SLK-Class (R171) 2004-2010: SLK200K, SLK280, SLK350, SLK55, SLK55 Black Series

SLK/R171: Which would you choose - SLK 55 or SL 55?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-22-2005, 05:45 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
NeilC123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Midlands, England
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLK 230
Which would you choose - SLK 55 or SL 55?

Hi,

I was just curious i wanted to ask people - if they had the choice between the SLK 55 AMG or the SL 55 AMG - which would they choose and why?

Thanks
Old 05-22-2005, 06:02 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMGfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 4,929
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
06 SL65 / 97 993tt /11 Suburban/ 2012 GTR (AMG è la mia Famiglia la Bestia è la mia protezione)
Sl55/65
Old 05-22-2005, 07:32 PM
  #3  
Newbie
 
sergioinmiami's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Miami
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLK350 LE
I would go with the SLK55, the tail on the SL55 is too heavy and the SLK55 is 1000 lbs lighter.
Old 05-22-2005, 09:26 PM
  #4  
Member
 
AC556F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'08 SL65
Depends on how old & how rich one is.
Old 05-22-2005, 10:42 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
kaze81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 1,172
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mercedes
Originally Posted by AC556F
Depends on how old & how rich one is.

Agree..
Old 05-29-2005, 07:59 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
NeilC123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Midlands, England
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLK 230
new slk or old sl...

When choosing between these cars most people seem to have gone for the SL for males. I hope Mercedes are listening before they decide to do the facelift to make the SL look like the SLR...will that make the SL too girly and make the SLK look too much like the SL...interesting times...
Old 05-29-2005, 11:25 PM
  #7  
Almost a Member!
 
SLKfromLOKEY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 SLK55, iridium/black 030 AMG Performance Pkg 319 Lighting Pkg 326 Premium Pkg 420 Entertainment
Red face

I actually like the SLK more but would have to be crazy to say that I'd take the SLK55 of the SL55, since the SL55 is much more powerfull and expensive, but price aside I'd go with the SLK, the SL doesn't seem as sporty to me and I you get more looks in the SLK, I might be wrong though. I think it's bad for us SLK owners if the SL gets a nose job, since we would no longer look like we are mocking the SLR but more like the SL and the SL like the SLR, even though we got the nose job first. I don't know if anyone knows this but while searching Ebay "search SL", I found a seller that sells a replacement hood for the SL, a SLR style hood. So no one has to wait for Mercedes to release that new nose or have the old one. A do it yourself SLR nose is available.
Old 05-30-2005, 01:43 AM
  #8  
Newbie
 
matteo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'03 C230 Kompressor 6-spd
Talking

SLK 55 AMG please. Thank you :p
Old 05-30-2005, 04:05 AM
  #9  
Member
 
mr_markski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Daly City CA.
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
c220--sold now--W210
SL 55!! The SLK is a little too small, in my opinoin its a chick car.
Old 06-01-2005, 10:48 PM
  #10  
Member
 
evanichka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hawaii/Conneticut
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 SLK350
SL55 over SLK55 for me... never drove the SLK55 though, but I doubt the SLK has the sound of the SL. just start the engine of the SL55 and you just get a huge grin on your face. not to mention the SL55 is faster, not that it matters since i probably will never drive it to even 70% of its full potential

and yeah SLK is a lot smaller than the SL, esp the trunk space... c'mon i cant even put a driver in the trunk of the SLK without bending it slightly where as i can fit two small golf bags in the SL

the look of the SLK has been growing on me, but I still would have to go with the SL55

the main reason i really like the new SLK is because of the manual tranny. just love it, although i still prefer the m3 manual tranny (not that smg crap)
Old 06-02-2005, 04:03 PM
  #11  
Super Member
 
Shinigami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland
Posts: 761
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLK 55 AMG
If I had enough money to buy the SL55 (or especially the 65) over the SLK55, I'd buy a Ferrari 430 instead

/me pours some more fuel into the fire, heh
Old 06-07-2005, 11:13 PM
  #12  
Almost a Member!
 
