SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Out of a 996 Turbo and into an SL55 - First Impressions... (long!)
Peter,
Perhaps you should read the thread again, but this time, start from the beginning.
More importantly, I have understood what I have read, while some folks apparently have not.
My experience is that neither is the 993 build quality as amazing as some have claimed, nor is the 996 as poor. My 993's all rattled much more, had squeaky windshields...etc. My SL600 has more problems than I care to list.
My point is that build quality comments are so absurdly subjective UNLESS you are citing statics. For example, someone I know not very well complained to me about the feel of his brand new 996 c2. I went over and checked the tire pressures -- they were each 10lbs over inflated -- he might as well be driving on stones. So while I am all for people citing recalls etc... Build quality talk has and always will be deceptive, the kind of talk that gets repeated and becomes "fact" much like the belief so many people have that the Porsche 996 GT2 is a death mobile that requires Damon Hill to successfully drive it to the corner store.
Now as for SL55 vs. 996TT -- I think compairsons are silly given the totally different goals of each car. And while I appreciate the Hoeckheim stat, 4 seconds on that track is indicative of a lot more than you make it sound.
The SL55 is in my opinion the best MB to date and an awesome GT. Having driven it a lot, I agree it is absolutley one of the best all-around daily drivers. I completely believe anyone who buys a Porsche Turbo should be buying it because they want to really drive it hard. You are not even beginning to understand the car if you don't have it at high speed in twisting mountain roads. I think the person who started this thread made a smart choice for himself -- however the one thing I found decpetive in his original post was the implicit point that it was the Turbo that didn't live up to his expectation. I think the truth is he didn't know what it was a Turbo was for -- certainly this is true if in 6 months of ownership it saw 120mph once. I don't know a single person who has been in a Turbo and doesn't open it up somewhere at least once a week! I see 120 anytime I have a stretch of open road and no police!
One buys a Porsche ideally to drive it on open roads in a spirited fashion. They can drive it around town, but it feels like using a race horse to pull a carriage. One buys an SL55 to have a car they can drive around town, and can take up to a healthy speed in a straight line. You can take it on the twisties, it does very well, but doesn't handle like a true sports car. And by that I mean feel, feedback...etc. Not just performance.
So I guess what I'm saying is where I think Porsche owners find some of these orginal remarks obnoxious is because they suggest that the SL55's virtues are more virtuous, instead of saying "hey, for what I do in a car, this is SO much better" Not everyone wants ANY radio in their car. And some people think seats which massage you are big heavy wastes of weight. Others think any car with two seats is obnoxious, as are any cars that get less than 30mpg.
I love the SL55 and would get one if it were not for the 360 Spyder, which satisfies more of my desires in a drop-top car. Does that mean a 360 Spyder is better than an SL55? I don't know. Which would you rather have?
There is no better in cars - just different. I think it is enough to just say "I love my new SL55 more than I did my Turbo". You don't have to try and justify it, really.
And as for the discussion about water-cooled vs air cooled, a few things: 1) You are throwing around emissions like it is some silly requirement. It is the LAW. If a water-cooled engine allows for greater legal performance then what is your point? Porsche should have ignored the law and ended up with illegal cars? 2) The 996 frame is light-years ahead of the 993 frame -- Totally cutting edge chasis with an entirely new manufacturing process which has since been copied by automakers you all know and love. 3) 996 cars out-lap, out-last, and out-run comparable 993 cars. 4) 996 water-cooled engines have a much more versatile platform from which to upgrade, and all of the upper limits of the engines are greatly improved. 5) The "sound" of the air-cooled engines on a Turbo has nothing to do with the fact that they were air-cooled.
I have a suspicion that you are the contemplative alter-ego of the pedantic "Some Pete Guy". My thanks for tying together the beginning of the thread with the tangential discussion concerning Porsche build quality.
I rattled the cages of a Porsche forum when I announced my disappointment with the Turbo and suggested trading it for an SL55. It received the highest number of responses in the forum’s history and clearly I’d hit a nerve.
