SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Auxilliary fuel pump rattle
Of course, I will not accept this in a new M-B.
Has anyone had a similar experience?
I thought it was a metal shield around the exhaust system that might need some bending, but I would like it to go away.
The car is perfect except for that rattle.
AMGBENZ
2003 SL55 AMG (700 Miles)
2000 ML430 (48000 Miles)
Last night, for the first time, I pressed the accelerator all the way to the floor.
I just completed my 900 mile break-in perioc (I know it's supposed to be 1,000 miles, but what's another 100 miles going to add?).
Surprisingly, for the very first time since buying the vehicle 3 weeks ago, the rattle is now gone!
Perhaps the engine demanding maximum fuel for the first time somehow settled the rattle from the auxilliary fuel pump.
I am curious to know if this would solve your problem.
Thanks Breeze
2003 SL 54 1/2
Last edited by Breeze; Mar 19, 2003 at 01:40 AM.
The senior mechanic at my M-B dealer just returned from a training session in Jacksonville and learned that this is a known problem (source: auxilliary fuel pump unique to SL-55) without a solution.
Trending Topics
MRI Doc, did you fix the rattle yet?
AMGBENZ
2003 SL55 AMG (rock solid at 140MPH)
2000 ML430
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
MY dealer was just told by MB to install a new gas tank to take care of the rattle. Did anyone do this yet and did it solve the problem? Now the wait to get the tank in.
Im told the part is "back ordered in germany" - i.e germany are waiting for new supplies - so I imagine theres a load of these being done across the world.
Mine turns into a squeal like noise when the car and outside temp. are cold for a few minutes. I guess the aux fuel pump runs under those circumstances. Normally it just becomes a ticking noise. I imagine it probably squeals a bit when under full throttle when that aux pump is working hard .. but Im only listening to the engine then :-)
R




has anyone had this changed in the US yet? just frustrating to buy a car so expensive and have quirks like this...
My personal point of view is that overall, Mercedes quality has actually improved significantly. Maybe the quality attitude is like the notion that everything was better in the "old days".
Having driven just about every Mercedes since '79 I have seen a lot more quality related issues before. Cars rusting in three years, air suspensions loosing pressure, window motors and switches going out, serious brake issues, loosing oil pressure and countless air conditioning problems.
For sure, all cars represent the best in manufacturing capabilities of their day, but I remember seeing a lot more quality issues that could impact driving safety. Quite a few (clearly not all) of the issues today I would rank as annoyance issues.
In regards to what and what should not happen to an expensive car, I suggest to look at the track record (and costs) of other expensive cars, let's say for the first 50k miles/5years: Ferrari, RR, Aston Martin, Lambo and Porsche.
Wolfman
This is not about you b4chow and maybe I am just getting annoyed by some of the messages in these forums where people complain about having issues with "expensive" cars experiencing problems and how Mercedes quality is going "downhill".
My view about this is similar to Wolfman - we shouldnt forget that the cars are complex pieces of machinery full of electronics, in very harsh environments for electronics. The fuel tank issue is no problem afaik, MB are doing the right thing, and if anyone notices/cares about the noise of petrol in the tank then they replace the tank. You can be sure that most manafacturers would say "thats petrol, its liquid, it sloshes sometimes or you can hear the fuel pump sometimes" and send you home.
Remember that the cars are new (the Sl55 fuel tank is unique to the SL55) and without hundreds of cars out there driven thousands of miles in real world - you can be sure that there will be noises and squeaks that do develop.
Provided they fix the more anoying ones I'm quite happy, and put the fixes into the production line thats even better.
My SL quality is better than my last CLK. Its also considerably quieter than my R129 SL
Ive been a bit unlucky with failures (see fault thread) but my dealer has been great,. diagnosed things quickly and offered me loan cars etc (which I dont tend to bother with) and fixed everything properly first time.
My wife's ML has been 100% - my VW Golf has broken about the same amount of times as the SL - not quite the same service from VW as from MB by a long way !
Cheers
Richard
i do expect there to be some faults with new cars, that's why when you buy the newest models, you should expect unforseen problems.
i do not mind cars having problems (granted they are not serious), but what pisses me off the most is bad service that sometimes the dealers provide you. i do not expect everything to be perfect just because i paid so much money for it, but i do expect top notch service for the price i paid.
am i surpose to get a whatever update taken care of my Oct built SL? why would i have this problem???
thanks for the heads up though!
2nd trip, first time was in Septemember. Following posts on this forum and others I had come to believe that a new gas tank would solve the problem and that one could be obtained. I was wrong.
I was told that I have been added to a list of owners in the USA with the noisy fuel pump problem. I am number 15. Supposedly, AMG is taking the position that this "isn't a safety issue" and "you have to expect some issues with a high performance car". MBUSA has been contacted about this and they are saying that they have no way to force AMG to deal with this. Supposedly AMG is "considering" a run of new gas tanks but they have made no commitment yet.
I am NOT happy with this response.
Not so good with the noisy fuel pump. As posted before AMG is dragging their heels on this. I am number 15 on a US waiting list. Managed to confirm that every SL55 has the fuel pump rattle one way or another. Louder in some than others.
I'm going to keep fighting for a new tank.



