SL/R232: Save $100,000: Get a CLE63 instead of a new SL








We are all entitled to our opinions, and I agree with you that the fwd ****boxes are not really Mercedes-Benz vehicles. However the C class is absolutely deserving of its badge. It’s often overlooked, but even in its early history, it was the best car in its class one way or another. With the first C class came an extremely well built car with a chassis that could survive a roll over with out killing the occupants, and multi-link rear suspension, a first for its class. Compare that to the 3er of that time. It was a car that pancaked its roof on roll over, and was all over the road with its semi-rear-trailing arm setup. Sure it may have been the more fun car to drive with an easy rear end to get sliding, but the C class was built and engineered to a much higher standard, one befitting of the badge. The roll of the C class isn’t to be a baby S class like so many want it to be. It may look like one, but its purpose also lies in creating a fun and dynamic car for those like me, the complete opposite of an S class. All that being said, if I had 150k laying around that I could spend on a car, I’d walk into the MB dealer and keeping walking by all the S580s until I get to the SL55’s. Unlike many, I love the new W223s, but they aren’t my type of car, the new SL absolutely is though.
Last edited by AzurSL; Apr 12, 2023 at 04:22 PM.
We are all entitled to our opinions, and I agree with you that the fwd ****boxes are not really Mercedes-Benz vehicles. However the C class is absolutely deserving of its badge. It’s often overlooked, but even in its early history, it was the best car in its class one way or another. With the first C class came an extremely well built car with a chassis that could survive a roll over with out killing the occupants, and multi-link rear suspension, a first for its class. Compare that to the 3er of that time. It was a car that pancaked its roof on roll over, and was all over the road with its semi-rear-trailing arm setup. Sure it may have been the more fun car to drive with an easy rear end to get sliding, but the C class was built and engineered to a much higher standard, one befitting of the badge. The roll of the C class isn’t to be a baby S class like so many want it to be. It may look like one, but its purpose also lies in creating a fun and dynamic car for those like me, the complete opposite of an S class. All that being said, if I had 150k laying around that I could spend on a car, I’d walk into the MB dealer and keeping walking by all the S580s until I get to the SL55’s. Unlike many, I love the new W223s, but they aren’t my type of car, the new SL absolutely is though.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




I sometimes kick myself for not having picked up a C43 with bucket seats. The day I went to collect my C300, they had a CPO C43 with the rare AMG performance seats. I didn’t even want to look at C43s because I heard horror stories about the insurance premiums. But that car with those seats sure did lure me away, until I called my insurance for a quote and they quoted me 3-4 times more than the c300. I just couldn’t justify it. Oh well, you live and you learn.
Last edited by AzurSL; Apr 13, 2023 at 03:03 AM.
I sometimes kick myself for not having picked up a C43 with bucket seats. The day I went to collect my C300, they had a CPO C43 with the rare AMG performance seats. I didn’t even want to look at C43s because I heard horror stories about the insurance premiums. But that car with those seats sure did lure me away, until I called my insurance for a quote and they quoted me 3-4 times more than the c300. I just couldn’t justify it. Oh well, you live and you learn.
Otherwise yup those brakes does well in the C 43, no surprise it did even better in the C 300.




When I was miserable as a toddler, I used to whine and groan about it. I didn't necessarily want resolution, I just wanted empathy and for people to see how miserable I was and feel my misery too. Since then I've grown up and realized that that's not effective nor pleasent.




Last edited by AzurSL; Apr 13, 2023 at 01:33 PM.
When I was miserable as a toddler, I used to whine and groan about it. I didn't necessarily want resolution, I just wanted empathy and for people to see how miserable I was and feel my misery too. Since then I've grown up and realized that that's not effective nor pleasent.
My most sincere apologies for causing you to feel that there is anything less than acceptance, inclusion and love for you here. Just remember: You’re good enough, you’re smart enough and doggone it, people like you! Now, run right out and treat yourself to a nice, used C Class! I believe the audio system comes preloaded with Kumbaya, so you can sing along as you drive home.

My most sincere apologies for causing you to feel that there is anything less than acceptance, inclusion and love for you here. Just remember: You’re good enough, you’re smart enough and doggone it, people like you! Now, run right out and treat yourself to a nice, used C Class! I believe the audio system comes preloaded with Kumbaya, so you can sing along as you drive home.





