SL55 AMG, SL63 AMG, SL65 AMG (R230) 2002 - 2011 (2003 US for SL55 and 2004 for the SL65)

SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Is SL63 a bad buy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-05-2008, 08:30 AM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Germancar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 4,846
Received 290 Likes on 203 Posts
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
Lets see. 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008...2009, 2010, 2011...well it is most definitely going to go 9 or so years, but not 12.

M
Old 03-05-2008, 09:26 AM
  #27  
Super Member
 
SL2003driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
CLS63, GLK350
Originally Posted by JackStraw
It is not correct to say that MB is retrofitting the SL with a less powerful engine. They are phasing out the 5.5 liter supercharged engine and replacing it with a modern AMG designed and built 6.3 liter NA engine.

MB had to change the front of the SL to bring it into compliance with the EU pedestrian safety standards. If they hadn't addressed this, the company would not have been able to sell the SL in Europe going forward.

We are all just speculating when the new SL (R231?) will be introduced, but most people here think it will be in 3-4 years. It is hard to imagine that it will be any longer than that given the rest of the design changes that have taken place throughout the lineup.
Jack nailed it
Old 03-05-2008, 10:19 AM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sprins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
CLK63BS, SL55, G55, C43
Originally Posted by Germancar1
Lets see. 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008...2009, 2010, 2011...well it is most definitely going to go 9 or so years, but not 12.
You forgot 2002, which makes it 10 years or so. I predict anywhere between 10 to 12 years (counting from introduction).

But then again: What do I know?
Old 03-05-2008, 03:05 PM
  #29  
Super Member
 
SL2003driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
CLS63, GLK350
Originally Posted by sprins
You forgot 2002, which makes it 10 years or so. I predict anywhere between 10 to 12 years (counting from introduction).

But then again: What do I know?
The last model went 12 so that would make 2014 the right answer. Sounds like they will start with the SLC and then a year later do the SL based on a mag article I just read. Who cares really it will be when it will be. I'm just glad I did not wait and buy one of the pedestrian bumper designs
Old 03-06-2008, 03:09 AM
  #30  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Germancar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 4,846
Received 290 Likes on 203 Posts
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
Originally Posted by sprins
You forgot 2002, which makes it 10 years or so. I predict anywhere between 10 to 12 years (counting from introduction).

But then again: What do I know?
Well you count model years, not calendar years. It came out in the fall of 2001 at the Frankfurt auto show, and landed here in the U.S. in the spring of 2002 as a 2003 model. If you're going to count calender years, the SL is already 8 years old!

M
Old 03-06-2008, 04:34 AM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sprins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
CLK63BS, SL55, G55, C43
Originally Posted by Germancar1
Well you count model years, not calendar years. It came out in the fall of 2001 at the Frankfurt auto show, and landed here in the U.S. in the spring of 2002 as a 2003 model. If you're going to count calender years, the SL is already 8 years old!
In other parts of the world there actually are MY2002 models. Taking that into account it is ideed 8 years old.
Old 03-06-2008, 04:49 AM
  #32  
CY
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL/M6
Originally Posted by sprins
And the source of this knowledge is?
My gut.

Look at the current lifespan on most cars lately. MB is changing their models just as much or more then the other brands.

The SL is not selling well at all and the current refresh is really not going over as well as they would have liked (although they probably were expecting some negative feedback due to the circumstances), considering how many people dont like it (specifically the new front end on the old frame...I personally like the new front end if it was mated to a new car) on numerous forums etc. even without seeing it the flesh. Also the R129 didnt have as much competition as the current SL has: Aston, Maserati, R8, 6 series and then the obvious: 997, XK8 etc.

I would say it really depends how the car sells so they can gauge the demand vs the competition and extend or shorten its life accordingly. Id be very surprised if the car makes it 12 years. If I was a betting man I'd put my money on 2-3 more years of life for the R230 max.

The fact that I bought my SL brand new (not a SL55 btw) at the end of 2005 for $25,000 off and that a 2008 can be had for up to $30,000 off makes it hard for me to believe a new front end can keep this car profitable until 2013.

Last edited by CY; 03-06-2008 at 05:06 AM.
Old 03-06-2008, 08:28 AM
  #33  
Super Member
 
SL2003driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
CLS63, GLK350
Originally Posted by CY
My gut.

The fact that I bought my SL brand new (not a SL55 btw) at the end of 2005 for $25,000 off and that a 2008 can be had for up to $30,000 off makes it hard for me to believe a new front end can keep this car profitable until 2013.
Don't be saying that I felt good about getting $19K off Bought a $102,500 new 2008 SL550 for $83,500. Local MB dealer has a 2006 with 14K miles for $68K, but the 2006 has the old engine so I look at this as an expense toy. I agree that the new one will be out for the 2012 model year. I wouldn't buy a 2009-2011, they will take a major hit.
Old 03-06-2008, 05:36 PM
  #34  
CY
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL/M6
Originally Posted by SL2003driver
Don't be saying that I felt good about getting $19K off Bought a $102,500 new 2008 SL550 for $83,500. Local MB dealer has a 2006 with 14K miles for $68K, but the 2006 has the old engine so I look at this as an expense toy. I agree that the new one will be out for the 2012 model year. I wouldn't buy a 2009-2011, they will take a major hit.
Sorry bro...I didnt get the color I wanted though (wanted black) and I didnt have in a trade in which you did.
Old 03-06-2008, 06:08 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
husk323's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: orange county, CA
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Tesla Roadster Sport
Originally Posted by CY

The fact that I bought my SL brand new (not a SL55 btw) at the end of 2005 for $25,000 off and that a 2008 can be had for up to $30,000 off makes it hard for me to believe a new front end can keep this car profitable until 2013.

