SL55 AMG, SL63 AMG, SL65 AMG (R230) 2002 - 2011 (2003 US for SL55 and 2004 for the SL65)

SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Johnson IC pump upgrade, CM30 or CM90?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-02-2008 | 11:17 AM
  #1  
Marky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Sweden, Europe
AMG
Johnson IC pump upgrade, CM30 or CM90?

I have a 2005 S65 AMG. Now it’s time to get rid of the stock Bosch pump and upgrade to a Johnson pump.

I have read a lot of these pumps and there seems to be a lot of people that now uses the Johnson pump. Some people have used the CM30 and some have used the CM90.

What is best to do? Should I go with CM30 or CM90? How much extra work does it require to exchange the stock pump? Are the Johnson pumps just bolt on or do I need some extra parts to make the pump fit? I have read somewhere that the CM90 requires extra work to make it fit, but it is worth the extra job? Are there noticeable performance gains with the CM90 compared to the CM30?

FYI I have also plans on an ECU upgrade.

Thanks in advance.

/Marky
Old 02-02-2008 | 03:03 PM
  #2  
JAYCL600's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,704
Likes: 26
From: 20854
new balance
cm30 bolton
Old 02-02-2008 | 05:36 PM
  #3  
Marky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Sweden, Europe
AMG
Originally Posted by E55JAY
cm30 bolton
I guess you use the CM30? Do you think there are any noticeable performance gains with the CM90 compared to the CM30?
Old 02-05-2008 | 03:43 PM
  #4  
Marky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Sweden, Europe
AMG
Anyone else with experience of the CM30 or CM90?
Old 02-05-2008 | 04:29 PM
  #5  
jmf003's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 4
From: Ann Arbor
'03 SL55
Originally Posted by Marky
Anyone else with experience of the CM30 or CM90?
Suggest you try searching the W211 E55 forum for CM30 CM90. There was some discussion on this topic a while back.

If I recall correctly, consensus was the CM30 was easier to fit but views diverged as to which pump provided superior cooling. Some guys felt the CM90 flow rate was too great to allow the heat exchanger to do its job properly and the CM30 would do better. Not everyone agreed.

Hope that helps.
Old 02-05-2008 | 04:36 PM
  #6  
Marky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Sweden, Europe
AMG
Originally Posted by jmf003
Suggest you try searching the W211 E55 forum for CM30 CM90. There was some discussion on this topic a while back.

If I recall correctly, consensus was the CM30 was easier to fit but views diverged as to which pump provided superior cooling. Some guys felt the CM90 flow rate was too great to allow the heat exchanger to do its job properly and the CM30 would do better. Not everyone agreed.

Hope that helps.
Thanks for the information!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Johnson IC pump upgrade, CM30 or CM90?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:13 AM.