SL55 AMG, SL63 AMG, SL65 AMG (R230) 2002 - 2011 (2003 US for SL55 and 2004 for the SL65)

SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: BMW M6 vs SL55 AMG (Video) !

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 16, 2007 | 01:50 PM
  #101  
RussRamz's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Germany
BMW M6
Originally Posted by StealthAuto
I personally am not a fan of the M5/M6's.. I had an E60 M5 for a few months and was extremely dissatisfied with it to say the least.

They are not for everybody, that's for sure. The guy I raced in Sweden was an ex-E60 M5 owner too. His wife wasn't comfortable with the SMG and what she perceived to be as a lot of power. He bought an SL65 AMG and she drives it without complaint.

I enjoy the neck snapping shifts myself. I can't get enough of it, but for some--it's unacceptable. That's cool.

BTW, The Merc guy I met is very classy and friendly. We became friends even though we were competing against each other. I wish we could all enjoy our love of cars, send congrats to the victors, sympathy to the losers, and share drinks without having to resort to the typical "Yea, I smoked that POS (insert car you hate here)!"
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2007 | 05:02 PM
  #102  
NSM's Avatar
NSM
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, California
SL65
Well said...
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 09:14 AM
  #103  
SoCalJD's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by StealthAuto
I personally am not a fan of the M5/M6's.. I had an E60 M5 for a few months and was extremely dissatisfied with it to say the least.
<<<

Not a fan of the E-60's either. For E-60$, I'd do the Dinan S3 package (621hp) to my E-39.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2008 | 06:09 PM
  #104  
yaroslav's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 176
Likes: 1
From: Odessa,Ukraine
GL550 , CL6.3 AMG
Thats we should to compare or with SL63
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNzuI...eature=related
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2008 | 09:42 PM
  #105  
Addicted2Speed's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 1
From: Miami, FL
Lotus Elise SLK55
The OP should've bought an SL600. With an ecu tune, no M5/M6 would keep up with 600hp+ V12 bi-turbo
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2008 | 05:51 PM
  #106  
alx's Avatar
alx
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,268
Likes: 253
the sl55 is slower than the m5 and the m6. i've driven extensively the sl55 and sl65 and i've owned an m5. this has been my experience from both sides of the fence.

from a dig the sl55 is even or even faster than the m5/m6 to about 60-80. once above that speed the big m cars start to pull. around town the sl55 is faster just because it takes the driver out of the equation while the peaky m5/m6 engine requires some finesse out of the hole..

speaking of higher speed pull the m5 actually is about even (maybe a smidge slower) with the sl65 at triple digit speeds... and the sl65 is noticeably faster than the sl55 at said speeds.

it is a less-known truth that at speeds 350 tq spread wide all the way to 8250 rpms and 7 gears maybe faster than 700 tq spread wide to 6000 rpms and 5 gears...

alex
few cars
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2008 | 10:08 AM
  #107  
AMGSport's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by transferred
Very close though so I don't know why this debate still continues.
Congrats for the most cogent statement in this thread.

I did not purchase my SL55 to whip everyone's ***. I bought it in order to be transported in style, comfort and speed, while knowing that I have the goods to tangle with anything on the street and - while perhaps not winning - certainly not being embarassed.

Last edited by AMGSport; Aug 16, 2008 at 10:11 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2008 | 08:05 PM
  #108  
JAYCL600's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,704
Likes: 28
From: 20854
new balance
Originally Posted by alx
the sl55 is slower than the m5 and the m6. i've driven extensively the sl55 and sl65 and i've owned an m5. this has been my experience from both sides of the fence.

from a dig the sl55 is even or even faster than the m5/m6 to about 60-80. once above that speed the big m cars start to pull. around town the sl55 is faster just because it takes the driver out of the equation while the peaky m5/m6 engine requires some finesse out of the hole..

speaking of higher speed pull the m5 actually is about even (maybe a smidge slower) with the sl65 at triple digit speeds... and the sl65 is noticeably faster than the sl55 at said speeds.

it is a less-known truth that at speeds 350 tq spread wide all the way to 8250 rpms and 7 gears maybe faster than 700 tq spread wide to 6000 rpms and 5 gears...

