SL/R232: SL63 test drive
As written before the new SL63 is far away from the previous SLs, and much more an improved AMG GT (Roadster). Similar seating position/height, steering, engine response, etc. It is more comfortable though, better suspension, more tech on board, so imho much better for daily usage then the AMG GT (Roadster). Great exhaust sound and gearbox, (MCT-9). It handles very good, and does not feel so heavy as it really is. Probably only real track drivers will feel the difference, but for every day usage, the SL63 is the better choice (over an AMG GT Roadster) imho. On the highway it is also a great car (you go 265 kmh in a flash), more relaxed than an AMG GT (Roadster) but less (more nervous) than the previous SL, let alone my current car...........
Stepping into my current car made something else clear right away: the build quality and materials of the SL63 are ok, but not acceptable at this price point. It is on par with a full option Z4 or a Boxster, but certainly not for a € 260K car (same price as my current car). Real pity the S coupe/cabrio will not be built again, since it gives the perfect mix of performance and comfort imho.
I agree that new MB models lack the quality materials of previous high line models. Some fanboys might chime in and say the new models are better finished buy I don't buy it.




I assume you had a chance to drive it top down? Did you have the windscreen installed? The old SL was excellent with wind buffeting and driving top down at speed. So is our GTC roadster but the S560 S-Class cab we drove in Germany less so. Even with the Air Cap/wind screen, there was just too much wind in the cabin. This is our primary concern with the rear seats and the clumsy windscreen.
Also agree on the interior materials. Does not feel it belongs to that price range...
As written before the new SL63 is far away from the previous SLs, and much more an improved AMG GT (Roadster). Similar seating position/height, steering, engine response, etc. It is more comfortable though, better suspension, more tech on board, so imho much better for daily usage then the AMG GT (Roadster). Great exhaust sound and gearbox, (MCT-9). It handles very good, and does not feel so heavy as it really is. Probably only real track drivers will feel the difference, but for every day usage, the SL63 is the better choice (over an AMG GT Roadster) imho. On the highway it is also a great car (you go 265 kmh in a flash), more relaxed than an AMG GT (Roadster) but less (more nervous) than the previous SL, let alone my current car...........
Stepping into my current car made something else clear right away: the build quality and materials of the SL63 are ok, but not acceptable at this price point. It is on par with a full option Z4 or a Boxster, but certainly not for a € 260K car (same price as my current car). Real pity the S coupe/cabrio will not be built again, since it gives the perfect mix of performance and comfort imho.
Quite disconcerting to hear your comp about the new SL63’s build quality and associated materials to a BMW Z4, but are you comparing it to your S’s and the exclusive interior, which I had in both of mine and makes a huge difference, and is due to be out soon for the SL's from what I hear.
Last edited by RJC; Aug 16, 2022 at 12:45 AM.




Last edited by Wolfman; Aug 16, 2022 at 11:49 AM.
Trending Topics
I assume you had a chance to drive it top down? Did you have the windscreen installed? The old SL was excellent with wind buffeting and driving top down at speed. So is our GTC roadster but the S560 S-Class cab we drove in Germany less so. Even with the Air Cap/wind screen, there was just too much wind in the cabin. This is our primary concern with the rear seats and the clumsy windscreen.
Also agree on the interior materials. Does not feel it belongs to that price range...
In my previous S cabrio (pre facelift) the lack of good windscreen was noticeable (the electric screen and air cap just help a little bit, but are more for show). My current (facelift) S cabrio however, has the additional windscreen behind the front seats, and that works very good (same as in the SL).
Quite disconcerting to hear your comp about the new SL63’s build quality and associated materials to a BMW Z4, but are you comparing it to your S’s and the exclusive interior, which I had in both of mine and makes a huge difference, and is due to be out soon for the SL's from what I hear.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




In my previous S cabrio (pre facelift) the lack of good windscreen was noticeable (the electric screen and air cap just help a little bit, but are more for show). My current (facelift) S cabrio however, has the additional windscreen behind the front seats, and that works very good (same as in the SL).
If so, that would be a bit disappointing for me as the old R231 SL and GT is better top down than the cab, including the facelift model. There is a fair amount of wind coming into the cabriolet even with the air cap and windscreen. Thanks again for your feedback!
If so, that would be a bit disappointing for me as the old R231 SL and GT is better top down than the cab, including the facelift model. There is a fair amount of wind coming into the cabriolet even with the air cap and windscreen. Thanks again for your feedback!




