SLK/R171: Performance of the slk 200 kompressor
10-24-2004, 11:45 AM
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Performance of the slk 200 kompressor
Hi,
What kind of perfomance should I expect in a slk 200 kompressor ? I know I shouldn´t expect a sport car performance, but how would it compare to a BMW 325i, or an Audi A3 1.8T, for example ?
Thanks !
Rafael
What kind of perfomance should I expect in a slk 200 kompressor ? I know I shouldn´t expect a sport car performance, but how would it compare to a BMW 325i, or an Audi A3 1.8T, for example ?
Thanks !
Rafael
any good free hosting sites?
10-25-2004, 07:58 PM
#4
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA / Berlin, Germany
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 MB SLK 55 AMG
Hard for me to compare, but I felt it very responsive and zippy, really. I mean, especially for city traffic and the occasional autobahn, it's quite nice. I felt that accelleration on the Autobahn really slowed down, but in the lower km/h, it's quick to go !
With full accelleration I got about 220 on a fairly level road max, give or take a few.
Dan
With full accelleration I got about 220 on a fairly level road max, give or take a few.
Dan
10-25-2004, 09:13 PM
#5
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I answered this in a previous thread; 0-62 km/hr in 7.9 for the manual; 8.2 for the auto according to MB's UK site. Those numbers (or at least the automatic's) aren't too much different than what you'll get with a 325 or a a3 1.8t, I believe (with the 2.0T FSI, all bets are off, though)