alex
few cars
so a modded m5 should crush an SL65 right? Let me know when you want some video proof otherwise.
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 04:19 PM
  #109  
alx's Avatar
alx
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,268
Likes: 253
Originally Posted by JAYCL600
so a modded m5 should crush an SL65 right? Let me know when you want some video proof otherwise.
i have not driven a modded m5 as power moded m5s are few and far apart, so i dont know how it will fare. the m folks have done an excellent job to begin with so there is not much extra power to be had. supposedly dinan has some serious power upgrades for the m5/m6, but i have never driven one not to mention raced anybody to know the outcome.

alex
few cars
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 05:51 PM
  #110  
Addicted2Speed's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 1
From: Miami, FL
Lotus Elise SLK55
Originally Posted by alx
the sl55 is slower than the m5 and the m6. i've driven extensively the sl55 and sl65 and i've owned an m5. this has been my experience from both sides of the fence.

from a dig the sl55 is even or even faster than the m5/m6 to about 60-80. once above that speed the big m cars start to pull. around town the sl55 is faster just because it takes the driver out of the equation while the peaky m5/m6 engine requires some finesse out of the hole..

speaking of higher speed pull the m5 actually is about even (maybe a smidge slower) with the sl65 at triple digit speeds... and the sl65 is noticeably faster than the sl55 at said speeds.

it is a less-known truth that at speeds 350 tq spread wide all the way to 8250 rpms and 7 gears maybe faster than 700 tq spread wide to 6000 rpms and 5 gears...

alex
few cars
You're crazy if you think SL65 is anywhere near M5/M6 in terms of acceleration. 65 will consistently trap 120-122mph in the 1/4 mile, the highest M5/M6 can hope to achieve is 116-117mph... that's a difference of 10 car lengths! We're talking stock now. Give 65 a simple ecu upgrade and it will run 10.8 in the 1/4 mile! Not even M5 with nitrous has run sub 11's! Modded M5's can barely break 12's in the 1/4 mile!

Last edited by Addicted2Speed; Aug 17, 2008 at 05:54 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 06:12 PM
  #111  
JAYCL600's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,704
Likes: 28
From: 20854
new balance
Originally Posted by alx
i have not driven a modded m5 as power moded m5s are few and far apart, so i dont know how it will fare. the m folks have done an excellent job to begin with so there is not much extra power to be had. supposedly dinan has some serious power upgrades for the m5/m6, but i have never driven one not to mention raced anybody to know the outcome.

alex
few cars
Actually there is plenty of power to be had through modifications on this platform, and many people have performed these mods. A stock M is coming in at around 410-415 HP at the wheels. The modded ones are coming in at 460-470 at the wheels, thats a huge gain for a naturally aspirated setup and good for 3-4 mph in trap speed. Heres a very healty example of a highly modified M, the M5 of DarrenDallas makes 485rwhp and just recently raced an SL65 from a roll. I guess what I am getting at is that a stock M5 will be no where close to an SL65 from a roll as you outlined above.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1p1IkfE5mw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bzf7mjG_Gv4

Last edited by JAYCL600; Aug 17, 2008 at 10:06 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 06:37 PM
  #112  
yaroslav's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 176
Likes: 1
From: Odessa,Ukraine
GL550 , CL6.3 AMG
Originally Posted by JAYCL600
Actually there is plenty of power to be had thruough modifications on this platform, and many people have performed these mods. A stock M is coming in at around 410-415 HP at the wheels. The modded ones are coming in at 460-470 at the wheels, thats a huge gain for a naturally aspirated setup and good for 3-4 mph in trap speed. Heres a very healty example of a highly modified M, the M5 of DarrenDallas makes 485rwhp and just recently raced an SL65 from a roll. I guess what I am getting at is that a stock M5 will be no where close to an SL65 from a roll as you outlined above.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1p1IkfE5mw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bzf7mjG_Gv4
Stock M5 has 507hp. If at the wheels 410-415 HP.
21-22% loss??
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2008 | 08:55 AM
  #113  
JAYCL600's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,704
Likes: 28
From: 20854
new balance
Originally Posted by yaroslav
Stock M5 has 507hp. If at the wheels 410-415 HP.
21-22% loss??
Lets show the math of both examples
410/80.8%=507.42 crank HP = 19.2% drivetrain loss
415/81.8%=507.33 crank HP = 18.2% drivetrain loss
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 04:47 AM
  #114  
yaroslav's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 176
Likes: 1
From: Odessa,Ukraine
GL550 , CL6.3 AMG
Originally Posted by JAYCL600
Lets show the math of both examples
410/80.8%=507.42 crank HP = 19.2% drivetrain loss
415/81.8%=507.33 crank HP = 18.2% drivetrain loss
18-19% is a lot! Z06 has 13-14% of loss.
CLS63 has 20% loss with automatic transmission.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 10:09 AM
  #115  
sound 8's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 19
From: U.K.
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
sound 8

