SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Is SL63 a bad buy?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 427
Likes: 3
From: chicago
2023 Range rover 2022 RAM TRX (bad ass):) - 2023 911 Turbo 2019 Wrangler 2021 E63s Wagon 2024 GLS580
Is SL63 a bad buy?
Even if you love the updates made to the buetiful R230 chassis, does it make sense to buy it in the last 2 years of of its life? Especially given that the SL55 is listed as .2 seconds faster to 60 and the 600 is from all i hear is about a tick faster than that...just a random thought...
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,436
Likes: 6
300ce
Even if you love the updates made to the buetiful R230 chassis, does it make sense to buy it in the last 2 years of of its life? Especially given that the SL55 is listed as .2 seconds faster to 60 and the 600 is from all i hear is about a tick faster than that...just a random thought...
Ted
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Even if you love the updates made to the buetiful R230 chassis, does it make sense to buy it in the last 2 years of of its life? Especially given that the SL55 is listed as .2 seconds faster to 60 and the 600 is from all i hear is about a tick faster than that...just a random thought...
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 427
Likes: 3
From: chicago
2023 Range rover 2022 RAM TRX (bad ass):) - 2023 911 Turbo 2019 Wrangler 2021 E63s Wagon 2024 GLS580
Well it is never about residual value to me, The question was less a dollars and cents but more "sense" if you will. with the replacement chassis so close, i wonder why mercedes is spending the money to retrofit the SL with a less powerful engine?
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 5
From: Ann Arbor
'03 SL55
As far as engines go, the 6.2 is a terrific engine. It makes as much horsepower as the 55K engine but without supercharging. It doesn't have as much low end torque, though, so it's not quite as quick off the line. From a roll, though, an SL63 is going to be about as fast as an SL55.
All-in-all I think the SL55 is a marginally better car but if a friend was thinking seriously of buying an SL63, I wouldn't try to talk him/her out of it.
Trending Topics
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,761
Likes: 594
From: Seattle
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Even if you love the updates made to the buetiful R230 chassis, does it make sense to buy it in the last 2 years of of its life? Especially given that the SL55 is listed as .2 seconds faster to 60 and the 600 is from all i hear is about a tick faster than that...just a random thought...
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
Super Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 911
Likes: 1
From: Wichita
2005 SL600, 2011 Honda Odyssey Touring Elite
MB had to change the front of the SL to bring it into compliance with the EU pedestrian safety standards. If they hadn't addressed this, the company would not have been able to sell the SL in Europe going forward.
We are all just speculating when the new SL (R231?) will be introduced, but most people here think it will be in 3-4 years. It is hard to imagine that it will be any longer than that given the rest of the design changes that have taken place throughout the lineup.
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 354
Likes: 45
From: Chicago
e55
The whisper number for the N'Ring will be between 8:02-8:05. Reports are the SL 63 with perpormance package will be the most dynamic driving car of AMG 63 lineup. I think they are moving in the right direction with the new trans and 63 engine.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,952
Likes: 4
From: Hollywood CA
2011 twin turboed prius
Even if you love the updates made to the buetiful R230 chassis, does it make sense to buy it in the last 2 years of of its life? Especially given that the SL55 is listed as .2 seconds faster to 60 and the 600 is from all i hear is about a tick faster than that...just a random thought...
Basing a 130k purchase on a fantasy 0-62 test result is folley.
There is information that contradicts your post from many sources, this includes AMG the folks that BUILD the car and test it extensively prior to bringing it to market
http://www.mercedes-amg.com/index2.html
The SL 63 AMG accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in 4.6 seconds before quickly going on to a top speed of 250 km/h (electronically limited).
AMG supercharged 5.5 L (5439 cc) 24-valve V8 engine 497 hp (367 kW) at 6,100 rpm, 0 to 100 km/h (62 mph) 4.7 s
I show a 0-62 in 4.6 s from the horses mouth vs a 4.7s for the SL55.