I thought you leased your car?
Old 03-06-2008, 06:42 PM
  #36  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Carl Lassiter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: L.A., CA
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'08 M5, '10 Land Cruiser
Originally Posted by husk323
I thought you leased your car?
+1.

I hadn't heard of this guy until I read about him getting a 650i Conv. Nice car for a conv but a hell of a lot of them about here in L.A.
Old 03-07-2008, 04:41 AM
  #37  
CY
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL/M6
:
Originally Posted by husk323
I thought you leased your car?
Either way, the purchase price was 76K and the retail was over $101K. The payment was about $700 and the downpayment $8k or so...27 months 10k miles per year...I was 23 at the time and the car was in my name....not the worst deal IMO. But I guess I had no choice but to lease my $100K+ car which I would sell in less then 3 years anyway. Damn I guess I should have "bought" and lost $20,000 or so extra on my SL.

not

btw I love your SL...one day I will "buy" one of those.

Last edited by CY; 03-07-2008 at 05:12 AM.
Old 03-07-2008, 04:45 AM
  #38  
CY
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL/M6
Originally Posted by Carl Lassiter
+1.

I hadn't heard of this guy until I read about him getting a 650i Conv. Nice car for a conv but a hell of a lot of them about here in L.A.
No need to talk about me in 3rd person bro...Im on the same forum as you. Its pretty funny actually that you havent "heard" of me since Ive been a member longer then you and have more posts.


Also, if you look into the actual stats in regards to #'s of cars in LA you will find there are thousands more R230 SL's on the road here in comparison to the 6 series conv's...but again that really didnt influence my intial decision anyway. Oh and the E60 body 5 series is probably more common then some Honda models here in LA...good thing you have a "M"....really stands out.

not

Just messing with you...the M5 is sick

Last edited by CY; 03-07-2008 at 05:19 AM.
Old 03-07-2008, 09:17 AM
  #39  
Super Member
 
SL2003driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
CLS63, GLK350
Originally Posted by CY
:

Either way, the purchase price was 76K and the retail was over $101K. The payment was about $700 and the downpayment $8k or so...27 months 10k miles per year...I was 23 at the time and the car was in my name....not the worst deal IMO. But I guess I had no choice but to lease my $100K+ car which I would sell in less then 3 years anyway. Damn I guess I should have "bought" and lost $20,000 or so extra on my SL.

not

btw I love your SL...one day I will "buy" one of those.
CY, your doing well young man. The idea for guys like us is to own them all at least once before we die
Old 03-07-2008, 07:30 PM
  #40  
CY
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL/M6
Originally Posted by SL2003driver
CY, your doing well young man. The idea for guys like us is to own them all at least once before we die
exactly...great minds think alike.
Old 03-08-2008, 01:08 AM
  #41  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Murtaza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63S coupe, X5M
Originally Posted by juicee63
does it also have Launch Control?
It does bro, it's called 531lb feet of torque.

Old 03-10-2008, 02:14 AM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
TurboTuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your best off buying a current SL 65, and it looks better than the new one to most of us.
Old 03-10-2008, 03:36 AM
  #43  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Germancar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 4,846
Received 290 Likes on 203 Posts
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
Originally Posted by sprins
In other parts of the world there actually are MY2002 models. Taking that into account it is ideed 8 years old.
Well of course, but that really doesn't matter here as far as our model years go.

M
Old 03-10-2008, 11:19 AM
  #44  
Junior Member
 
European's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL55AMG 2007 red/designo red, S500L Carlsson 2002 Black/Red designo
Originally Posted by juicee63
Oh WOW!!!

Thanks for the info.

does it also have Launch Control?

Man the 2008 SL55 is a monster. These guys are jokers with the HP ratings.
from 469-510 same engine LOL..
Hi!

I have 2008 SL 55 AMG with 517 HP.

I Drag raced with my friend who has SL 55 amg 2006, From start I go 2-3 cars ahead of him! and when we rolled from 50kmh I was ahead of him for 2 cars up to 150kmh and when we reached 250kmh 155milled I was 5-7 cars ahead of him!!!!

Trust me, I own 2008 SL55 AMG, and my friend has 2006 SL 55, Its a huge difference!!!
Old 03-10-2008, 11:37 AM
  #45  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jimand7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: chicago
Posts: 421
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2023 Range rover 2022 RAM TRX (bad ass):) - 2023 911 Turbo 2019 Wrangler 2021 E63s Wagon
Originally Posted by Murtaza
It does bro, it's called 531lb feet of torque.

the best launch control there is!!!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Is SL63 a bad buy?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:31 AM.