SL55 AMG, SL63 AMG, SL65 AMG (R230) 2002 - 2011 (2003 US for SL55 and 2004 for the SL65)

SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: SL55 vs SL600

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-02-2011, 09:48 PM
  #76  
Senior Member
 
OK55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mercedes E55 AMG (2006), Mercedes 560 SEL (1991)
Originally Posted by TC600
Went to the dealer to test drive an 05' SL550 Friday. They offered it to replace my 600 that fell off the lift. It didn't seem as fast so I pulled over with the salesman in the car and did the "Sneaky Reset". The reset helped quite a bit with the shifting positions but I noticed since it shifted at higher RPMs that the torque really fell off between shifts. The 55 does not seem to have the "Wall of Torque" that the 600 does. I truly liked the sound of the 55 more, but did not have the consistent pull of my old 600. I've decided to have them try to find a replacement 600 for me.
You might want to have a look at the 06 sl55 which had a different throttle body and put out significantly more power and torque than earlier models...
Brgds
Old 05-03-2011, 04:13 AM
  #77  
Super Member
 
LukasBMW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 574
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
2005 C55 AMG - 2018 340i - 2006 SL55 AMG - Sold
Originally Posted by OK55
You might want to have a look at the 06 sl55 which had a different throttle body and put out significantly more power and torque than earlier models...
Brgds
I was under the impression the US SL55 from 2003-2006 was unchanged engine wise. In 2007, the US got a slightly revised SL55 engine putting out more power.

Can someone clarify?

I ask as my old 2006 SL55 has felt significantly faster then a few 2004 SL55's I looked at. I'm starting to think my old 2006 SL55 (that I bought used) had a chip....unless 2006 was the first year in the US of the upgraded engine.
Old 05-03-2011, 07:00 AM
  #78  
Senior Member
 
OK55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mercedes E55 AMG (2006), Mercedes 560 SEL (1991)
This link might help. https://mbworld.org/forums/sl55-amg-...03-2005-a.html

Brgds
Old 12-10-2018, 01:35 AM
  #79  
Newbie
 
John Mcnerney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 cl65
Addicted to speed

Originally Posted by leadfoot
How do these cars perform vs each other.What are the benefits of one over the other?Thanks
Originally Posted by Addicted2Speed
You should do a search, there are a lot of threads on this topic. SL600 is potentially much faster, you only need a reflash to run low to mid 11's; I never saw SL55 break into 11's, even modden. Chipped SL600 will actually be faster than stock SL65. Handling wise, neither is a sports car and I haven't noticed much difference. In my opinion V12 bi-turbo > V8 kompressor any day
addicted to speed. Which of these two cars do you own or have you owned both at one time or another? just another guy who looks up crap on the internet. Keep your cut and pastes to yourself unless you have driven both cars so YOU can compare, not some magazine influenced by preference I am currently driving a Cl65 but out of the countless six-figure cars that I've owned the SL55 is my favorite of all time as far as performance and looks, the SL600 is no slouch and does have some more refinements but in no way is a sports car I've had both of them into a 45 degree turn at 80 miles an hour and the pucker factor is way less in the SL55

Last edited by John Mcnerney; 12-10-2018 at 01:40 AM. Reason: Misspelling
Old 12-10-2018, 02:04 AM
  #80  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
blueSL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,447
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
SL55 AMG
The SL600 has more torque than the SL55 which means it is fractionally faster but it’s not night and day different. The cars are heavy, and the extra V12 weight in the front of the SL600 makes for poorer turn in. It’s correct not to think of them as sports cars, more luxury GTs from their time even though they look and feel quite dated these days.

The cars are extremely expensive to maintain properly as they age and non-standard parts start failing, especially the suspension struts and if the brake by wire control unit fails, that is enough to possibly condemn the car.

if you are buying, check the roof, the car’s electrics and put it on a ramp. A leaking strut costs $1500-2000 a corner. A fully documented service history will help reassure you.

Old 12-10-2018, 10:55 AM
  #81  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Frederick NL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,342
Received 216 Likes on 185 Posts
2005 R 230 SL350 (M112 3.7). Sold the 1966 W113 230SL recently
Originally Posted by blueSL
if the brake by wire control unit fails, that is enough to possibly condemn the car.
I understand that that system came under an extended 25yr warranty.
The following users liked this post:
blueSL (12-10-2018)
Old 12-10-2018, 11:51 AM
  #82  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
blueSL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,447
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
SL55 AMG
Good news if so!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: SL55 vs SL600



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24 PM.