loving the sound at speed. The bottom line was it just really doesn't suit our needs--or wants for that matter, but again, like you, I will never forget those two hours.
There are several things that I don't like about the current SL, but for the money, there is nothing that even comes close. I may pull the trigger on one soon. And, after driving both, I actually preferred the SL450. It felt so much lighter and fun to drive. I still might go for another test drive in a new Porsche Targa, but in the end, I'll probably come back to the SL, warts and all.
Trending Topics

The Best of Mercedes & AMG








