SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: I drove the SL63 today.....
Ted

I would say that the 63 likes revs in order to develop it's power. Whereas the 55, because of the SC makes lots of torque down low. On the stock 55s that we have done, the SC kicks in around 2K rpm. We dial it in to kick in at between 1400-1500 rpm, and broaden the power band, as well as flatten it, so that it feels more potent across the range, which is different to the way the 63 felt.
The launch cars come with the 030 package, so they have the safety car nose. It looked good, but I like the look of the old nose better. Perhaps, it will grow on me. But like I said, from a driving side the new gearbox and the suspension set up is brilliant and worth the switch.
I was amazing to me how much the AMG cars seem to continue to free fall in value every month since new. As I searched during the past months the cost of the SL65s seemed to plumet about $3,000-$4,000 per month or more!!.
This is baffling to me because the SL65 is a VERY EXCLUSIVE car at $195K with very LIMITED PRODUCTION (only 390 in 2006 less in 07) and with SUPER CAR PERFORMANCE (Ferrari, Lambo, Porsche Turbo).
By all rights the value of both the SL55 and SL65 should hold reasonably firm with only modest depreciation. This is not counting the standard huge hit most cars get the moment they drive off the lot for the first time.
It is absolutely amazing to me how a $195,000 car can drop over $105,000 in 1 1/2 years with only 4,000-8,000 miles on the clock, but there are lots of them out there.
It is not like it is some underfunded unknown car company that just burst on the scene with a new one off type car hell these are AMG Mercedes that have almost no resale value! Even the SLR is taking a hit, I dont get it...
Certainly no major cities in California - San Fran, SD, LA, OC... $150k+ cars are routine in all of those cities. The same obviously applies in major east coast cities. So in what major cities are $150k+ cars rarely spotted?
The Best of Mercedes & AMG



