SLK/R171: slk 350 or slk 55
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2006 slk 55 amg
slk 350 or slk 55
I'm thinking of trading in my clk 350 but could not decide which one to get:
1. slk 350 - can get one with all options I want but hp is the same as my current car (auto transmission)
2. slk 55 - can only get with premium package.
Which would you choose?
Thanks,
1. slk 350 - can get one with all options I want but hp is the same as my current car (auto transmission)
2. slk 55 - can only get with premium package.
Which would you choose?
Thanks,
#4
Member
Maybe not for a daily driver
Originally Posted by kchristos
If money is no issue, I believe it's a no brainer! SLK55
More seriously, there a few things that could be negatives about the 55:
1) it is lower and will be even worse at going on bumpy parking lots etc.
2) it looks more aggressive, which may not be what you want
3) it rides more aggressive (stiffer) which may not be what you want
Whie the money did matter to me, I actually preferred the 350 becase it is what I drive all the time and it is the blend of comfort and power that suits me.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Virginia USA
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SLK55///AMG The MONSTER on the block
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Skokie, Illinois
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Living in New York City, you'll probably use the extra H.P. of the SLK 55 a lot less than you will use the many extra options that you can afford on the SLK 350. The horse power may be the same as your CLK but the performance will be a lot better. My advice is go with the fully loaded SLK 350.
Trending Topics
#9
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 197
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1990 560 SEC (modified), SLK55, CLK500
Odd, i compared a fully loaded slk350 against SLK55 with just NAV, and the price difference was less than 10K, so i went for SLK55. I reasoned that i LOVE speed and power, and with the 55 engine i could live with a few options less. Although the 55 is stretching my budget a little, i find it WELL worth it. Absolute BLAST to drive.
Though i may be biased as a i have a nearly fully loaded clk500, so i can drive that when i need a little more space and comfort.
But afterall, it's an SLK, i'm not really getting it because it's a 'comfy' car...
Though i may be biased as a i have a nearly fully loaded clk500, so i can drive that when i need a little more space and comfort.
But afterall, it's an SLK, i'm not really getting it because it's a 'comfy' car...
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MBZ SLK
Originally Posted by Vodil
If money is not an issue how about an SLR or an SL65?
More seriously, there a few things that could be negatives about the 55:
1) it is lower and will be even worse at going on bumpy parking lots etc.
2) it looks more aggressive, which may not be what you want
3) it rides more aggressive (stiffer) which may not be what you want
Whie the money did matter to me, I actually preferred the 350 becase it is what I drive all the time and it is the blend of comfort and power that suits me.
More seriously, there a few things that could be negatives about the 55:
1) it is lower and will be even worse at going on bumpy parking lots etc.
2) it looks more aggressive, which may not be what you want
3) it rides more aggressive (stiffer) which may not be what you want
Whie the money did matter to me, I actually preferred the 350 becase it is what I drive all the time and it is the blend of comfort and power that suits me.
#11
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Suffolk County, Long Island, NY
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2010 SLK 350, 2010 Infiniti FX 35, 2007 SLK55 AMG, 1988 CRX SI
nycboy: see "350/55 SLK - Manual vs Auto" thread
I had a similar question....and also a thread on if 350 owners felt the car had ample power. My dilemma is will I have as much fun in an AT (55). Some members have actually been very honest with there opinons (backed up their thoughts - like Ynot)...at this point I still want an MT in my life and I'm not sure if the 55 will give me that same thrill. 55's power and aggressive look still entices me. I just need to make a freak'n decision.
I would get Enterainment Package rather than the Premium - Comman/Head unit much better than the standard console.
![action](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/action1.gif)
Originally Posted by nycboy
2. slk 55 - can only get with premium package.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Virginia USA
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SLK55///AMG The MONSTER on the block
Originally Posted by Veroomer
I had a similar question....and also a thread on if 350 owners felt the car had ample power. My dilemma is will I have as much fun in an AT (55). Some members have actually been very honest with there opinons (backed up their thoughts - like Ynot)...at this point I still want an MT in my life and I'm not sure if the 55 will give me that same thrill. 55's power and aggressive look still entices me. I just need to make a freak'n decision.
I would get Enterainment Package rather than the Premium - Comman/Head unit much better than the standard console.
![action](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/action1.gif)
I would get Enterainment Package rather than the Premium - Comman/Head unit much better than the standard console.
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'10 Porsche Turbo PDK, 500e, GL450
test drive
Have you test driven both? It doesn't sound like you have ...
If you do, you should be able to answer the manual vs 7 speed auto question. I personally love the 7 speed.
Also you should be able to answer the question "is the HP enough on the 350?"
Personally I didn't think it was enough for me on the SLK55.
If you do, you should be able to answer the manual vs 7 speed auto question. I personally love the 7 speed.
Also you should be able to answer the question "is the HP enough on the 350?"
Personally I didn't think it was enough for me on the SLK55.
#14
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Suffolk County, Long Island, NY
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2010 SLK 350, 2010 Infiniti FX 35, 2007 SLK55 AMG, 1988 CRX SI
Originally Posted by Jesseliu
Have you test driven both? It doesn't sound like you have ...
![smash](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smashfreak.gif)
Your Renntech (sweet) would be overkill here on Long Island - not to mention losing my license.
