SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: SL65 vs SLR722 (yes I did it)
As for the the other people wondering why the 65 kept up so well with the 722, I think torque is the answer. When I was driving the 722 it was fast but fast in another way. It had a real powerful low end of each gear and then would taper off a bit not like the 65's seemingly endless power. But all and all the 722 is faster since launching is part of what makes a car fast and off the line it will get the 65 every time (with me driving it). I have seen a few youtube vids of people getting fantastic launches and times at the track in the 65. It seems there is a method to the madness.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The guy said the 722 was faster but it didn't sound like it was too embarasing like you have in your head. They are both 11 sec cars. The SL is no Gallardo that breaks 12 sec once by one guy after 50 tries, it is a legit 11 sec car pretty much every time unless the launch is blown. The SL has more tourque than the SLR, 4 more cylinders and the weight once rolling isn't a huge factor in a straight line so it shouldn't be blown away.

Now take a 722 which is lighter with more hp, and torque.
And just for you, Rob Ferretti went and shot me the same video of ANOTHER Sl65 going 20-130mph, just lik the one we shot with the SL65 and SLR in Scottsdale. The Sl65 in NJ ran 20-130mph in 13.66 seconds. Compare that to the 12.26 my SLR ran UPHILL in 110degree weather at a 2000ft elevation.


Nj Sl65
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyT4pGRAi2I
Arizona Sl65
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyeExglCfYk
Now take a 722 which is lighter with more hp, and torque.
And just for you, Rob Ferretti went and shot me the same video of ANOTHER Sl65 going 20-130mph, just lik the one we shot with the SL65 and SLR in Scottsdale. The Sl65 in NJ ran 20-130mph in 13.66 seconds. Compare that to the 12.26 my SLR ran UPHILL in 110degree weather at a 2000ft elevation.


Nj Sl65
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyT4pGRAi2I
Arizona Sl65
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyeExglCfYk
Oh, now no one can comment on a car they don't own?? The thread starter has the SL and obviously his buddy has the 722 so are you saying he just made this post up? What the hell does taping your speedo prove? I agree the SLR is faster. Your 11.4@127 is faster than my personal best of 11.6@124 but that certainly isn't destroying anything. Now after 120 I don't know exactly how it plays out so I am not commenting on that. I love the SLR so have no need to downplay its performance like you try to do of the SL. My main point was that you were nuts if you think the Gallardo had any shot of keeping up with the SL.

Lets see your video of your so called BEST 11.6@124. What tires where you running? How does your car miraculously run 124mph in the 1/4 when every Sl65 Ive seen has trapped right around 120mph? This fact is also backed up by Biturboamg who also owns has a drag raced his SL65 here.
Joe Currys Time slip for his full renntech Sl65 is on drag times, his mph is lower in Az then yours is for your totally stock car. But as I said, you did this, you did that, but of course you have no proof. Atleast i document whatever it is I say i do, win lose, or draw. You my friend, are full of crap.
Its also funny that you say your car was BONE stock, so I am assuming you are also saying that it was STOCK tires, and you are gettting times like the people on drag radials. To get an 11.60 you need something like a 1.7 short time, GOOD LUCK ON STREET TIRES.
Also we are out here running in the desert, not in the dead of winter in Maryland.

On the dyno it put down 525 RWHP so it is not a crazy strong SL65 by any means.
On drag radials my best time was 11.45. I will try and dig up some time slips from my last outing where I ran 11.50's.
A bunch of people on this board know me and have seen all of my AMG cars run on the strip so I am sure they can vouch for my numbers.
As mentioned the SLR and the 722 should be faster based on power to weight but assraped? no. The difference between a 11.5 and a 12.0 car is how many car lengths?
Cheers,
Schiz


