SL 63 vs AMG GT whats the point?
#1
SL 63 vs AMG GT whats the point?
If I'm not mistaken they have the same engine, looks about the same, cost about the same. So why would anyone buy the SL 63? And please don't tell me because of the hardtop.
I'm not looking to stir things up. Just understand what the deal is. Thanks!
I'm not looking to stir things up. Just understand what the deal is. Thanks!
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
SL is a luxury car , compared to a GT . A GT is competition to a 911. Its 2 seats with hardly no room at all anywhere else in the car. And its all business. A SL is close to an S class car. It gives you all the options and features of a S class car, in a sport version. A huge trunk, luxo features and a convertible. And they dont have the same engine, the sl has 4.7 and 5.5 and 6 liter V8&V12, the gt has the 4L
I dont want a GT , Ive had 911s and moved up to a SL to get room and features a 911 doesnt have. If I wanted to go to back to a 911 I might get a GT
I dont want a GT , Ive had 911s and moved up to a SL to get room and features a 911 doesnt have. If I wanted to go to back to a 911 I might get a GT
The following users liked this post:
67427 (09-21-2020)
#3
Senior Member
SL is a luxury car , compared to a GT . A GT is competition to a 911. Its 2 seats with hardly no room at all anywhere else in the car. And its all business. A SL is close to an S class car. It gives you all the options and features of a S class car, in a sport version. A huge trunk, luxo features and a convertible. And they dont have the same engine, the sl has 4.7 and 5.5 and 6 liter V8&V12, the gt has the 4L
I dont want a GT , Ive had 911s and moved up to a SL to get room and features a 911 doesnt have. If I wanted to go to back to a 911 I might get a GT
I dont want a GT , Ive had 911s and moved up to a SL to get room and features a 911 doesnt have. If I wanted to go to back to a 911 I might get a GT
The following users liked this post:
WLP624 (06-27-2019)
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Agree with what's been posted. If I wanted a track car I would have bought the GT but I want a go fast convertible hard top that has the comfort of an S class (almost) that I can enjoy driving everyday whether it's to the golf course or a 300 mile trip. After driving the GT for 5 minutes and feeling every crack in the road it was a no brainer for me. It's also why I sold my 911 after 6 months. I've switched to the dark side of wanting more comfortable to drive.
The difference in the amenities/creature comforts is what sets them apart and why I bought the SL. Ooops.... guess I wasn't supposed to mention the convertible hard top....
The difference in the amenities/creature comforts is what sets them apart and why I bought the SL. Ooops.... guess I wasn't supposed to mention the convertible hard top....
The following 3 users liked this post by idrive:
#6
Member
I just traded a 16 GTS for a 13' SL65 and I can tell you it is purely about what you want out of the car. The SL is a far more practical car. the GTS was VERY loud and rode very rough. Lots of road noise not found in any other AMG
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
That said I prefer my SL63 for road use.
Trending Topics
#9
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 10,127
Received 3,343 Likes
on
2,064 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
The SL is a very capable and fast cruiser, the GT is a less comfortable but highly capable sports car. IMO, the AMG GT is a better looking car but lacks some of the practicality of the SL. Both are fun to drive with more versatility going to the SL. We drive our SL in the winter with snow tires, something I would never consider doing with the GT
The following users liked this post:
mainly (06-24-2023)
#10
Member
I think the 231 SLs are likely the most under appreciated sport GT cars on the market today. Especially the AMG 63/65s. For a street (non track) sports / grand touring machine, they cover all the bases. Elegant, comfortable, S Class luxurious, timeless design, fast enough, decent trunk and yeah, a retractable hardtop.
My dealer recently told me I should trade my perfect 2013 SL65 in on a new GT. I looked him in the eye and asked: Why?
His response fell flat on me and him...if I wanted a 911 I’d go buy one.
My dealer recently told me I should trade my perfect 2013 SL65 in on a new GT. I looked him in the eye and asked: Why?
His response fell flat on me and him...if I wanted a 911 I’d go buy one.
The following 2 users liked this post by HSCLA:
LandSeaAir (03-30-2020),
tandan (04-23-2018)
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
To be fair, when the SL63 loan pays thru, I may get a GT. Nothing wrong with an AMG 911.
note: I finance cars.... because. lots of reasons. but for one thing, being upside down in a loan tends to calm the nerves a bit about new toys
note: I finance cars.... because. lots of reasons. but for one thing, being upside down in a loan tends to calm the nerves a bit about new toys
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
Having driven both at Road Atlanta and COTA I can tell you the cars are completely different. The SL is a floater at best, GT much longer hood and sharper turn in. The GT is essentially a 2nd gen SLS, and building on that car they improved the original design.
