SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Why in the world would anyone get an SL55 over an SL600?
MB intended the SL600 to be the smooth riding high speed GT v. the SL55's sporty high speed GT. Sure you can turn the SL600 into a monster, but you can do that to a SL500 as well. If you're going to ask a question, expect people to answer it as it's asked.
~ Ian
Last edited by IanSL55; Dec 7, 2005 at 02:24 AM.
Now with the money you save on the SL55 you can Kleemann Stage 2 the car (with Kleemann's warranty) and get 580HP/780 lb-ft and blow by any 'chipped' SL600 out there.
~ Ian
Now with the money you save on the SL55 you can Kleemann Stage 2 the car (with Kleemann's warranty) and get 580HP/780 lb-ft and blow by any 'chipped' SL600 out there.
~ Ian
Further, unless you run nitro all the E55’s with the Kleemann upgrades that have the same engine as the SL55 but weight 400lbs less still do not achieve the same ¼ mile times and traps. It’s hard to beat the torque of the V12. RenntTech only measures the hp and ft-lbs in 3rd gear which is a conservative way to determine the actual numbers. For example, RennTech quoted on their test a torque of 810ft-lbs on one SL600. Tested by another shop they got a figure of 910ft-lbs. In either case you can’t go wrong.
Further, unless you run nitro all the E55’s with the Kleemann upgrades that have the same engine as the SL55 but weight 400lbs less still do not achieve the same ¼ mile times and traps. It’s hard to beat the torque of the V12. RenntTech only measures the hp and ft-lbs in 3rd gear which is a conservative way to determine the actual numbers. For example, RennTech quoted on their test a torque of 810ft-lbs on one SL600. Tested by another shop they got a figure of 910ft-lbs. In either case you can’t go wrong.
I'd also guess that w/out LSD all that extra HP and torque will be wasted. And in street driving (what 99.9% of drivers do 99.9% of the time), drag times are meaningless.
But I disgress. My point really isn't what car is going to be faster... The question basically is why would anyone choose the AMG over the V12. Not a chipped SL600... a stock one.
~ Ian
~ Ian
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Group 1
The SL AMG signals to people that you have choosen the sporty version, ( AMG trim, the sound from the exhaust, etc. ) and therfore are the sporty type, that you are the executive type, and that you live in the fast lane.
Group 2
The ordinary SL signals to people that you are on top of things, you are in charge, but that you are the more carm type.
Both cars SCREEAMS : WEEEEEALTHY
AMG is MB´s sport dept. They can´t be compared with aftermarked tuners like RennTech or Kleemann. RennTech and Kleemann, they appel to a limited mumber of MB owners, who want the extreme, and are willing to pay for it, so that they can live their dream on the strip, or elsewhere where they can show off their power.
Owners who choose modification done by aftermarked tuners, do belong into group 1, just that they are more extreme, and that they, dont want the ordinary power off the schelf, that the ordinary sporty type drives.
So when you choose a car, it is a matter of signals, nothing else. Who do want to be ? How do you want people to see you ?
How many percent of MB´s in the USA do you people think are in someway modified ? I doubt it is more than 10%
Last edited by SLcharger; Dec 7, 2005 at 03:50 PM.

the V12 badge on the side would be blurry and meaningless
What counts is the badge on the trunk. And SL55 has that little "AMG" badge
Actually I did consider the SL600, but it wasn't sporty enough for me at this stage of my life (late 30's)... and that extra 6 dimes in savings went right into new rims. That said, I could see myself behind the wheel of one in 10 or 15 years for sure.
RE SLcharger's evaluation. I agree again. I don't doubt the pedigree of the V12 version of the SL, however to me it's like a solid gold Rolex v. the same model in stainless steel. They both tell time, but they really are statements to where you are in your life.
Generally speaking, if I see a young guy in a 600, my first thought is it's probably his fathers.
~ Ian
~ Ian
I see you want to get the all-new 997 twin-turbo when it comes out, that's awesome
Do you know any stats/info on it? How much power? Any other interesting info on it, and why do you think it will be a much better car than your E55?
What do you think are some of the decisive elements of the new 997 TT that would make a Benz person choose it over an SL or CL 55 or 600? Or for that matter over an E or CLS 55, or the upcoming twin-turbo CL/SL/E/CLS 63?
It is called life expirience, if you look into my profile you will see that I am 50, and I think I have seen and heard my share in life.
Although I am 50 I drive an AMG, because I still feel young, and I am not ready to "carm down" yet.
IanSL55
Your point is well thought, my watch happens to be a Rolex Daytona, Stainless Steel, White dail, no gold.
~ Ian
There are definetly advantages to both.
The 55 with the blown V8 has a torque band that kicks in much sooner than the 600.
The 600 has more high end grunt (turbos).
It seems that when dynoed both make more power than rated.
My 600 made 533hp at the flywheel bone stock
An SL55 dynoed by my tuners made 519hp bone stock.
The differences are more pronounced when to comes to torque due to the differences in simple math 8 vs 12 There's no replacement for displacement!
To the average driver who does an occasional stop light drag race, both have more than enough power to get the job done.
I agree that the AMG body kit is the only way to go, it makes a night and day difference. I also agree with the quad exhaust thing too, I handled that my own way:

as well as the badges:

I already had the 996TT, so the super-sporty thirst was already quenched, I wanted luxury, but also knew about RennTech and knew that a modded 600 is one of the fastest cars on the road.
In the end I think it's all just a matter of preference.
What a great choice to have to make!!!
I'm thinking we'll look back on these days as one of those golden ages of motoring, with so many über cars from which to choose!
I'm thinking we'll look back on these days as one of those golden ages of motoring, with so many über cars from which to choose!
Right you are about the golden age. I thought it existed in the 60's, but that was nothing to compare to this era. It won't last forever, though. The government will step in and mess it up in due time. Enjoy it while it lasts.
I also like the 55 for everything but the straight-line acceleration advantage of the 600. I am leaning toward the AMG (white with berry leather and every option) with the 030 package and then maybe K3 mods. I don't think there will be a straight-line acceleration issue then.
I am seriously condidering to have mine done a K3. I have some problems everytime i try to toast the 911 turboes. It is alwayes nice with some extra power, it does give you some confidence. I can´t await to see the looks in the Porsche drivers face, when they start wondering what hit them.