The SL 63 is a HUGE improvement performance wise even over the 2007 63 models. MCT and the ability to choose 4 performance styles, plus TURNING OFF ESP completely w/o dyno mode is a plus. Ability to blip throttle, new telematics, better seats, brakes, , faster shifting 20%, man wish my car had all that the SL offers :-)
Looks wise I think the model it replaces looks better, but the performance enhancements are worth quite a bit.
The dynamic drive unit finds its perfect match in the SL 63 AMG suspension. The AMG sports suspension based on Active Body Control has been further enhanced and not only comes with new spring and damper tuning but also completely modified elastokinematics. The front axle bearings, the spring links and the torque strut along with individual strut bearings at the rear have been re-tuned to deliver greater agility and shorter stopping distances. In partnership with the optimised speed-sensitive power steering the SL 63 AMG now feels even more direct and livelier – enabling the driver to fully utilise the linear steering and oversteer/understeer characteristics typical of a sports car, especially on winding roads or a private racetrack. The AMG sports suspension based on Active Body Control also enables the suspension set-up to be customised. At the push of a button, the driver can select a sporty, firm response with reduced roll angles, or go for a comfort-focussed setting for excellent comfort on long journeys.
This sounds like an AMAZING improvement IMO
The Race Start function takes driving dynamics to an entirely new level: it enables the SL 63 AMG driver to call on maximum acceleration, while ensuring optimum traction of the driven wheels. While the vehicle is at a standstill, the driver needs to activate the ESP sports function and press the brake pedal with their left foot. Having preselected the Race Start program using the rotary switch, a confirmation message comes up on the AMG central display. The driver then simply needs to confirm the Race Start function by pulling the “Up” shift paddle once, fully depressing the accelerator and taking their foot off the brakes. The optimum start-up engine speed is set fully automatically and the SL 63 AMG accelerates away in an instant – as an option even up to the top speed. The driver does not need to shift gear manually; the AMG transmission changes gear with lightning-fast shift times.
THIS IS LC in A BENZ WOOOOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Last edited by juicee63; Mar 4, 2008 at 11:59 AM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1
From: L.A., CA
'08 M5, '10 Land Cruiser
Got to stop you there Jack Straw from Wichita. The FI 5.4l is being replaced by the NA 6.2l. Yes I'm feeling pedantic today. Carry on.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 5
From: Arizona
SL55AMG, Ferrari 348, Ferrari Testarossa, Ferrari F40, Ferrari Mondial t, Ducati 916, Indycar
Unfortunately it may not take that long to knock off 50%. However, from what I am reading they are introducing a trick gearbox with the SL63. It looks to be very cool, and a step in the right direction.
http://www.duemotori.com/news/auto_n...ansmission.php
http://www.duemotori.com/news/auto_n...ansmission.php
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 1
From: CA
2010 CL65
IIRC, CY02 SL55 scored 8:06 NBR (?SportAuto test)....
MY07-08 SL55 has ?30 more hp/lb-ft; ABC 2.0; sharper steering....presumably latest street tire tech/perf/grip is increased vs 5yrs prior....
Will be interesting to see what NBR time SL63 030 scores on street tires and in which MCT mode best time will be achieved...i.e., S+ vs Manual....
Am getting SL63 030 (Apr build)....having owned various new SL55/65 over past 5yrs, am really looking forward to this MCT box and the greater AMG focus on chassis precision....and the brilliant, linear 63 motor, which is ?75lbs lighter over nose than 55 motor.....
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 427
Likes: 3
From: chicago
2023 Range rover 2022 RAM TRX (bad ass):) - 2023 911 Turbo 2019 Wrangler 2021 E63s Wagon 2024 GLS580
[QUOTE=juicee63;2689180]Basing a 130k purchase on a fantasy 0-62 test result is folley.
