SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Autobild Test: Gallardo/Viper/SL55
http://www.autobild.de/test/neuwagen...rtikel_seite=0
I think the Gallardo looks very sharp and is a well deserved winner. The extra weight imposed on the SL by the roof - not just the bits that move but the underlying additional strengthening required is the Achilles heel of the car, but it does come out well.
The 55 out ran the 550 and the AM no problem. It was just edged out to 60 by the 996 and then the 55 walked away and I believe the 55 out ran the Lambo to 150.
As they had a derestricted car it finished 2nd in top speed 202...vs the Lambo's 205.
It was especially good on the British B roads that they ran on.
Not bad for a car with all the toys.
I know that this is a pretty good estimation of the 55 as I track mine and there are very few cars that can stay with it.
Feel free to add.
T
That test that I quoted earlier was in Autocar, not Evo. The SL's time to 300kph was 32 sec, the Mucielago did it in 34 sec, Porsche Turbo in 40, 550 Maranello in 63sec! I don't remember the Vanquish...but it was slower than the 550
I can't wait to get some slicks!
Last edited by IngenereAMG; Mar 19, 2004 at 01:23 PM.
Trending Topics
In reality the 55's do 0-300kph in about 43-48 seconds...
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




Sorry to disappoint but the SL55 that did 0-300kph in 32 seconds, was actually a prototype car for the SLR engine and was putting out 617bhp!
That SL was a regular SL55,just derestricted.
There is no way a stock delimited SL with 500bhp will do 0-300 in 32 seconds, like it or leave it. That particular SL was a testbed for the SLR engine. When AMS wanted a protototype SL55 for the comaprison test, Daimlchrysler handed them this one with 617bhp, and well you know the rest...AMG was not happy about this since it wasn't s stock car.
Whether you believe it or not is up to you.
If the car wasn't stock, then the 0-100kmh and 400m results woul dbe faster than the stock SL55. Is this so?