J10B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BMW Z3 S/C & 99 Mroadster
you are killing me Neil, you are posting in both forums, I thought you were buying an auston?
girly car? thats great see those with clues will note that old ladies drive SL500s and SL600s. Older men drive AMG Slk55s 55s and 65s. See most women go for a look while the men go for performance. The biggest chick car in MBs lineup is the C class.
Old 09-28-2005, 04:42 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
chitownc32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: MORTON GROVE,IL
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BLACK 2005 SLK55 AMG,02 SILVER C32(SOLD),02 ML320 SILVER(Sold),99 S320 BLUE, 03 E500 Sport Pewter
actually a slk55 sounds a lot better than an sl55. I work at a dealership that carries almost every type of car and drove the sl55 2003 and it doesn't roar as much as the slk55. Don't get me wrong the sl55 is a great car. No way I'm putting it down. But when you get a chance go drive a slk55 and you'll see what i'm talking about
Old 09-28-2005, 05:50 PM
  #14  
Super Member
 
SLK55AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
987S
Originally Posted by evanichka
SL55 over SLK55 for me... never drove the SLK55 though, but I doubt the SLK has the sound of the SL.
Having driven both I'd say the SLK55 sounds better than the SL55
Old 09-28-2005, 07:33 PM
  #15  
Member
 
evanichka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hawaii/Conneticut
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 SLK350
heh i guess ill have to test drive the slk55 sometime
Old 10-10-2005, 09:49 AM
  #16  
Almost a Member!
 
gdsmith56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Harpers Ferry, WV
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLK55, Ford F350 Diesel, WV Jetta TDI
Originally Posted by evanichka
the main reason i really like the new SLK is because of the manual tranny. just love it, although i still prefer the m3 manual tranny (not that smg crap)
Interesting observation ... however, the manual transmission is NOT an option on the SLK55. It comes standard with the 7-speed automatic. And to me, that's preferable to the 5-speed that is currently in the SL class. (Have the SL's gotten the 7-speed yet??)

And since money IS a factor, we're getting the SLK55 - just as soon as we sell our SLK350.
Old 10-11-2005, 12:36 AM
  #17  
Member
 
evanichka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hawaii/Conneticut
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 SLK350
i know its not an option on the 55, and that is the reason i didnt get an amg
Old 10-11-2005, 12:30 PM
  #18  
Junior Member
 
mhsherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 19
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why change a 350 for a 55?

Originally Posted by gdsmith56
And since money IS a factor, we're getting the SLK55 - just as soon as we sell our SLK350.
In my opinion the SLK is the ONLY MB that does NOT need to be AMG to be a driver's car. (OK so I am normally a BMW kinda guy.)
Old 10-11-2005, 07:48 PM
  #19  
Almost a Member!
 
gdsmith56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Harpers Ferry, WV
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLK55, Ford F350 Diesel, WV Jetta TDI
Upgrading cars

Originally Posted by mhsherman
Why change a 350 for a 55?
It's purely a matter of aesthetics. After 10 months, the car's "real" owner (my wife ) has stated that she doesn't like the brown leather interior. We both like the car but she's decided the interior has to go. And we've decided that if we're going to do this, we're going to do it right. Either a NICE SL-500 or order an SLK-55 exactly the way that we want it.

pure and simple - aesthetics

we have pictures at
http://ICanHelp56.homestead.com/MB_SLK350_01.html
Old 10-13-2005, 06:54 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
AMG&AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
Originally Posted by NeilC123
Hi,

I was just curious i wanted to ask people - if they had the choice between the SLK 55 AMG or the SL 55 AMG - which would they choose and why?

Thanks

well, both are great cars... the SLK 55 feels a stripped out with minimum luxury .... the SL 55 interior is just gorgeous ... feels like your sitting at home cruising around with total pleasure and comfort and instant tremendous power reserve...

