SL55 AMG, SL63 AMG, SL65 AMG (R230) 2002 - 2011 (2003 US for SL55 and 2004 for the SL65)

SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: TOOK IN ON TRADE TODAY: 2004 SL600.. MY IMPRESSION

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-29-2009, 12:24 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
bryanc4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 sl55
TOOK IN ON TRADE TODAY: 2004 SL600.. MY IMPRESSION

solid car, lots of torque, very smooth.. but not nearly as much 'fun' and cooperative as the SL55 which i felt was more responsive and sporty.

the sl600 feels heavier and more stable that the SL55, and the turbo lag while minimal still exists. it feels like the turbos are undertuned.. as if they lack *****... has anybody chipped one of these and if yes hows the difference?

overall, if i had to choose between the sl600 and the sl55 id probably go with the sl55 just because it has a more stylish appearance with the quad pipes and the AMG emblems in/out. horsepower feels about the same.

pros: torque torque torque.. smoother ride

cons: weak exhaust sound, slight turbo lag.

Last edited by bryanc4; 09-29-2009 at 12:27 AM.
Old 09-29-2009, 01:16 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mac911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C300 Sport/Palladium Silver on Black/P2
Are you disappointed you swapped cars then ?

I hope you enjoy the 600.
Old 09-29-2009, 10:41 AM
  #3  
Super Member
 
FLSL55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: South Florida
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
SL65
I think he is a dealer...
Old 09-29-2009, 11:35 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Ferri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2011 Hyundai Elantra GLS
So you swapped a 2006 for a 2004?
Old 09-29-2009, 12:20 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
IngenereAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
SL55AMG, Ferrari 348, Ferrari Testarossa, Ferrari F40, Ferrari Mondial t, Ducati 916, Indycar
Every 600 that we have tuned becomes very fast, but the 600 chassis is just not as well set up for performance driving as compared to the 55.

If you are a 'driver', the choice is the SL55 AMG!
Old 09-29-2009, 02:06 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
bryanc4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 sl55
i am indeed a dealer.. i drove my 06 sl55 for 7 months.. loved it.. i posted an ad on autotrader as we have an acccount with unlimited car postings.. $45k.. didnt think anybody would bite... sure enough 7 months later this german dude walks in with 45k cash no haggles no negotiations and takes it down... its one of only few cars ive ever been attached to.... so it had to be replaced.... and it has beenj!

my sl600 is truly bad ****.. 20 inch assantis (tasteful wheels not the nasty types if you know what i mean), pana, push, keyless, active cruise, ventilated, tint.. 37,000 miles.... clean carfax 2 owner.. PRISTINE condition.. took it in for $39,000.
Old 09-29-2009, 02:55 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Originally Posted by bryanc4
solid car, lots of torque, very smooth.. but not nearly as much 'fun' and cooperative as the SL55 which i felt was more responsive and sporty.

the sl600 feels heavier and more stable that the SL55, and the turbo lag while minimal still exists. it feels like the turbos are undertuned.. as if they lack *****... has anybody chipped one of these and if yes hows the difference?

overall, if i had to choose between the sl600 and the sl55 id probably go with the sl55 just because it has a more stylish appearance with the quad pipes and the AMG emblems in/out. horsepower feels about the same.

pros: torque torque torque.. smoother ride

cons: weak exhaust sound, slight turbo lag.
I had the same experience, when I had the SL55 I test drove the SL65, more
powerful than the 600 but the same engine.
It felt heavy, very smooth and very quiet.
My 55 in comparison felt lighter more agile, more fun, better exhaust note.
Even the sales guy who drove my 55 for a part ex price said he preferred it
to the 65. I think the 65 is the ultimate long distant cruiser though.
Old 09-29-2009, 04:16 PM
  #8  
Banned
 
Akademiks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL600
I had a totally different experience, but whatever floats your boat
Old 09-30-2009, 08:12 AM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Originally Posted by Akademiks
I had a totally different experience, but whatever floats your boat
I agree, it would be boring if we all preferred the same thing, plus there
would be nothing to talk ( argue) about.
Old 09-30-2009, 07:54 PM
  #10  
Member
 
carcommander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2014 SL550
My SL65 is a beast compared to my SL55. I guess it depends on what you like.
Floods of endless torque and power. Niether is a balarina.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: TOOK IN ON TRADE TODAY: 2004 SL600.. MY IMPRESSION



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:33 AM.