I can't agree more about the significant power diff., ride and looks on the 55. But all I have driven (my cars) since '79 have been small 2 seater MTs. I'm not opposed to the 7 speed AT, I was very impressed - just not enough to rule out the stick. HEY DOES ANY ONE HAVE A STICK I CAN TEST!
-1- Well equip 55 is in my budget, but I not looking to make a statement with my ride....I desire the fun of driving a very sweet looking roadster, both fit this description. It seems you and Ynot both love your MT 350's. You guys have the right attitude/reasons about your selections. I want my head clear of any doubts when I sign on the dotted line.
I appreciated your opinions in a diff. thread and now...if there were a stick version of the 55 it would be a no brainer for all us MT performance lovers.
Thx
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Virginia USA
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SLK55///AMG The MONSTER on the block
Originally Posted by Veroomer
-1- Well equip 55 is in my budget, but I not looking to make a statement with my ride....I desire the fun of driving a very sweet looking roadster, both fit this description. It seems you and Ynot both love your MT 350's. You guys have the right attitude/reasons about your selections. I want my head clear of any doubts when I sign on the dotted line.
I appreciated your opinions in a diff. thread and now...if there were a stick version of the 55 it would be a no brainer for all us MT performance lovers.
Thx
I appreciated your opinions in a diff. thread and now...if there were a stick version of the 55 it would be a no brainer for all us MT performance lovers.
Thx
![Confused](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
![bs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/bs.gif)
#16
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
MB 2004 C230K 6-Sp-Manual Sedan Mars Red
my opinion, as long as i can shift, i would get an SLK350 MT. the fun factor is off the scale! i see no point getting an AT when it is a sports car, not even an //AMG
i have more fun riding my 21 speed bike and driving my cheap entry level C230K 6-sp than driving an SL500. it is about becoming one with the machine. the short-throw shifter is so much fun to play with. however, if you think one day you will get sick and tired of shifting gears in the city, dont get the MT.
but it is your $$$
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
i have more fun riding my 21 speed bike and driving my cheap entry level C230K 6-sp than driving an SL500. it is about becoming one with the machine. the short-throw shifter is so much fun to play with. however, if you think one day you will get sick and tired of shifting gears in the city, dont get the MT.
but it is your $$$
#17
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North UK
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SLK55 AMG, BMW X5 3.0d Sport
Seems to me that this is full of 350 owners who only wished they had the forsight to get a 55. Sour grapes.......
I bought a 350 and then 3 months later UPGRADED to the 55.
I bought a 350 and then 3 months later UPGRADED to the 55.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Virginia USA
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SLK55///AMG The MONSTER on the block
Originally Posted by Easy-SLK
Seems to me that this is full of 350 owners who only wished they had the forsight to get a 55. Sour grapes.......
I bought a 350 and then 3 months later UPGRADED to the 55.
I bought a 350 and then 3 months later UPGRADED to the 55.
![BeatDeatHorse](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/beatdeadhorse5.gif)
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MBZ SLK
Originally Posted by -1-
![BeatDeatHorse](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/beatdeadhorse5.gif)
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
It depends on each persons situation. My SLK is a year old and has only 3500 miles on it, obviously not my daily driver so I look forward to hoping in and moving thru all the gears. I love taking it up the mountains thru the twisties, trying to master the heel and toe (not recommended). I love that I'm engaged at every gear, step on the clutch, shift, gas, and go. I don't drive it very often, but everytime I hope in, it's like heaven. I don't think I will get that same feeling with an auto.
#20
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Suffolk County, Long Island, NY
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2010 SLK 350, 2010 Infiniti FX 35, 2007 SLK55 AMG, 1988 CRX SI
Originally Posted by -1-
![Confused](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
I'm not pretenous like Easy-SLK...I can be just as happy with 350 like you and Ynot...just need to feel the difference. May sound a bit
![crazy](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/crazy.gif)
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MBZ SLK
Originally Posted by Veroomer
I am confused as well - One would think they would acommondate me, right? I have requested, today, on MB site for a Test Drive of a MT SLK. I want to see if I get a response from my local dealer. This guy is close by, the rest are 1 hour plus from me here on Long Island. I have expressed several times to the sales manager get me a MT to test and I will buy one or the other. At this point I think it's time to take a day and drive to the other dealers. I'll keep you posted.
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Virginia USA
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SLK55///AMG The MONSTER on the block
Originally Posted by Ynot
Good luck in finding a 6sp MT for a test drive, while at the Kundencenter in Stuttgart, the delivery lady told me, over 80% of SLK's are autos, most 6sp MT are special ordered from the customer so, it's not common to find a MT SLK at any dealer's parking lot.
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#23
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Suffolk County, Long Island, NY
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2010 SLK 350, 2010 Infiniti FX 35, 2007 SLK55 AMG, 1988 CRX SI
Originally Posted by -1-
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I've sent out emails to four dealers in the area today. I will keep you posted on the responses and eventually my choice. Thanks again, -1- & Ynot.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Virginia USA
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SLK55///AMG The MONSTER on the block
Originally Posted by Easy-SLK
Ynot, you are such a jealous ****
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
![knuddel](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/knuddel.gif)
Last edited by -1-; 07-08-2006 at 06:44 AM.