SL/R231: Auxiliary Battery Malfunction


When charging from the manufacturer recommended points ( I’m pretty sure that the positive is a direct connection to the main battery (via the starter) anyway, as it is a jump starting point) the CTEK goes through all the phases as normal.
I do not understand the logic of wanting to connect directly to the cranking battery (except for some sort of convenience ........) when the manufacturer has provided charging points. However each to his own.
Actually, I was questioning how the CTek's "smarts" would interact with those of the SAM...and if, as suggested above, the SAM is somehow in parallel with the main battery, then it would not necessarily be bypassed from the aux battery's viewpoint.
My only concern regarding the SAM/CTek issue was this: if there is a SAM that watches and senses charging voltage/current, could it somehow be "freaked out" by the rather convoluted and sophisticated multi-step CTek charging regimen? The CTek goes through seven or eight different programs/steps, each of which has different voltage/current characteristics (square-wave, pulsing, more voltage with less current, less voltage with more current, etc.) depending on what the immediate needs of the battery are...which in itself suggests the CTek is continually doing its own evaluations on what to do and for how long on each of its steps on the way to "full" charge. Might not this whole process collide in some way with the evaluations taking place in the SAM? And if so, who wins and who loses? What does the CTek think if/when the SAM ostensibly switches the CTek's load from the main battery to the aux battery, and the CTek suddenly has to start all over again while running a "big battery" charge, only now into a small battery...and what does the SAM think when it's exposed to the CTek's various different charging profiles, etc.? Maybe I'm overthinking the whole thing and it just simply all works...IDK. You and I have been just fine connecting our CTeks under the hood. Our only difference is that, based on the documentation that I've seen here, I have assumed that my occasional long drives are all that is responsible for my aux battery's continued good health...whereas, you are satisfied that your under-hood charging is responsible for your aux battery's continuing good health. Understanding what is actually happening would be nice, but that's not really necessary for us to continue enjoying our fantastic cars, is it?
Last edited by Dr. Manhattan; Jan 21, 2022 at 03:31 PM.
I would suggest that these cumbersome tabs serve a purpose during manufacturing/assembly of the car, rather than a nefarious intent on the the part of MB. But, who knows....
FYI




The charger has 4 modes: small battery, normal battery, cold weather and recondition.
The normal battery mode says it is for wet, Ca, MF, GEL and many AGM batteries.
The cold weather mode says it is for charging at low temperatures described as -20 degrees C to +5 degrees C and for power AGM batteries like Optima and Odyssey.
My garage will rarely get below 10 degrees F and neither of my batteries are an Optima or Odyssey. The main battery is a Varta AGM and the auxiliary is made by FIAMM, I think it is also an AGM. Both are vented properly.
My question is: Should I use the Cold Weather mode during the winter months and the normal battery mode during the warmer months of the year? When I look at the chart that describes the various steps in the charging programs I do not see any difference in the charging voltages during the 7 stages of each program.
Any comments or recommendations? Thanks.
The charger has 4 modes: small battery, normal battery, cold weather and recondition.
The normal battery mode says it is for wet, Ca, MF, GEL and many AGM batteries.
The cold weather mode says it is for charging at low temperatures described as -20 degrees C to +5 degrees C and for power AGM batteries like Optima and Odyssey.
My garage will rarely get below 10 degrees F and neither of my batteries are an Optima or Odyssey. The main battery is a Varta AGM and the auxiliary is made by FIAMM, I think it is also an AGM. Both are vented properly.
My question is: Should I use the Cold Weather mode during the winter months and the normal battery mode during the warmer months of the year? When I look at the chart that describes the various steps in the charging programs I do not see any difference in the charging voltages during the 7 stages of each program.
Any comments or recommendations? Thanks.
No the winter mode is for AGM. Only use that. The algorithms for duration, voltage and current for AGM are different to regular lead acid batteries.(I actually emailed CTEK(about 5 years ago) to confirm this
Your battery will almost certainly be regular be AGM (Optima and Odyssey are a type of AGM but different construction) . I use the “winter/AGM mode” on mine & wife’s car all year round (5 years now) without any issues.
Last edited by rorywquin; Jan 27, 2022 at 06:34 AM.




The Best of Mercedes & AMG




I started getting an auxiliary battery warning a few months ago. Replaced it with an OEM battery with a 2021 date code. Date code on the old battery was 2014 so it was most probably the original one. I think the previous owner did use a maintainer on it because there was a CTEK pigtail attached directly to the auxiliary battery.
I'm still trying to confirm if you can maintain both batteries with one maintainer and if so where do you attach it.
Last edited by rmorin49; Jan 27, 2022 at 10:21 AM.




I started getting an auxiliary battery warning a few months ago. Replaced it with an OEM battery with a 2021 date code. Date code on the old battery was 2014 so it was most probably the original one. I think the previous owner did use a maintainer on it because there was a CTEK pigtail attached directly to the auxiliary battery.
I'm still trying to confirm if you can maintain both batteries with one maintainer and if so where do you attach it.




1) Car has been on the CTEK via the jump start posts for the month.
2) When I drove off the ECO light was orange (I put it down to taking the car out the garage last week) but changed to green within about 5 minutes. (FWIW I fitted a SmartTop which has a function to disable the ECO so it does not get used by me).
3) Usually if the car has not been left on the charger, it would take at least an hour of driving before ECO turns green.
My conclusion:
1) Charging as recommended by MB at the jump start points is fully effective - In 5 years of low usage ownership (low mileage - 17k) & using the jump start posts to maintain the battery / batteries I’ve had no problems with the car
2) I don’t know for certain if the AUX battery is getting charged or not, but it certainly is not detrimental to the AUX battery.
3) There is no benefit charging connected directly to the battery in the boot/trunk
4) I see no need for wiring pigtails to the AUX and charging it separately. These are VRLA batteries & are used extensively in applications where low maintenance batteries are needed.
Last edited by rorywquin; Feb 12, 2022 at 05:14 AM.


I believe you were going to check the charge on the AUX battery via the pigtail to confirm that the charger connection to the trunk battery does charge the AUX.
Have you performed the test?
We all want to know results.
Tx






1)Check V @ the AUX battery pigtail with charger connected
wait a day with charger disconnected
2)Check again with charger disconnected
With charger connected vs disconnected should see some difference.
Let us know
Tx










You plan sounds good.
Look forward to your results so we can put this question to rest.
although.............only way to really see if trunk connection better, same or worse that connecting to the engine jump start location is to:
1) Have your trunk mounted connection results
then
2)Try same scheme you used for the trunk connection connecting your charger to the underhood charging locations and then testing at the Aux connection
Comparing 1 & 2 really only way to close this question out.
Really only way to see if either or both methods provided charging to the aux