There is information that contradicts your post from many sources, this includes AMG the folks that BUILD the car and test it extensively prior to bringing it to market
http://www.mercedes-amg.com/index2.html
The SL 63 AMG accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in 4.6 seconds before quickly going on to a top speed of 250 km/h (electronically limited).
AMG supercharged 5.5 L (5439 cc) 24-valve V8 engine 497 hp (367 kW) at 6,100 rpm, 0 to 100 km/h (62 mph) 4.7 s
I show a 0-62 in 4.6 s from the horses mouth vs a 4.7s for the SL55.
The SL 63 is a HUGE improvement performance wise even over the 2007 63 models. MCT and the ability to choose 4 performance styles, plus TURNING OFF ESP completely w/o dyno mode is a plus. Ability to blip throttle, new telematics, better seats, brakes, , faster shifting 20%, man wish my car had all that the SL offers :-)
But you will get all this + much more AND a new chassis, by waiting 2 yrs. I say 2 yrs because the sl63 will be a 2009 and by 2011 there has to be a new SL I would think. +the SL is a heavy car in need of tourque as much as HP.
BUt I suppose that in the first year the SL's will be hard to come by and tough to get and the AMG models will probably not come out right away. blah blah blah...so maybe....but if I had a sl65 or 55or 600 I would not trade it for the 63.
There is information that contradicts your post from many sources, this includes AMG the folks that BUILD the car and test it extensively prior to bringing it to market
http://www.mercedes-amg.com/index2.html
The SL 63 AMG accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in 4.6 seconds before quickly going on to a top speed of 250 km/h (electronically limited).
AMG supercharged 5.5 L (5439 cc) 24-valve V8 engine 497 hp (367 kW) at 6,100 rpm, 0 to 100 km/h (62 mph) 4.7 s
I show a 0-62 in 4.6 s from the horses mouth vs a 4.7s for the SL55.
The SL 63 is a HUGE improvement performance wise even over the 2007 63 models. MCT and the ability to choose 4 performance styles, plus TURNING OFF ESP completely w/o dyno mode is a plus. Ability to blip throttle, new telematics, better seats, brakes, , faster shifting 20%, man wish my car had all that the SL offers :-)
But you will get all this + much more AND a new chassis, by waiting 2 yrs. I say 2 yrs because the sl63 will be a 2009 and by 2011 there has to be a new SL I would think. +the SL is a heavy car in need of tourque as much as HP.
BUt I suppose that in the first year the SL's will be hard to come by and tough to get and the AMG models will probably not come out right away. blah blah blah...so maybe....but if I had a sl65 or 55or 600 I would not trade it for the 63.
Last edited by jimand7; Mar 4, 2008 at 12:24 PM.
Super Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 911
Likes: 1
From: Wichita
2005 SL600, 2011 Honda Odyssey Touring Elite
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 5
From: Ann Arbor
'03 SL55
Juicee, FWIW the 4.7 second 0-62 time is for the older 497 horsepower SL55s. The more recent 517 horsepower SL55s had a factory-reported 0-62 time of 4.5 seconds, just a tick faster than the SL63's factory-reported 0-62 time.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,952
Likes: 4
From: Hollywood CA
2011 twin turboed prius
Oh WOW!!!
Thanks for the info.
does it also have Launch Control?
Man the 2008 SL55 is a monster. These guys are jokers with the HP ratings.
from 469-510 same engine LOL..
Last edited by juicee63; Mar 4, 2008 at 03:01 PM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 5
From: Ann Arbor
'03 SL55
You know, if you don't like other people making polite corrections to your posts there's an easy solution: don't post incorrect facts in the first place.
Re: your second post, as you know there is no launch control on the SL55. Yet despite its inferior engine, inferior transmission, and lack of launch control the 2008 SL55 launches faster than the 2009 SL63. Go figure.
