SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Which is best
or older low mileage cars.
I think dealers generally go on age, but I do like low mileage cars.
Of course with warranty if possible.
Having said that, I prefer low mileage CPO vehicles when they can be found
I guess what I mean is reliability, some of the problems I have
is probably due to lack of use, and it's only got 30K on the clock.
Every time I buy new, it's great having 3 years problem free, but what
it is worth after 3 years is dreadful.
I would like to know how many members bought used newish cars and
others who bought older lowish mile cars to see who had the most problems.
Would be nice to have a chart with all the figures on, might even help members to choose a vehicle.




But if you use it as a daily driver, the running cost's would be much higher, so then a newer one with a warranty would of course be best since it is difficult to get a warranty for these older fine looking cars.

As long as you do your maintenance, the older cars have been "cured" of the youth problems, since the earlier "problems" have been rectified, so like mine that has 28' miles, has been quite bulletproof.
Good luck with your choice, sound 8, mine is in storage now in an old barn from 1950, where it's cosy and nice with a thick blanket on top to keep her warm and dry.




trouble is my garage is full of junk. As for a new car, buying one just after
3 years seems logical. Why does every one say the SL65 is a classic and will
grow in value, at the moment their taking a bashing price wise..
Trending Topics




The Best of Mercedes & AMG



Great to achieve "Felony Speed" in 3.6 sec. !! - Spank new '14 Corvettes- ( new Z06 may be a different story.)