I didn’t drive one but I’ll add my .02. My family and I stopped and looked at a SL63 in all black with I think the performance trim. It had the carbon fiber interior also. It was sitting on the show room floor and we got to go all over it with the top up and down but never actually started the vehicle either. My wife and I both had similar impressions after our visit. (The car is for sale and not someone’s order)
The exterior is nice but at the $200k price point it just doesn’t have any pizzazz. It might just be the all black but we didn’t walk in and our mouths drop open. The spoiler as up on the rear and it looks a little high and out of place too. And come on MB can’t you make the area under the spoiler when it’s up look a little better than cheap plastic. Again, the exterior is cool, but we just didn’t see $200k.
Now the interior. Where do I start. Yes the trunk is small but it did appear deep. The back seat that we really wanted/needed was almost straight up. My daughter looked uncomfortable and she said it was one of the worst back seats we had tried out. I know very few of other members care about this, but we do. I also did not see cup holders back there unless I missed them. Just a thought. The front also felt very tight and small with very little space for your Starbucks coffees either. Although they did feel comfortable for the time we sat in them. I imagine it would not be bad up there for a long drive. Now the worst part, the over all lack of nappa or some type of seat design is just horrible. The plain black seats just looked like some type of cheap leatherette. It needs something here bad. As for some good, the graphics of the initial screen (no start up) was very crisp and nice although we saw very little here. I thought I would not like the fabric top but it actually looked good and was faster than I thought.
So needless to say, I’m calling this week and getting off the list for now. Although we were only looking at the SL55 and would probably be in at about $160k, we just didn’t see it at that price either. Again just my thoughts on a $145-200k car and I might have to do with the car having too much black with no accents. So we will keep looking.
Good luck.
I didn’t drive one but I’ll add my .02. My family and I stopped and looked at a SL63 in all black with I think the performance trim. It had the carbon fiber interior also. It was sitting on the show room floor and we got to go all over it with the top up and down but never actually started the vehicle either. My wife and I both had similar impressions after our visit. (The car is for sale and not someone’s order)
The exterior is nice but at the $200k price point it just doesn’t have any pizzazz. It might just be the all black but we didn’t walk in and our mouths drop open. The spoiler as up on the rear and it looks a little high and out of place too. And come on MB can’t you make the area under the spoiler when it’s up look a little better than cheap plastic. Again, the exterior is cool, but we just didn’t see $200k.
Now the interior. Where do I start. Yes the trunk is small but it did appear deep. The back seat that we really wanted/needed was almost straight up. My daughter looked uncomfortable and she said it was one of the worst back seats we had tried out. I know very few of other members care about this, but we do. I also did not see cup holders back there unless I missed them. Just a thought. The front also felt very tight and small with very little space for your Starbucks coffees either. Although they did feel comfortable for the time we sat in them. I imagine it would not be bad up there for a long drive. Now the worst part, the over all lack of nappa or some type of seat design is just horrible. The plain black seats just looked like some type of cheap leatherette. It needs something here bad. As for some good, the graphics of the initial screen (no start up) was very crisp and nice although we saw very little here. I thought I would not like the fabric top but it actually looked good and was faster than I thought.
So needless to say, I’m calling this week and getting off the list for now. Although we were only looking at the SL55 and would probably be in at about $160k, we just didn’t see it at that price either. Again just my thoughts on a $145-200k car and I might have to do with the car having too much black with no accents. So we will keep looking.
Good luck.
I didn’t drive one but I’ll add my .02. My family and I stopped and looked at a SL63 in all black with I think the performance trim. It had the carbon fiber interior also. It was sitting on the show room floor and we got to go all over it with the top up and down but never actually started the vehicle either. My wife and I both had similar impressions after our visit. (The car is for sale and not someone’s order)
The exterior is nice but at the $200k price point it just doesn’t have any pizzazz. It might just be the all black but we didn’t walk in and our mouths drop open. The spoiler as up on the rear and it looks a little high and out of place too. And come on MB can’t you make the area under the spoiler when it’s up look a little better than cheap plastic. Again, the exterior is cool, but we just didn’t see $200k.
Now the interior. Where do I start. Yes the trunk is small but it did appear deep. The back seat that we really wanted/needed was almost straight up. My daughter looked uncomfortable and she said it was one of the worst back seats we had tried out. I know very few of other members care about this, but we do. I also did not see cup holders back there unless I missed them. Just a thought. The front also felt very tight and small with very little space for your Starbucks coffees either. Although they did feel comfortable for the time we sat in them. I imagine it would not be bad up there for a long drive. Now the worst part, the over all lack of nappa or some type of seat design is just horrible. The plain black seats just looked like some type of cheap leatherette. It needs something here bad. As for some good, the graphics of the initial screen (no start up) was very crisp and nice although we saw very little here. I thought I would not like the fabric top but it actually looked good and was faster than I thought.
So needless to say, I’m calling this week and getting off the list for now. Although we were only looking at the SL55 and would probably be in at about $160k, we just didn’t see it at that price either. Again just my thoughts on a $145-200k car and I might have to do with the car having too much black with no accents. So we will keep looking.
Good luck.




As far as the BMW... I have never owned one for a day to day assessment. I have some friends with them and I have ridden in several and driven several. We have shopped them. I have never liked the firmness of their ride. It gets very old after a few hours.
The E-Cab looks great and rides and handles great and has a medium to good back seat. The price is also not bad at all. I bet this coming year is the last year for it though.
Last edited by Panama; Aug 22, 2022 at 01:00 PM.




Thanks for giving me an excuse to post a picture of my E-cab. Dark gray, gray leather. Only downside is I was hit up for every parade in town. This shot is me driving my daughter who was homecoming queen that year. 2018 I believe. Thanks for allowing me to indulge...