The following users liked this post:
wawrecker (06-27-2019)
#13
Senior Member
No one is arguing against the GT being better on track.... But to call the SL a floater is just ridiculous.
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
The AMG GT is a 2 door coupe. No ABC or airmatic. Also it lacks tons of luxury features when compared to a SL. The reason is because it is more of a driving car and a GT car. They have similarities but they are not the same. Also, the SL is a luxury car. Always has been(Hence why I had a couple of them before). The AMG variants are very capable cars with amazing power. However given the choice I would do a cross country drive from coast to coast in a SL over a AMG GT. The engines are also not the same. They never offered the 4.0 V8TT in a SL at least in the USA. Also one is a soft top and the other is a hard top. I have owned both hard and soft top cars and they offer different experiences.
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
I think the SL550 or SL400 is a more of a floater car but no AMG is a floater.
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
I do as well. Considering my wife and I have near perfect credit and investments are paying a hell of a lot more then the current interest rates on car loans I have 0 reason to pay cash. My work truck is ran thru the business so that is a write off anyways. I want a AMG GT when the prices comes down a little bit.
The following users liked this post:
AFRJacket (10-16-2019)
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Posts: 1,300
Received 195 Likes
on
168 Posts
16 E550 Cab, 2003 Ram bright red crewcab 4x4 we call Clifford :)
I do as well. Considering my wife and I have near perfect credit and investments are paying a hell of a lot more then the current interest rates on car loans I have 0 reason to pay cash. My work truck is ran thru the business so that is a write off anyways. I want a AMG GT when the prices comes down a little bit.
The following users liked this post:
AFRJacket (04-18-2019)
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
[QUOTE=mellowyellow;7460662]Floater? Seriously? Were you tracking in comfort mode? That specific comment has no basis in reality.
No one is arguing against the GT being better on track.... But to call the SL a floater is just ridiculous.[/QUOTE
Reality of driving both cars on 2 tracks. What track have you driven both cars?
Yes the SL is soft and meant to be. Sl’s weight pulls the car out of a line. Really 2 distinctly different experiences
SL has same trunk area as GT.
No one is arguing against the GT being better on track.... But to call the SL a floater is just ridiculous.[/QUOTE
Reality of driving both cars on 2 tracks. What track have you driven both cars?
Yes the SL is soft and meant to be. Sl’s weight pulls the car out of a line. Really 2 distinctly different experiences
SL has same trunk area as GT.
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
I have driven both cars (SL63 and GT-S) at Road Atlanta. Yes, the GT is better on the track. But the SL was surprisingly good on the track - if you picked one with carbon ceramics, and got it you put it in S suspension, S+ shifting, tightened up the bolsters on the seats, and made sure it was in the lowered setting.
As good as a GT-S? Hell no! Better than the E/CLS or even the C? Surprisingly so (the carbon ceramics and lack of brake fade I think made the biggest difference over the C63)
But still. On the street? Totally different dynamic comes into play. At least for actually driving. For "look at me" cruising, you really should just have a Lambo or Ferrari.
As good as a GT-S? Hell no! Better than the E/CLS or even the C? Surprisingly so (the carbon ceramics and lack of brake fade I think made the biggest difference over the C63)
But still. On the street? Totally different dynamic comes into play. At least for actually driving. For "look at me" cruising, you really should just have a Lambo or Ferrari.
The following users liked this post:
AFRJacket (04-18-2019)
#21
I legitimately bought mine because of the hardtop. I wanted another convertible but the softtop on my previous car (M Roadster) was an enormous pain in the ***.
The following users liked this post:
AFRJacket (06-24-2019)
#22
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
5 Posts
TT 512 BB Ferrari, Dinan Z8,997 GT3, 74 BMW 3.0CSI
I agree with the main line of reason above. The SL is a wonderful "jack of all trades" car...the McGyver of autoworld. As was stated above, if you take the time to get the settings dialed the SL is very capable. Not on par with the GT C or 911T but very fun and luxurious and the hard top comes down w/o effort.
This is my 3rd SL, and though I have several other cars, its my favorite all around car.
This is my 3rd SL, and though I have several other cars, its my favorite all around car.
The following users liked this post:
AFRJacket (04-18-2019)
The following users liked this post:
AFRJacket (06-24-2019)
#24
Actually, me too. I'm 6'8, though I don't mind smaller cars as long as I can drive them. But for a daily that's fun and powerful, the SL kicks ***.
The following users liked this post:
AFRJacket (06-24-2019)
#25
the SL63 is a very underrated car at 577 horsepower and I think mine has more in the range of 630 in reality.... how else am I running middle Elevns in the quarter mile with tires that don't grip very well off the line... at 127 mile per hour.... I also had a little side by side with a 2017 Nissan GTR and he could not keep up with me... Shocked him and me as well to be honest..