SLK55 (R171) 2004 - 2010: SLK200K, SLK280, SLK350, SLK55, SLK55 Black Series

4 valve v8..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-01-2005, 01:48 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
vantage78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 SL500
4 valve v8..

So what's the consensus? When is the 4 valve V8 going to replace the current 5.5L AMG in the SLK55? 2007? 2008? Anyone with any more current news, beyond the mag speculations?
Old 04-01-2005, 05:32 AM
  #2  
Super Member
 
SLK55_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: No specific place
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SLK55 AMG
I guess it is the 63 engine!
Old 04-10-2005, 12:22 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ProjectC55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: City with Tall buildings!
Posts: 5,475
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
yep,Similar to the one found in the old 97' W210 AMG E50 and E60.
Old 04-19-2005, 10:09 PM
  #4  
Almost a Member!
 
JohnSLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.whnet.com/4x4/w164.html

some details in this link

ML 350 with 268 hp and 258 lb-ft 3.5 liter V6 (M272) spring 05
ML 500 with 302 hp and 339 lb-ft 5.0 liter V8 (M113) spring 05
ML 450 with 325 hp and 369 lb-ft 4.6 liter V8 (M273) 2006
ML 550 with 382 hp and 405 lb-ft 5.5 liter V8 (M273) 2006
ML 63 AMG with 496 hp and 442 lb-ft 6.0 liter V8 AMG (M156) spring 06

M273 and M156 being the 4 valve V8s.

Interesting that the 4.6L 4 valve would produce almost the same torque as the current 5.5L 3 valve and i would have expect the 5.5L 4 valve to have a bit more HP... these figures aren't official so we will have to wait and see.
Old 04-19-2005, 11:38 PM
  #5  
Super Member
 
mbbodytech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: White Lake, MI
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
04 C320 Coupe MT
We're all waiting for the new V* to be introduced with the 221 S class.....as soon as it comes out in the S, it will be a mid year introduction for the 164 M class, and I suppose all of the other incumbent 113 engined vehicles.
Old 04-20-2005, 12:46 AM
  #6  
Member
 
SLK55NEWB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dallas
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
10 E63
My 2 Cents...

Upgrading the SLK55 to a 6.3 liter engine within the next year or even 2 seems to be a poor business decision as well as a vey uneconomical one.

This is the first year run of the SLK55. I am sure the payback period for the R&D costs on this car would be at least 2 years. Look how long the E55 as well as other models were on the market before the SLK32 was upgraded to the 5.5. I predict the 06 SLK55 will have very little change and the 07 models will possibly recieve a supercharger. The only reason MB would need to even add the supercharger would be market competition. With the way gas prices and supplies are headed, it is real hard to predict how car manufacturers will respond.

Upgrading the SLK55 to the 6.3 would most likely mean an upgrade to the whole lineup of Mercedes models. If you ask me, highly unlikely. You will see the higher end MB models recieve the upgrade before the SLK and C classes will recieve them.

I guess we will wait and see as my opinions can be proven wrong.


Cheers and best regards!
Old 04-20-2005, 02:21 AM
  #7  
Almost a Member!
 
JohnSLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SLK55NEWB
Upgrading the SLK55 to a 6.3 liter engine within the next year or even 2 seems to be a poor business decision as well as a vey uneconomical one.
I don't MB will make the SLK faster than the SL which will be fitted with the same 6.3L engine when the 5.5L supercharger is dropped so my guess is the SLK will have the 5.5L 4 valve but not the 6.3L
Old 04-20-2005, 09:41 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
TEAShea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Nebraska, USA
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2016 C63
I would guess that they might not put the 6.3 liter engine in the SLK but they could easily put in the 5.5 4 valve engine. 382 hp and 405 torque would work and they would not have to redesin the chassis.

TEAShea
Old 04-21-2005, 10:18 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
vantage78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 SL500
Originally Posted by TEAShea
I would guess that they might not put the 6.3 liter engine in the SLK but they could easily put in the 5.5 4 valve engine. 382 hp and 405 torque would work and they would not have to redesin the chassis.

TEAShea
Hrmm, but that 5.5 4 valve isn't a AMG engine though, is it? Isn't this the new engine that will power the upcoming S-class? That would be strange if they kept the AMG engine, and it had less power than a standard S-class' V-8....
Old 04-22-2005, 05:00 AM
  #10  
Member
 
steve-p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Newbury, UK
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W210 E320, SLK55 AMG
Originally Posted by TEAShea
I would guess that they might not put the 6.3 liter engine in the SLK but they could easily put in the 5.5 4 valve engine. 382 hp and 405 torque would work and they would not have to redesin the chassis.
I'm sure they will, but only for reasons of cost since it doesn't make sense to make different but similar engines. An extra 22 bhp isn't going to make much difference to the performance, so it's not a big deal anyway.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 4 valve v8..



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:47 PM.