But everybody will have a different take on this. This discussion here is pretty lightweight compared to opinions and what makes a “real” AMG for example yet you can all do this without getting personal.
Let’s stay on topic. Thanks
- lack of wind noise top down or up
- lack of wind turbulence around the side mirrors, windshield pillars & general chassis
- lack of wind tunnels within the cabin
- a minimal difference between top-up and top-down performance.
- good visibility top up & down (might seem obvious with a top down, but some cars have you sit too low/have door panels too high)
This is what I mean by outperforming in terms of convertible action. In terms of driving dynamics, the SL's chassis is of course not the best. The 911 would easily take that.
Sure, they're both convertibles, but they're not the same vehicle at all. Let's talk about a few differences
Chassis, platform and overall vehicule
- CLE shares platform with the new C class. SL shares platform chassis with the new GT. The SL chassis is lighter (less steel, more aluminum) more dynamic and etc
- SL has things like dynamic engine mounts and a different weight distribution
- SL is a convertible purpose build chassis and it shows through things like the impression of wind noise and etc. It outperformance any non dedicated chassis like the CLE, Turbo 911, M8 convertible, when it comes to convertible action
- SL weights 1.9k kg, while the CLe will not be under 2.3k kg (due to hybrid system + drop top)
Interior
- This is probably the most similar point, but the SL has a better quality material, more comfortable seats, an air scarf, a better audio system, mobile screen, massaging seats, etc.
Exterior
- SL is wider and longer.
- SL has a more aggressive design, with more flared wheel arches and bigger wheels (both diameter and width)
- SL sits lower
Powertrain:
- SL has a V8 dyno'ed at 620 HP. The I4 E performance powertrain is set at 670HP at Boost, 479 HP in other circumstances. This is important. Boost is not present at all times, which particularly affects city driving.
- Your day-to-day power-to-weight ratio is much better in the SL than the unboosted hybrid powertrain. Slugging around over two tons with an I4 is no joke.
- 0-60s. C63SE is marketed at 3.4 (CLE convertible will be the same due to similar weight), SL63 at 3.6. Reputable car testers have achieve 3.05 in the C63e and 3.1 in the SL63. The C63 is quicker in a launch, but not by anything noteworthy.
- Sound. This is pretty easy to compare. The new I4 hybrid powertrain has worst sound than even the I4 powertrain in the A45, CLA45 and etc. Although it's not officially said why (regulations?) it could be because of the electrically assisted turbo.
Handling & dynamics
- SL has better weight distribution & lighter weight
- The SL63 has a hydraulic suspension, while the I4 hybrid platform has the classic steel springs with adaptive dampers.
- The extra power at all times from the SL allows the 4matic+ system to more drastically have an effect on driving
- SL63 is more dynamic under all forms of driving, An example is seeing reviews of the SL vs the c63 on the track. The SL keeps it in there, threading the line between GT and Sports car. The C63e is seen understeering and losing grip, with your tires screaming at you in turns. As reviewers say, it's not doing it in a good way at all. It's a boat.
Pricing.
- SL starts at 180k in the USD, and the C63se is expected to start at around 95K. So you can bet the CLE will start at above 100k. Let's say 105k. You're actually looking at a 75k difference
So overall, you'll be paying 75k less for a car that doesn't look, perform, execute on the convertible job, ride, provides emotion and more as well. To me, the argument doesn't exist. The gap is too big.
Also people in this forum have been getting the SL 50k under MSRP... and also 2 model years earlier, so a CLE might be similar priced to an SL
We have had 3 brand new R231 SL’s; likely more than others here and I can recognize pros/cons of each platform.
I loved the practicality of the folding hardtop. This allowed us to drive the car throughout the year with snow tires. The Magic Sky was cool too. Both pluses for the design where we live.
Our GTC roadster on the other hand has been sitting in the garage for six months; we just drove it for the first time last week.
Yet that car puts a smile on my face that the old SL never did. So we take the cons with the overwhelming pros. I see the new SL in a similar fashion, lots to like with a couple compromises.
Not everyone feels that way and that is cool. I just suggest to keep the complaints in the R231 forum. No need to come over only to vent and trying to aggravate.
Now for the CLE63 being priced well below $100k is highly improbable if the car uses the ePerformance trim. The car sits above the C class and the new C63s starts at $85k and with options will be $100k as a sedan.
Am also surprised at the handling comments about the GTS. AMG improved the suspension for MY17 and the handling is superb IMO, partially due to its great steering and not having the engine on top of the front axle.
The longer wheel base does take some getting used to perhaps.
I heard we are getting the CLE450 instead of a 43 AMG
We might think this car is a replacement for the CLK but it also might not be.