While MB does appear to play games with the horsepower numbers that's not the case with the late model SL55s versus the early model SL55s. The later model SL55s have an 80 mm throttle body and genuinely do produce more horsepower. Hence the decreased 0-62 time for the later model SL55s.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,952
Likes: 4
From: Hollywood CA
2011 twin turboed prius
Sarcasm.
You know, if you don't like other people making polite corrections to your posts there's an easy solution: don't post incorrect facts in the first place.
Re: your second post, as you know there is no launch control on the SL55. Yet despite its inferior engine, inferior transmission, and lack of launch control the 2008 SL55 launches faster than the 2009 SL63. Go figure.
While MB does appear to play games with the horsepower numbers that's not the case with the late model SL55s versus the early model SL55s. The later model SL55s have an 80 mm throttle body and genuinely do produce more horsepower. Hence the decreased 0-62 time for the later model SL55s.
You know, if you don't like other people making polite corrections to your posts there's an easy solution: don't post incorrect facts in the first place.
Re: your second post, as you know there is no launch control on the SL55. Yet despite its inferior engine, inferior transmission, and lack of launch control the 2008 SL55 launches faster than the 2009 SL63. Go figure.
While MB does appear to play games with the horsepower numbers that's not the case with the late model SL55s versus the early model SL55s. The later model SL55s have an 80 mm throttle body and genuinely do produce more horsepower. Hence the decreased 0-62 time for the later model SL55s.
Thats great the SL55 has some features that make it faster in a straight line but it is unlikely the SL 55 08 would keep up on the ring with this new 63.
As far as the 0-62 times looks like a .1 difference not the .2 the OP claimed.
In my mind many of the new features of the 63 are well worth the price of the car. Wonder if the C63 has this Launch control feature?
The new SL 55 AMG accelerates from 0 to 62 mph in 4.5 seconds (outgoing model: 4.7 seconds) and goes on to reach an electronically limited top speed of 155 mph.
AMG has the 63 rated at 4.6s so there is a .1 difference 0-62mph not significant, while a few seconds on the ring will be.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 19
From: Kuwait
CLS55 2006, CLS 63S 2015
I was not being sarcastic, I had no clue the 07 SL55 had more HP and appreciate the correction TY
Thats great the SL55 has some features that make it faster in a straight line but it is unlikely the SL 55 08 would keep up on the ring with this new 63.
As far as the 0-62 times looks like a .1 difference not the .2 the OP claimed.
In my mind many of the new features of the 63 are well worth the price of the car. Wonder if the C63 has this Launch control feature?
AMG has the 63 rated at 4.6s so there is a .1 difference 0-62mph not significant, while a few seconds on the ring will be.
Thats great the SL55 has some features that make it faster in a straight line but it is unlikely the SL 55 08 would keep up on the ring with this new 63.
As far as the 0-62 times looks like a .1 difference not the .2 the OP claimed.
In my mind many of the new features of the 63 are well worth the price of the car. Wonder if the C63 has this Launch control feature?
AMG has the 63 rated at 4.6s so there is a .1 difference 0-62mph not significant, while a few seconds on the ring will be.
your a drag *****, so you know better then that
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,952
Likes: 4
From: Hollywood CA
2011 twin turboed prius
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
SL/M6
Its a bad buy if you cant afford taking the loss and trading it in when the "real" new SL comes out. If money is not an option then I would rather drive an Aston, F-car, Maserati G.T., Bentley GTC etc. Personally as a current R230 owner who is moving on, I would rather sample a different brand and wait the few years until the new SL comes out instead of burying myself into a car which is on its last legs and is blatantly the same vehicle as the European 2002 model with a new front and and a few upgraded gadgets. Also the days of a 12 year bodystyle are gone to those who think otherwise. What sold me on my current SL and my previous one wasnt just the prestige, stunning/timeless design and incredible ride- it was also the heritage of the SL itself. Stunts like this frontal only redesign, whether it was due to the EU safety standards or due to less sales, dilute this heritage IMO.
