SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: sl 55, sl65 or sl-63
Choice 1, 2005 SL-65 with <8K mi. but little service information. I know a sitting car is not good, but it has been driven 1500 miles over the last several years. From a MB dealership. Will get a thorough PPI. Wondering If over 5 years the maintenance saving for a low mileage car would justify getting this over a 45k mile car for about $33K. I probably wouldn't be putting more than 3000 miles/year on the car, so it would retain value as a a low mileage car. Disadvantage is I can't buy a warranty for the car.
Choice 2 Sl-55. I favor the SL-65 because it is unusual and from what I've read here the V12 engine isn't really a problem and most of the weakness of the SL-65 are shared with the SL-55. The SL-55 would be less expensive, there is a nice red one on BaT. My guess is that I'd enjoy driving a SL-55 as much as an SL-65.
Choice 3 2013 SL-63. Newer technology, but continued depreciation.
Im at the point now of having read through MBWorld, which leaves me at a higher level of confusion, but well informed. Im guessing that many others have faced a similar choice and somehow reached a decision.
All things considered, I thought the total cost of ownership would be about the same




If your into 80s and 90s technology go for the sl55 If you are comfortable with more current cars get the 13 its a great car



Could have purchased a 65 in same price range but maintenance, due to complexity, is predicted to be 2x-3x that of a 55. In either case I would count on thousands per year in maintenance costs.
Good luck.