The SLK 55 t me feels more sport... and the sound is great, although the SL 55 sounds great but the K's feels more original coming out from an N/A engine versus supercharged...


now a days I drive the SLK 55 more... I drive the SL when I want more comfort and dont care for serious driving, just the pleasure of just cruising around in comfort versus the K's ... back breaker, I dont feel fully comfortable in the SLK .. I guess its because of my back


at the end , it depend what you want and what are you willing to pay ... but both cars wont let you down.....
Old 10-13-2005, 06:55 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
AMG&AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
Originally Posted by NeilC123
Hi,

I was just curious i wanted to ask people - if they had the choice between the SLK 55 AMG or the SL 55 AMG - which would they choose and why?

Thanks

well, both are great cars... the SLK 55 feels a stripped out with minimum luxury .... the SL 55 interior is just gorgeous ... feels like your sitting at home cruising around with total pleasure and comfort and instant tremendous power reserve...

The SLK 55 to me feels more sporty , maybe because of the weight , the dimension and the less luxurious oriented... and the sound is great, although the SL 55 sounds great but the K's sounds more original coming out from an N/A engine versus supercharged...


now a days I drive the SLK 55 more... I drive the SL when I want more comfort and dont care for serious driving, just the pleasure of just cruising around in comfort versus the K's ... back breaker, I dont feel fully comfortable in the SLK .. I guess its because of my back


at the end , it depend what you want and what are you willing to pay ... but both cars wont let you down.....
Old 10-23-2005, 01:30 PM
  #22  
Almost a Member!
 
CMiYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'06 SLK55
I chose the SLK55. The SL55 makes for a great car to cruise around town, but performs pretty lousy on the race track. It is more of AMG's idea of "massive power, tight springs, sticky tires, hope for the best." At least with the lenght/weight of the SLK55, it is fairly well balanced.

If I was going to for something more powerful/larger, I would not have chose a MB/AMG.
Old 10-23-2005, 03:56 PM
  #23  
Member
 
Vodil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 173
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2006 SLK350
Originally Posted by CMiYC
I If I was going to for something more powerful/larger, I would not have chose a MB/AMG.
Like an M6?
Old 10-27-2005, 04:08 PM
  #24  
Member
 
knihc2008's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 Mercedes SLK350
haha choosing between an SLK55 and an SL55.. quite a difference isn't it? it really depends what you're looking for in a car, cuz they really are totally different.

but for an SL55's price, i'd rather be driving an aston martin AMV8.
Old 01-23-2006, 07:16 PM
  #25  
Newbie
 
pvanhecke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLK 55 AMG versus SL 55 AMG

I guess it is an issue of what you really want to achieve. I read responses that are absolutly either incorrect or misleading. The 55 SLK AMG is not a girly girl car or a wannabe 55 SL. I tested both before buying a SLK 55. I have owned in the past 5 years 2 porsche 1 1999 996 and 1 997 S with sport package/ cold air intake and other goodies. I also had a 2002 Spyder Maserati and a 2000 Honda S2000. Today I own a 55 SLK AMG along with a 1969 Corvette stingray big block. I use to race go kart when I was a kid...

all of this to tell you that if you are a car fanatic like me you will realize that the 55 AMG SLK hold its ground against bigger, more expensive cars. If like one post suggested you want to show off or you do not understand a car beyond its sticker price then the 55 SL AMG is for you. You will get more fun from the SLK as you will not feel the weight so much. The SLK drives more like a sports/race car whereas the SL drives more like a touring car. The SLK is purer in its reponse to acceleration and more importantly to cornering. The sensation of acceleration are very much the same along with the fabuleous noice for the exhaust from either car.
Trust me I have owned $100K+ car: this car is well undervalued and can only be appreciated in a twisted road where there you will leave a SL 55 AMG well behind. Of course if Mika is driving the SL that would be another story.
Going out to show off: get the 55 SL AMG, getting the real deal then get the SLK AMG.
Best,
A car crazy guy.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SLK/R171: Which would you choose - SLK 55 or SL 55?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:26 PM.