see my thread , AMG not that fast.
in general discussions
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 10:17 AM
  #116  
JAYCL600's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,704
Likes: 28
From: 20854
new balance
Originally Posted by sound 8
see my thread , AMG not that fast.
in general discussions
go away troll
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 10:44 AM
  #117  
sound 8's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 19
From: U.K.
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
sound 8 troll

Sorry SL55 MKB you have said the wrong thing, and now they are calling you a troll or worse. You have insulted the precious AMG name . Your post was good and explains that AMG or not you can't always win. All the pansies
that think bling is more important than facts will knock your driving skills.
They all have tunnel vision, more power will always win, they never consider
power to weight, handling qualities and numerous other things that make one car quicker than another. I love my SL55, it's a great coupe and a convertible
but I know there are quicker cars, the trouble with most AMG owners is
they wouldn't admit getting beat let alone posting it, they don't want to be
called a ....TROLL.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 03:37 PM
  #118  
alx's Avatar
alx
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,268
Likes: 253
read my post more carefully.

the seriously moded for power m5/m6s are few and far apart. you need serious hardware (headers, cams, full exhaust, etc.) to get 30-40hp more at the wheels- a ecu reflash gets you _nothing_ as opposed on the sl where it gets you a lot (how strong is your tranny?)

regarding the m5/m6 being faster. never said it. read my post carefully (again). i said that at triple digit speeds the m5/m6 will stick around.

i have driven all four cars (m5/6 and sl55/65) and i have done impromptu and organized highway pulls up to some serious speeds. i am not imagining when i am telling you that you might be surprised at what is happening at higher speeds.

also check the net. there are videos. there is a video (if i remember correctly) from the m5 board where sl65 and m5 were racing on a runway. the sl65 could not pull away at high speeds.

alex
few cars
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 10:58 AM
  #119  
alms21's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 1
From: Frederick, MD
'17 CLS550
Originally Posted by sound 8
Sorry SL55 MKB you have said the wrong thing, and now they are calling you a troll or worse. You have insulted the precious AMG name . Your post was good and explains that AMG or not you can't always win. All the pansies
that think bling is more important than facts will knock your driving skills.
They all have tunnel vision, more power will always win, they never consider
power to weight, handling qualities and numerous other things that make one car quicker than another. I love my SL55, it's a great coupe and a convertible
but I know there are quicker cars, the trouble with most AMG owners is
they wouldn't admit getting beat let alone posting it, they don't want to be
called a ....TROLL.
Can you please pass me whatever it is you're smoking. The OP is a clown and hasn't been back for eons. He was a troll......nothing more, nothing less.

He claims an M3 beat an SL55

.....and before you go on with any AMG fanboi BS just check my signature
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 01:10 PM
  #120  
sound 8's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 19
From: U.K.
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
sound 8 facts right

sorry don't smoke.
And get your facts right it was an M6 vs a SL55AMG.
I think the M6 would pinch it, Iv'e seen 4.2 to 60 a M6
The Sl55 is around 4.6 If the SL600 came with AMG styling you can tune
the engine very easily then you'd wop an M6.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 11:31 PM
  #121  
alms21's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 1
From: Frederick, MD
'17 CLS550
Originally Posted by sound 8
sorry don't smoke.
And get your facts right it was an M6 vs a SL55AMG.
I think the M6 would pinch it, Iv'e seen 4.2 to 60 a M6
The Sl55 is around 4.6 If the SL600 came with AMG styling you can tune
the engine very easily then you'd wop an M6.
wrong answer junior.................see post #22 from this thread below. The OP is an assclown and a troll. It has been proven here time and time again. Go live in your dream world. Even if the M6 is faster (which it isn't) it looks like ***.....and everyone knows you can't outrun ugly.