I’m looking around me thinking this is great but, why in 2002 have I got a f**king cassette slot in the middle of my dashboard.
Then it started – I read review after review preaching the virtues of the SL55 – the complete car.
Thing is, I reckon most people who buy Turbos, just like me, buy them for their heritage, status and looks – and the driving experience simply doesn’t meet the lifestyle. However hard Porsche tries by fitting tiptronic transmission, parking bleepers, sat nav and the like, it will never satisfy a town driver like an SL55 can.
So let me compare experiences;
I don’t care about official times – the SL55’s power is so useable due to the auto box that it seems twice as quick as the Porsche. The torque is incredible. I’ve only experienced anything like this in a Bentley Turbo, it’s the same feeling. The momentum generated is like a power station off the blocks. Awesome.
In any event Porsches accelrate faster, brake faster, corner faster, and do so with much more driver feel.
Don’t even think about comparing comfort. Everything you’d expect from a luxury car that Porsche can only dream or bull**** about.
Porsche obviously wins on handling – you really feel the car but the Merc is still special. Bottom line is that it’s good enough for anyone unless you’re going to chuck it around the track.
There’s one aspect that maybe sums it up. 3 months after buying the Porsche I got invited by my Porsche dealer to a track day. ‘Sure’ I said, what cars will you have. ‘Bring your own’ he said! So Porsche invites you to a track day where you thrash hell out of your car and then call them a week later to sort out the tires, brakes etc. etc. 3 weeks after buying my Merc I get a limited edition hardback book inviting me to a what looks like a fantastic day out where I get to use their AMG’s to learn how to drive mine properly.
You can see why Porsche has developed the Cayenne. They need a luxurious comfortable car for people like me. And I’m not rare, I represent the majority of Porsche buyers. We love the brand and want a piece of it but the days of dressing up
In the meantime, I get to drive home in the traffic, watch the evening news, get a massage and talk to my phone to dial my wife to tell her to put the dinner in the over. In the Porsche the only thing that hurt more on the way home than my back was my wallet.
Anyway, I hope you aren't so distracted by your gadgets that you hit someone. I'm sorry you have a bad back, probably good thing you gave up the Turbo, might have hurt yourself doing a high-G turn and you won't have to worry about that in your MB. Still, you have one of the best cars in the world in an SL55, so try to enjoy it without the need to put other cars down with specious arguements. And if you ever feel the need to figure out why some crazy loons out there actually like a Porsche more, find one of them and let them take you for a drive, maybe then you will appreciate the Porsche as well.
I'll add this PS : Try cooking FOR your wife every now and then, rather then being proud of your ability to call her up and tell her what's what
Last edited by deanger; Feb 19, 2003 at 06:15 PM.
Damn, I'm good. I should have been a psychiatrist.
I sure hope no one is going around saying the love the SL55 because of its snob appeal. It is far to good a car for that.
Dean
I sure hope no one is going around saying the love the SL55 because of its snob appeal. It is far to good a car for that.
So what do you think, 2005 997 or 2005 Aston Martin DB8? AM is promising quite a bit, I guess we'll have to see if it turns out to be more of a sports car or GT cruiser.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
P.S. Enjoy the cars for what they are, each is different. Just drove my firend's '02 Porsche Turbo, nothing more exhilarating than that feeling of accelaration as if a rocket is attched to your butt. 0-114 in 3rd gear without even being close to redline and feeling rock solid like you are only doing 60. (Then drove his M5, which felt like a dog thoiugh it really isn't). Porshe, Ferrari, and AMG MB are all different. Variety is the spice of life.
Last edited by theine; Feb 20, 2003 at 08:13 AM.
So what do you think, 2005 997 or 2005 Aston Martin DB8? AM is promising quite a bit, I guess we'll have to see if it turns out to be more of a sports car or GT cruiser.



