SL55 AMG, SL63 AMG, SL65 AMG (R230) 2002 - 2011 (2003 US for SL55 and 2004 for the SL65)

SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: What would it take for the SL65 to trap 130??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 12:31 AM
  #26  
Thericker's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 20
From: Southern, CA.
V12-Biturbo
Originally Posted by TMC M5
You need to re-read what I said... 80-90 something degree heat with high humidity = bad trap speed. The DA's were 1,500+ft. Using calulators it would run 120+ at sea level. I can assure you that the stock E55's running 118+ were running in conditions at or below sea level. BTW RENNtech doesn't make a 730hp package...and no... a Z06 will not get "murdered" by a RENNtech SL65. The RENNtech SL65 should walk it above 140mph....but I would hardly call that a "murder". Do the same $12K of mod's to a Z06 and you would then have a crime scene....and the guys from CSI could make the call in a matter of seconds.

Tom
You nailed it Tom! It's really funny how many E55k guys think they can hit 117-118 mph STOCK It aint happenin' they don't realize these traps were hit @ Sea level tracks w/1400-1600-negative DA (Basically unreal NON average conditions or 1/4 tracks, most the tracks on the West coast are 1000 ft + above Sea Level) They in reality Trap 113-116 @ BEST bone stock.

Last edited by Thericker; Oct 5, 2008 at 12:35 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 11:44 AM
  #27  
TMC M5's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 53
From: Maryland
'14 E63S & '14 Audi SQ5
Originally Posted by Shaun
Dont need psychic powers to see you trapping close to that. Have you chosen a tunner yet.

I am going to do a custom tune with LET next week. We will see what it can do at the track the following Monday.

Tom
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 10:31 PM
  #28  
Improviz's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
CLS55 AMG
Using this calculator I come up w/790 crank

Using the popular Patrick Hale formula on this page gives 10.547 s @ 129.24 with 775 crank (using run weight of 4600 pounds).

I've found that this particular formula, which I first read about in R&T some years back, works pretty well if you use as-tested weight and trap speed, at hitting rated horsepower--except for the AMG cars, for some reason.

You can plug in a few traps/as-tested weights and see for yourself....

Btw, as the author notes, all of those things are far less accurate at predicting ET than they are at predicting traps.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 10:46 PM
  #29  
bfnnrgn's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 1
From: Dallas
SL65
My SL65 weighs 4630 lbs with me in it and a 1/2 tank of gas. I don't know where 4800lbs came from. I also took my car to the track in mid August and trapped 120 with a DA of 2680ft. It was 87 degrees and had been raining out earlier in the day so it was pretty humid. My car is stock.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 11:56 PM
  #30  
Improviz's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
CLS55 AMG
Originally Posted by bfnnrgn
My SL65 weighs 4630 lbs with me in it and a 1/2 tank of gas. I don't know where 4800lbs came from. I also took my car to the track in mid August and trapped 120 with a DA of 2680ft. It was 87 degrees and had been raining out earlier in the day so it was pretty humid. My car is stock.
Who said it weighed 4800? I used 4600 in the calculator, which is the weight including driver, which is actually lighter than your figure.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 11:59 PM
  #31  
bfnnrgn's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 1
From: Dallas
SL65
Originally Posted by Improviz
Who said it weighed 4800? I used 4600 in the calculator, which is the weight including driver, which is actually lighter than your figure.
Post 2 said 4800 lbs + driver.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 12:05 AM
  #32  
Improviz's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
CLS55 AMG
Originally Posted by bfnnrgn
Post 2 said 4800 lbs + driver.
Aww, crap, my bad! I searched for "4800" w/ctrl-f, but didn't think to search for "4,800"! Sorry 'bout that....
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 02:05 PM
  #33  
Marcus Frost's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 3
From: Chicago, IL
Real Cars
I'm sorry that I've been holding out on you guys, but I hope you all understand I wasn't in a position to speak.

https://mbworld.org/forums/showpost....8&postcount=15

I know the owner of this car personally, and it will go 130mph once they make a few final tweaks to the tune and IC setup. You heard it here first folks:

JUST TUNE AND COOLING WILL GET THESE 65s TO HIT 130MPH ON 93 OCTANE!!!

-m
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 04:48 PM
  #34  
jmf003's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 5
From: Ann Arbor
'03 SL55
Originally Posted by bfnnrgn
Post 2 said 4800 lbs + driver.
That'd be me. I didn't look up the weight but just guessed since I was calculating a raw order of magnitude time estimate rather than a precise number. Apologies for not providing more context on how I came up with the number.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 04:54 PM
  #35  
jmf003's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 5
From: Ann Arbor
'03 SL55
Originally Posted by Marcus Frost
I'm sorry that I've been holding out on you guys, but I hope you all understand I wasn't in a position to speak.

https://mbworld.org/forums/showpost....8&postcount=15

I know the owner of this car personally, and it will go 130mph once they make a few final tweaks to the tune and IC setup. You heard it here first folks:

JUST TUNE AND COOLING WILL GET THESE 65s TO HIT 130MPH ON 93 OCTANE!!!

-m
Nice work by Vadim and Victor! Your buddy must be very happy with the result.

So back to the original question, this car produced 578 rwhp and trapped 128 mph.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 09:05 PM
  #36  
sack5000's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,947
Likes: 8
From: Oklahoma City
2015 AMG C63 S
Originally Posted by Marcus Frost
zlicious,

I also caution how great of a deal you might think the SL65 is at $80k. This was a $200k car new, and fixing/servicing this car as well as parts have not depreciated with the car's value. It's also NOT a DIY friendly car like a Z06, not even close. You can't even bleed the freaking brakes on this car without a computer with special connector and software.

Just my $.02

-m
There are numerous SL65s available for $80-100K and they have low miles. What could be wrong, especially if the car has a CPO, with owning one? What causes the erratic depreciation?

Last edited by sack5000; Oct 16, 2008 at 09:17 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2008 | 01:50 PM
  #37  
Marcus Frost's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 3
From: Chicago, IL
Real Cars
Originally Posted by sack5000
There are numerous SL65s available for $80-100K and they have low miles. What could be wrong, especially if the car has a CPO, with owning one? What causes the erratic depreciation?
First off, CPO only covers the car for an additional year our of original warranty.

Additionally, I was referring to not necessarily warranty items, as much as maintenance items. Rotors for these cars are $800 a piece. Doing an SBC fluid flush will cost you around $700-$950. These aren't things you can assume are things you can yourself, either. These are just some examples, but the same kind of applies for the E55s too. E55s now are in the 40k range, and people think that wow, the car is cheap, but when a maintenance bill or an out of warranty issue comes up, they have sticker shock. The price to maintain these cars does not deperciate, in fact as they get older, it obviously increases.

-m
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2008 | 02:47 PM
  #38  
TMC M5's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 53
From: Maryland
'14 E63S & '14 Audi SQ5
Originally Posted by Marcus Frost
First off, CPO only covers the car for an additional year our of original warranty.

Additionally, I was referring to not necessarily warranty items, as much as maintenance items. Rotors for these cars are $800 a piece. Doing an SBC fluid flush will cost you around $700-$950. These aren't things you can assume are things you can yourself, either. These are just some examples, but the same kind of applies for the E55s too. E55s now are in the 40k range, and people think that wow, the car is cheap, but when a maintenance bill or an out of warranty issue comes up, they have sticker shock. The price to maintain these cars does not deperciate, in fact as they get older, it obviously increases.

-m
Yup...maintenance wise ..it is still a near $200K car. Just the rear pads from the dealer were quoted at $460...ouch.


Originally Posted by Marcus Frost
You heard it here first folks:

JUST TUNE AND COOLING WILL GET THESE 65s TO HIT 130MPH ON 93 OCTANE!!!

Nope....I heard it first from the owner himself.

Tom
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2008 | 04:13 AM
  #39  
MB Fanatic's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 1
From: South Orange County, CA
4 wheels
Originally Posted by Zlicious
Got ya. Thanks guys.

I am still hoping to hear from modded 65 owners..
Hey, my dad has a 2008 S65 (non modded) but to be honest, you will have a hell of a hard time getting into the 130's in terms of mph. Its down right difficult, and what Marcus said the aftermarket isn't that developed due to the low demand of the 65 series cars.

Now once I get my SL65 BS I will let you know of what it is capable and after Vadim has a crack at it.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2008 | 01:40 AM
  #40  
gripforce-cl65's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Fast cars in general....
I had both modded CL65 (559whp) and 08 Z06 (591whp). From my experience, I doubt any 65 will ever come close to Z in a straight line performance stock or modded. I have many videos to prove this. From roll ons, the stock Z put 559whp CL65 about 3-4 cars behind. When the Z was modded to 591whp, then it did put a few bus lengths. IMO, 591whp Z (spent 8K in mods) can 'murder' any 65. I'm sure your 530whp Z can put any modded 65 to shame.

Last edited by gripforce-cl65; Oct 22, 2008 at 03:56 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2008 | 02:08 AM
  #41  
Addicted2Speed's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 1
From: Miami, FL
Lotus Elise SLK55
VRP tuned CL65 just trapped 129mph with ecu, intercoolers, and intake. Since SL65 is lighter, it would have no problem trapping over 130mph with the aforementioned mods, which are pretty much simple bolt-on upgrades.

https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/266173-vrp-d-cl65-goes-10-97-129mph.html
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 04:37 PM
  #42  
Busa196's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 445
Likes: 26
From: USA
2018 S63, lowered
I agree with most of you on the straight-line drag race, on the track, with a stock Z and a stock SL65.....but, having owned 3 high rwhp Vettes (440, 550, 600) I'm here to tell you that I think my stock S65 would out run, or nearly out run all of them on the street in a quarter mile....."street" I say.

My 65 is absolutely nasty from a dig......any high HP Vette (especially a MN6 Vette) is going to have serious traction issues from 1-2nd...possibly 3rd.

I've ran the scenario in my head a thousand times- my 600rwhp auto C6 with a 3200 stall against my stock 65....both on street tires, and both from a dig on the street-... my 65 wins in a .25mile as the Vette smokes the 345's on the rear all the way to third and is a **** to control/maintain a straight line......

Get some over anxious rookie in a Vette against my auto, heavy-*** 740ft lbs of torque 65 and he'll struggle to catch me in any "reasonable" distance.......again, IMO and speaking from personal experience.

I reiterate, on the track or with any decent traction on the Vette, the Z wins everytime.....but for short blasts on the street, from a dig, I'll take my 65 any day of the week
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2008 | 08:35 PM
  #43  
BenzBoy12's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 568
Likes: 1
1988 535i 5 speed
Originally Posted by Addicted2Speed
VRP tuned CL65 just trapped 129mph with ecu, intercoolers, and intake. Since SL65 is lighter, it would have no problem trapping over 130mph with the aforementioned mods, which are pretty much simple bolt-on upgrades.

https://mbworld.org/forums/showthread.php?t=266173
Actually, I think the Sl almost weighs more than than the CL, especially if you're talking a 215. That hard top weighs a ton. But yeah it def. shouldn't take over 800 at the wheels to crack 130, even with a 2500 or 3000 DA.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2008 | 10:48 PM
  #44  
Thericker's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 20
From: Southern, CA.
V12-Biturbo
Originally Posted by BenzBoy12
Actually, I think the Sl almost weighs more than than the CL, especially if you're talking a 215. That hard top weighs a ton. But yeah it def. shouldn't take over 800 at the wheels to crack 130, even with a 2500 or 3000 DA.
Wrong the CL 215 weight is 4700-4900 lbs the SL 600/65 weigh 4500lbs

& the new CL weigh nearly the same as the out going 215, this has been discussed to death, as well as documented in many magazines & actual track hounds weighing both vehicles...

Last edited by Thericker; Oct 30, 2008 at 10:53 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2008 | 11:22 PM
  #45  
BenzBoy12's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 568
Likes: 1
1988 535i 5 speed
reallyy? I musta read the weights wrong somewhere. Or I just got the numbers mixed up in my head, lol. I thought the SL was heavier.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 10:18 AM
  #46  
TMC M5's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 53
From: Maryland
'14 E63S & '14 Audi SQ5
Originally Posted by Thericker
Wrong the CL 215 weight is 4700-4900 lbs the SL 600/65 weigh 4500lbs

& the new CL weigh nearly the same as the out going 215, this has been discussed to death, as well as documented in many magazines & actual track hounds weighing both vehicles...
The W215 CL65 weighs 4,654bs
http://www.intellichoice.com/reports...edes-Benz/CL65


The W216 CL65 weighs 4,940lbs
http://www.intellichoice.com/reports...edes-Benz/CL65

I did see that they said the 2008 CL65 was 4,599lbs... clearly they weren't using the right figure because the 2009 CL65 didn't just gain 350lbs overnight. The W216 CL65 hasn't been tested in any US mags but it has been tested in European magazines. All those magazines publish the weight at nearly 2,300kgs (almost 5,000lbs) whereas the W215 CL65 was always around 2,100kgs.

Tom
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 11:33 AM
  #47  
MarkoCL65's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
CL65
Originally Posted by gripforce-cl65
I had both modded CL65 (559whp) and 08 Z06 (591whp). From my experience, I doubt any 65 will ever come close to Z in a straight line performance stock or modded. I have many videos to prove this. From roll ons, the stock Z put 559whp CL65 about 3-4 cars behind. When the Z was modded to 591whp, then it did put a few bus lengths. IMO, 591whp Z (spent 8K in mods) can 'murder' any 65. I'm sure your 530whp Z can put any modded 65 to shame.
Your results would have been more positive (CL65) if you had a better cooling system. (or if it was cold out) The ECU pulls massive amounts of timing as soon as IAT's rise. You could be down 100 HP at the moment easily, and not notice. Oh, and I would step up to try that 530whp Z at the track or 0 (or any speed for that matter) to 200mph. I've put bus lengths on stock Z's.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 11:49 AM
  #48  
BenzBoy12's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 568
Likes: 1
1988 535i 5 speed
Originally Posted by TMC M5
The W215 CL65 weighs 4,654bs
http://www.intellichoice.com/reports...edes-Benz/CL65


The W216 CL65 weighs 4,940lbs
http://www.intellichoice.com/reports...edes-Benz/CL65

I did see that they said the 2008 CL65 was 4,599lbs... clearly they weren't using the right figure because the 2009 CL65 didn't just gain 350lbs overnight. The W216 CL65 hasn't been tested in any US mags but it has been tested in European magazines. All those magazines publish the weight at nearly 2,300kgs (almost 5,000lbs) whereas the W215 CL65 was always around 2,100kgs.

Tom
Those numbers sound right, that's what I remember reading, that the new one is damn close to 5k pounds. But somehow handles better too.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 12:19 PM
  #49  
Fikse's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
STS,FGT,12C,P85D,M4
I've seen a 2005 CL65 on a digital scale, was 4460......




Originally Posted by TMC M5
The W215 CL65 weighs 4,654bs
http://www.intellichoice.com/reports...edes-Benz/CL65


The W216 CL65 weighs 4,940lbs
http://www.intellichoice.com/reports...edes-Benz/CL65

I did see that they said the 2008 CL65 was 4,599lbs... clearly they weren't using the right figure because the 2009 CL65 didn't just gain 350lbs overnight. The W216 CL65 hasn't been tested in any US mags but it has been tested in European magazines. All those magazines publish the weight at nearly 2,300kgs (almost 5,000lbs) whereas the W215 CL65 was always around 2,100kgs.

Tom
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:18 AM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE