Slk55 Vs Ml63
You wouldn't happen to be the guy that weighs 260 lbs plus & had another heavy passenger with you when running a Euro M3 CSL a few years back in S. Africa would you? ....I hope not - that old exchange/thread was pretty comical.
MB sure gives nice numbers to the ML on their pages versus the SLK (which supposedly has done 4.3 in some tests).
Anyway, these are waaaaay different cars. The ML might get you from point a to point b in aircon coolness and comfort, but I'll take the SLK with the folding top, breeze in my face and better handling action any day of the week (except maybe the day I have to do a 10 hour drive through the arizone desert or something).
But I agree the 6.2 liter engine is really quite a good performer. I've had the pleasure of driving an E class, and it's blazingly fast. Quite likely faster then the SLK. The engine is just so smooth, and so very powerful.
So in the end, I wouldn't be too surprised if the ML was able to beat the SLK in a number of tests. It doesn't sound like it would be impossible. Ideally, one should fit fresh tires on both cars, take them to a drag strip, and do a few runs in each just to see what the results end up being.
Anyway, do show the vids, always interesting to watch.
Trending Topics
Come-on tell the truth that was an SLK350

The Best of Mercedes & AMG
All jokes aside though, if you're losing a short race like that in the vid by 5+ carlengths to an ML63, then something really isn't right.
Last edited by FishtailnZ; Sep 27, 2007 at 01:57 PM.

What's next? Losing to an M3?
, then again ,i should take your advice and have it checked out ,maybe it is broken
think its time to trade it in for a black series - oh, your age again?
Last edited by Earl; Sep 27, 2007 at 03:22 PM.
, then again ,i should take your advice and have it checked out ,maybe it is broken
think its time to trade it in for a black series - oh, your age again?
You're still a little too touchy about being questioned methinks - you don't seem to be able to take a joke, nor respond well to criticism. OK, I'll make allowance for this being the 'net and try and simplify it. It's got nothing to do with being a fan or not. Simple facts is all - and your vid just doesn't add up to facts on the performance of both vechicles. Either your SLK55 is not performing to par, or it was not being driven to it's potential. Simple as that. Age, baby prams, and gearing not withstanding. Again, try not gettting too upset, this is the internet.
ok ,you dont want to tell me ,well ,keep the passion dude,may your slk rock on
Last edited by Earl; Sep 27, 2007 at 04:38 PM.
Go look it up big Earl

If that's not enough please show us one? (1)? 1/4 mile time slip w/an ML63 in the 12's? What's that? Oh yeah there are NONE there all in the low 13's
Don't get me wrong the ML63 is a great SUV, but you're vid evidence vs SK55 is plain lame
It really isn't a hard car to drive the down the 1/4. My ex 6-speed Formula, now that car was a ***** to drive consistently *L*. And of course an SLK55 is faster than a 996TT! Yes that last part was a joke.
Again, seriously, it's hard to judge someones intent on a message board, which is why I usually liberally sprinkle my postings with various happy faces
. Just as it's not representative to expect an SLK55 to pull five cars on a 996TT, neither is it representative to expect it to lose by 5 cars to an ML63. And if it does consistently do so, then there is either something wrong with the car (seriously, get it checked) or the driver. No more no less.