Bmw M3 Vs Sl55 Amg

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Look what i found...a race between a ///M3 with only 360 hp against my 55k engine with 500hp...I think we MB owners shouldnt dream alot..What will the new ///M3 do to my SL .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=th1rYrv-oXY

Last edited by alms21; Aug 22, 2008 at 11:35 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2008 | 01:57 AM
  #122  
bigben320e's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 9
From: Blasting off!
CLS63 Designo Edition, Hyundai Genesis 3.8 , Veloster Turbo, CLS500(Sold), E320 (SMOKED) R500 (Sold)
This is just nuts. I feel like I am having de ja vu, and that's not my wife's name.

Again, we have the usual trolls around trying to say the AMG's sucks, the M's are so much better, M's are faster, blah, blah, blah.

To the OP, and Sound 8: Why in the hell are you guys coming on a MB forum and stating these claims? For what purpose? It would make more sense if you posted your findings and videos (which are all suspect at best) on a Bimmer board. You can boast and get it on with the Bimmer heads. Get outta here already.

Now on another point, you guys either are:

1. Trolling
2. Lying
3. Bimmer fans trying to get jollies here on MB
4. Really suck at driving
5. Idiots for spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on cars, and then come here to bash them.

Say 5 to yourself. It sounds really stupid when you say it out loud.

Guys, I would not even entertain this trash and these trolls must be stomped. Don't even argue with them, IMO.

Remember: From a distance in a argument you cannot tell the fool for the valid person. Enough said, mods/admins shut em down.

Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 03:18 PM
  #123  
sound 8's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 19
From: U.K.
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
sound 8 bigben 320e

You owe me an apology, read AMG not that fast.
You have a big mouth and a narrow mind, and anybody
who does not toe the AMG line is an idiot to you.
Discussion to you is trolling, grow up.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 05:34 PM
  #124  
bigben320e's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 9
From: Blasting off!
CLS63 Designo Edition, Hyundai Genesis 3.8 , Veloster Turbo, CLS500(Sold), E320 (SMOKED) R500 (Sold)
Originally Posted by sound 8
You owe me an apology, read AMG not that fast.
You have a big mouth and a narrow mind, and anybody
who does not toe the AMG line is an idiot to you.
Discussion to you is trolling, grow up.
Nobody owes you an apology. If anything, you should question the point of you coming to an MB forum in the first place. All your posts have stated nothing but negatives on AMG's. I did not resort to name calling, but the logic and content of your posts makes you look suspect and appear to be trolling.

I of course read you post AMG not that fast, and you flamed pretty bad and not by myself. The point you don't get is this (and this is why you are well received by anyone here): MBWorld is a forum to talk about the cars we love, MB's. This is not a bash and trash forum of MB's, and sure you can post facts and we can have an intelligent conversation. As of yet, I have not seen this from you. All your posts are sketchy, suspect, and misleading at best.

Learn to follow a discussion, and don't add things in I did not state here.

Reply
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 09:58 AM
  #125  
sound 8's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 19
From: U.K.
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
sound 8 pace car

I got call the other day, there was an F1 race local and the pace car
was broken, could you come with your SL55 and be the pace car.
Yes ! I said. On the way to the circuit I blew away an M6 and a M5 having a race, and just before I got there I polished of a Ferrari 430.
When I got on the circuit I was told to slow down as the F1 cars couldn't
stay with me. On the way home I left a Veyron for dead.

bigben 320e,is this what you want to hear, or can we have a sensible discussion on how fast or slow our cars are, apart from the practicle side.

And please a little less ...do you wanna be in my gang......I know let's get him banned attitude. As mature Merc owner and car fanatic, I hope
to bring something to this forum, replies not insults. I'm sorry if it sounds
like I'm bashing MB, but I'm not, however as good as the cars are the sales
and service in this country sucks. That's bashing.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:29 PM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE