SL55 AMG, SL63 AMG, SL65 AMG (R230) 2002 - 2011 (2003 US for SL55 and 2004 for the SL65)

SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: SL63 vs 09' Porsche 911 Turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-01-2009, 04:37 PM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
transferred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OC, SoCal
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 S65, 06 M3 CS(stick), 02 BMW X5 4.6iS, 07 R1 Raven, 08 F-450 4x4, 08 CooperS JCW
Originally Posted by speed doc
I always laugh when I see people talk about what's faster on the track. Do you drive on a track every day? The track is a whole different situation than real world driving in my opinion. I wouldn't base my ownership choice on track lap times for the cars. Drive both and see what you like. I had an 07 911tt, and traded on a sl55. It was a better fit for me. Comfortable, hard top convertible yet with enough "sports car" to embarass 99% of the cars on the road when need be. Both are great cars, it's what fits you best. Have fun.
Then you are missing the point...track times of indicative of overall handling, chassis and braking competence...these are vital categories for all performance cars in the real world.

The rest of your post is hard to argue with...the SL is undoubtedly a great car and a very capable one.

-Rob
Old 04-01-2009, 09:08 PM
  #27  
Administrator

 
Vic55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes on 495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
Originally Posted by photonut
i just got a new sl63 last week. black/black/carbon fiber trim. i have only 100 miles on it and i would like to trade it for a 911 turbo cab. the sl63 is a great car, but i had an sl55 for 5 years and i am ready for a change! i would be willing to sell the SL63 for $120,000.00
Not defending any cars resale value but for perspective, here are the recent 2009 SL63 sales at Manheim:

02/27/09 RIVRSIDE Factory $99,500 1,628 Avg BLACK 8G A Yes
02/27/09 RIVRSIDE Factory $99,000 2,393 Avg BLACK 8G A Yes
02/27/09 RIVRSIDE Factory $97,250 519 Avg BLACK 8G A Yes
03/10/09 W PALM Regular $109,000 839 Above WHITE 8G A Yes
03/20/09 RIVRSIDE Factory $110,250 1,250 Above ALB WHT 8G A No
03/27/09 RIVRSIDE Factory $104,500 2,725 Avg STEELGRY 8G A Yes
03/27/09 RIVRSIDE Factory $97,500 8,641 Avg BLACK 8G A Yes
Old 04-01-2009, 11:20 PM
  #28  
Member
 
dave3191's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL55 AMG S55 AMG Hummer H2
Talking

Originally Posted by dave3191
Porsche is a great car, had one myself years ago, but personally I'm stuck on AMG's and have been for many years now! Currently I have two, a SL55 and S55 and if you have driven both the SL63 and the 911-T you can certainly feel the all around difference between the two! So my vote would be for the SL63.... But it's all up to you!!!
Like I said early on in this thread, most definitely the SL over the 911-T any day and everyday without question!!!
Old 04-02-2009, 08:46 AM
  #29  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Originally Posted by Sunir
When you talk about sports cars vs. Grand tourers and the like, you are catagorizing based on purpose and performance. The later of the two can only be sorted on a track of some sort, under similar conditions, and in a controlled environment. We're not talking highways or street, that's not an accurate theater to judge performance objectively. For example, anybody can build a 1000hp Job Spetter turbo mustang with 10.5" M/T Street et's and trounce an SL-anything on a highway, that's not a test of performance is it?

This said I like my SL55 a lot, it's fast, fun, it has a hard top convertible, feels good to drive on the road and highways etc...I'm not undermining SL's, I like them, I own one!! But it is not a sportscar, plain and simple. It is a very heavy, big engine, boulevard and/or high speed highway cruiser with a cool hardtop that comes down - it does what it was meant to do very well, so it serves its purpose and it is a great car, but in terms of performance as a sportscar there are better alternatives in the same or lower price range.
I think if you drive the SL63 you will find it quite different to a SL55.
The whole car feels better planted, much more info through the steering
wheel.Completely different power delivery, proper 7 speed dsg tranny.
It's much more like a sports car and less like a GT car, in fact I was worried
it may be too raw, luckily it is still comfortable, and the sound...to die for.
Old 04-02-2009, 11:00 AM
  #30  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Sunir's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL55 AMG
Originally Posted by sound 8
I think if you drive the SL63 you will find it quite different to a SL55.
The whole car feels better planted, much more info through the steering
wheel.Completely different power delivery, proper 7 speed dsg tranny.
It's much more like a sports car and less like a GT car, in fact I was worried
it may be too raw, luckily it is still comfortable, and the sound...to die for.
I'd love to play with a the all new SL63 on track ....MB club (our local chapter) holds 2 track events at Summit Point and one at VIR, maybe I'll have a student or two with the car! Would love to check out it's braking, handling, and transition characteristics... looking forward to it
Old 04-03-2009, 02:32 PM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Originally Posted by Sunir
I'd love to play with a the all new SL63 on track ....MB club (our local chapter) holds 2 track events at Summit Point and one at VIR, maybe I'll have a student or two with the car! Would love to check out it's braking, handling, and transition characteristics... looking forward to it
Hi, I didn't buy the SL63 for track days, but I bet it would spank the SL55
on the track, very similar in a straight line though.
I have NEVER had a car that has aroused so much attention, my SL55 got a few looks and my CL65 got one or two at most, I think the reason for buying
the CL65 was to own the most powerful 4 seat production car ever made,
plus only 20 were sold in the UK.
Old 04-03-2009, 03:05 PM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Sunir's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL55 AMG
Originally Posted by sound 8
Hi, I didn't buy the SL63 for track days, but I bet it would spank the SL55
on the track, very similar in a straight line though.
I have NEVER had a car that has aroused so much attention, my SL55 got a few looks and my CL65 got one or two at most, I think the reason for buying
the CL65 was to own the most powerful 4 seat production car ever made,
plus only 20 were sold in the UK.
I wouldn't really take my SL55 on track, unless I was instructing at an MB club track day or something...to me it makes a great street/highway car; good for nice summer nights with the top down etc...gobs of power for exhileraiting bursts of torque goodness

For track I'd use my race car, purpose built E36 M3L touring car
Old 04-04-2009, 09:01 AM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Originally Posted by Sunir
I wouldn't really take my SL55 on track, unless I was instructing at an MB club track day or something...to me it makes a great street/highway car; good for nice summer nights with the top down etc...gobs of power for exhileraiting bursts of torque goodness

For track I'd use my race car, purpose built E36 M3L touring car
The only thing I miss is the torque, however I would not take my MB on
a track, however I would love to drive a proper track car.
Old 04-06-2009, 01:10 AM
  #34  
Banned
 
Akademiks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL600
Originally Posted by carcommander
I guess everyone is entitled to their opionion. Go drive a turbo they are not close. For one thing the Turbo wieghts 3500 pounds. I love my SL but it is a GT. The Turbo is also faster. I had a Turbo walk my SL55 at 80mph plus. Don't pull up next to any Turbo's and try them with your SL63. It will yank the paint off it.
A 65 would walk your 997 Turbo Sorry.
Old 04-06-2009, 08:02 AM
  #35  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Originally Posted by Akademiks
A 65 would walk your 997 Turbo Sorry.
Close maybe, but the Porsche would win!! The 65 is in need of some updating.
The Porsche is also 4 wheel drive, the 65 just lights up the tyres.
Old 04-06-2009, 09:36 AM
  #36  
Banned
 
Akademiks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL600
Originally Posted by sound 8
Close maybe, but the Porsche would win!! The 65 is in need of some updating.
The Porsche is also 4 wheel drive, the 65 just lights up the tyres.
In thinking about it, you got stock 65s running mid 11s. Let's see what happens against a S65 vs. 997 Turbo. Seems to me "Carcommander" over there needs to have his SL65 checked out, considering he says the "Turbo is faster,"... the SL is faster then the S.
Old 04-06-2009, 04:29 PM
  #37  
Member
 
carcommander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2014 SL550
Originally Posted by Akademiks
A 65 would walk your 997 Turbo Sorry.
Hmmm, My quote said an SL55 I know that for a fact. I had one walk my 55. Would my SL65 take my Turbo? Not from a standstill It would be close from 60 on. Hard to say. Apparently not. From a 60mph roll the turbo walked from my 55. Looks like my 65 would take the turbo. Bench racing is fun.

Last edited by carcommander; 04-06-2009 at 04:35 PM.
Old 04-06-2009, 08:10 PM
  #38  
Banned
 
Akademiks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL600
Originally Posted by carcommander
Hmmm, My quote said an SL55 I know that for a fact. I had one walk my 55. Would my SL65 take my Turbo? Not from a standstill It would be close from 60 on. Hard to say. Apparently not. From a 60mph roll the turbo walked from my 55. Looks like my 65 would take the turbo. Bench racing is fun.
And yet strangely here you say:

Originally Posted by carcommander
I love my SL but it is a GT. The Turbo is also faster.
Your quote said you love your SL, and *you* drive an SL65 according to your profile.

Whilst it's true you did say, "I had a Turbo walk my SL55...", that was after the aforementioned quote... So which is it, do you have an SL55 or SL65? Or... both...?
Old 04-07-2009, 07:18 AM
  #39  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Originally Posted by Akademiks
In thinking about it, you got stock 65s running mid 11s. Let's see what happens against a S65 vs. 997 Turbo. Seems to me "Carcommander" over there needs to have his SL65 checked out, considering he says the "Turbo is faster,"... the SL is faster then the S.
In theory the lightest 65 should be the quickest, so SL65,CL65or S65.
Which is it?
Old 04-07-2009, 08:58 AM
  #40  
Member
 
carcommander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2014 SL550
Originally Posted by Akademiks
And yet strangely here you say:



Your quote said you love your SL, and *you* drive an SL65 according to your profile.

Whilst it's true you did say, "I had a Turbo walk my SL55...", that was after the aforementioned quote... So which is it, do you have an SL55 or SL65? Or... both...?
I have had a lot of cars. I had an 05 SL55 which I really liked. I sold it and bought an SL65 a few months ago. I have not had an opportunity to run my SL65 against a turbo. I also own a turbo but sometimes seat of the pants numbers are misleading.
Old 04-07-2009, 09:34 AM
  #41  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Originally Posted by carcommander
I have had a lot of cars. I had an 05 SL55 which I really liked. I sold it and bought an SL65 a few months ago. I have not had an opportunity to run my SL65 against a turbo. I also own a turbo but sometimes seat of the pants numbers are misleading.
I test drove a SL65 but found it too stodgy, very quiet and comfortable though, I preferred my SL55, not as fast but more sporty. If you find a new
Turbo I think it will be close, unless it's a windy road, then the Turbo will
definitely have the edge, in a straight line? I await the result.
Old 04-07-2009, 02:51 PM
  #42  
Banned
 
Akademiks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL600
Originally Posted by sound 8
In theory the lightest 65 should be the quickest, so SL65,CL65or S65.
Which is it?
I searched quickly on google and here's the result (in lbs):

CL - 4500
S - 5035
SL - 4506

So... consider a S65 took the 997 Turbo in the video posted above, I'd say the CL and SL can beat it even worse. Just going by with weight of course.
Old 04-09-2009, 02:35 PM
  #43  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Originally Posted by Akademiks
I searched quickly on google and here's the result (in lbs):

CL - 4500
S - 5035
SL - 4506

So... consider a S65 took the 997 Turbo in the video posted above, I'd say the CL and SL can beat it even worse. Just going by with weight of course.
Wow, I thought the SL would be the heaviest.
I am intrigued, so I am going to book a test drive in a Porsche Turbo, I will
post my comments sometime in about a week.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: SL63 vs 09' Porsche 911 Turbo



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:45 AM.